#NASA Never Tested Podkletnov's Experiment @AltPropulsionConference

Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago

NASA veteran Glen "Tony" Robertson clears the air about Ning Li, Podkletnov, Superconductors & Gravity Control. Robertson was a key participant in NASA superconductor efforts, and in this interview, he emphasizes the point that NASA never conducted a replication of Podkletnov's rotating superconductor, experiment.

Robertson also notes that subsequent replication attempts by others have all failed to meet the experimental criterion required by the original experimental outline in Eugene Podkletnov's scientific paper.

While NASA's involvement was limited and ultimately unsuccessful due to funding constraints and technical challenges (primarily superconductor fragility and creation difficulties), the speakers discuss ongoing independent research aiming to replicate and expand upon Podkletnov's experiments, which reportedly produced anomalous gravitational effects.

#NASA Never Tested Podkletnovs Experiment

UFO Reverse-Engineering & Dynamic Nuclear Polarization | Mark Sokol | Falcon Space 2024

Exploring the Searl Effect Generator Lab 2025 | Isaiah Ritchey

Exodus Propellantless Propulsion Business Applications | Exodus 2024

UAP Warp Drives & Tic Tac Technology | Jack Sarfatti

The Legendary Properties of Bismuth | Marat Mukhamedyarov

APEC 7/11: Torsion Cavitation Drives, ZPF Tech & Mass Displacement

$Zero-Point Energy in Stochastic Electrodynamics | Douglas Miller This talk frames matter and energy as emergent from local zero-point energy (ZPE) field density and asks what becomes possible if ZPE density can be engineered. It critiques the way early quantum theory “ghosted” the vacuum, then highlights stochastic electrodynamics (SED) as a physical-plenum alternative: a Lorentz-invariant sea of real fluctuations where inertia can be modeled as ZPF Lorentz drag (HRP), with extensions that treat constants as density-linked and time-variable (e.g., Setterfield). From there it introduces the “Miller Framework” as an engineering roadmap for “vacuum metric engineering,” built around six pillars (Madelung-style vacuum-as-fluid transition, a refractive-index-like coupling constant, Bohmian-trajectory thrust concepts, a nonlinear thrust scaling law, a “quantum packing fraction” coherence threshold around 4.64, and a recursive saturation threshold positioned as a lower-energy path compared to the Schwinger limit), aiming at propellantless thrust and vacuum-catalyzed fusion concepts.$

David Pares - Variable Electromagnetic Drive (VEM)