My Question for Timothy Alberino About 1 Enoch 71:14 and the Son of Man @DavidWilberBlog
My Question for Timothy Alberino About 1 Enoch 71:14 and the Son of Man  @DavidWilberBlog
Uploaded October 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
My question for Timothy Alberino: You acknowledge that the Ethiopic text that we have identifies Enoch as the Son of Man. So, are you claiming that the Book of Enoch, as we have it today, should be regarded as inspired? Or are you suggesting that some hypothetical version of the Book of Enoch—one for which we have no evidence—should be considered inspired? If it’s the former, then why argue that a book which you admit blatantly teaches a false Messiah should be considered inspired Scripture? And if it’s the latter, how do you justify promoting a hypothetical version of the Book of Enoch that we don’t even know exists as something that should be considered inspired? Is this like a Joseph Smith and the golden plates kinda thing? I really want to know which “Book of Enoch” you are pushing here, and how you deal with this problem. Looking forward to your response! CC: @TimothyAlberino

Subscribe to my newsletter: davidwilber.substack.com/subscribe

Check out more of my content on:
Personal website: davidwilber.com
Facebook: facebook.com/DavidWilberBlog
Amazon author page: amazon.com/author/davidwilber
Twitter: twitter.com/DavidWilberBlog
Instagram: instagram.com/davidwilberblog

#bookofenoch #sonofman #pseudepigrapha #timothyalberino #davidwilber
My Question for Timothy Alberino About 1 Enoch 71:14 and the Son of ManNick Fuentes is Wrong About the Law of Moses, Israel, and the New TestamentWhat Scripture Says About Same-Sex Relationships (An Interview with Dr. Michael Brown)The Truth About the Book of JubileesHow to Celebrate Sukkot / the Feast of Tabernacles - David WilberMatthew Vines & R. L. Solberg Are Wrong About Acts 15 and the Law
David Wilber |

My Question for Timothy Alberino About 1 Enoch 71:14 and the Son of Man

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER