My Argument for a Cosmic Beginning Isnt a Fallacy - William Lane Craig @mileskdonahue
My Argument for a Cosmic Beginning Isnt a Fallacy - William Lane Craig  @mileskdonahue
Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
William Lane Craig responds to criticisms from Dan Linford, Phil Halper, Niayesh Afshordi, and others that contend his scientific argument for a cosmic beginning commit basic probabilistic fallacies.

Full interview: youtu.be/2tvJa6agIGg

If you're a fan of the channel and want to support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber to my Substack: mileskdonahue.substack.com

Buy Me a Coffee: buymeacoffee.com/mileskdonahue

Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKD​
My Argument for a Cosmic Beginning Isnt a Fallacy - William Lane CraigContinental Philosophy: Genius or Gibberish?How Nietzsche Disproved Free WillWould This Convince Me God Exists? - Graham OppyWhat Happened Before the Big Bang?Richard Carrier Turns the Tables on TheistsAre There Objective Moral Truths? | David Enoch vs. Lance BushWhat Freud Didn’t Understand About Religion - Daniel WolneWhy Its Okay to Be Gay (and Christian)I Reply to Rapid Fire Objections to GodThere Is No Eternal Damnation | Randal RauserWhat the Case for the Resurrection Gets Wrong - Robyn Walsh
Miles K. Donahue |

My Argument for a Cosmic Beginning Isn't a Fallacy - William Lane Craig

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER