TheMagicSandwichShow | MSS - Number 64 - broadcast on 2 November 2013 @TheMagicSandwichShow | Uploaded November 2013 | Updated October 2024, 17 hours ago.
On the panel this week were:
c0nc0rdance
Hogtiechamp
thunderf00t (for a short time)
More to follow:
LINKS:
Jason Burn's thesis/paper/lecture/footnote (delete as you see appropriate) can be found here:
tinyurl.com/pdgwoh5
and here:
atheismexamined.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/evidence-for-resurrection-lecture-by.html?view=flipcard
The original (unedited) version can be found on The League of Reason thread here:
theleagueofreason.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=11871&hilit=jason+burns
dprjones' response to his paper is about the 10th entry. Contrary to Burns' comments, (namely that dprjones' response was about 200 words long), the response is over 2,200 words long. This represents a 10 fold error on Burns' part. However, given that Burns is a creationist this level of error should be expected.
On the panel this week were:
c0nc0rdance
Hogtiechamp
thunderf00t (for a short time)
More to follow:
LINKS:
Jason Burn's thesis/paper/lecture/footnote (delete as you see appropriate) can be found here:
tinyurl.com/pdgwoh5
and here:
atheismexamined.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/evidence-for-resurrection-lecture-by.html?view=flipcard
The original (unedited) version can be found on The League of Reason thread here:
theleagueofreason.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=11871&hilit=jason+burns
dprjones' response to his paper is about the 10th entry. Contrary to Burns' comments, (namely that dprjones' response was about 200 words long), the response is over 2,200 words long. This represents a 10 fold error on Burns' part. However, given that Burns is a creationist this level of error should be expected.
