Uploaded May 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Motility (1986)
Michael Horwood, harpischord
John Browell & Michael Hardwood, percussion
Motility is a two-channel stereo tape composition. The sound sources are harpsichord, two bass drums and two suspended cymbals. The original 1968-69 version used only one bass drum (L) and cymbal (R) plus the foreground harpsichord. In addition, that version lasted about five minutes longer.
The title, Motility, is a biological term referring to the motion of one-celled animal life (the amoeba, the paramecium, and other protozoa) in a hydrous environment. This is what the music is intended to depict, and it is, consequently, programmatic. Therefore, two ideas are essential to the work's content: the motion of uni-cellular animals and their water environment.
Motion is portrayed by the harpsichord in varying degrees of activity. It is the foreground and centre of focus just as one would see in a microscope while observing the life forms. The harpsichord part is an edited version of an extended solo improvisation. Some features developed during this improvisation include variation on one or a few motives, register, texture, accelerando, tone clusters, attack and decay. These features are further exploited and manipulated for the final mix. For example, the 'foreign' quality of this hidden world is conveyed by the simple yet impressive effects of combining forward and backward playback of the harpsichord part and channel shifting. Occasional pitch flutters are produced by intentionally bad tape splices wich allow the tape to 'catch' during playback.
The ever-present water environment is protrayed by the background percussion tracks. These parts consist of continuous rolls on all the instruments throughout the entire piece, varying only in volume. Each channel has a bass drum and cymbal. The cymbal tracks are played back at half speed and recorded independently.
Motility can be heard as an extension of those musics involving drones. Simply put, it combines static background (percussion) with active foreground (harpsichord). The music evolves slowly and culminates in a huge double climax near the end of the piece. Motiloty should be listened to with a moderately loud playback level. On less than adequate systems, the bass will need attenuation.
Finally, but not least, Motiloty is dedicated to William Thiele, the percussionist for the original version, and my other colleagues of that time, all of whom exhibited the good friendship and humour that was so much needed in those difficult years. --Michael Horwood
Original version & realisation - Bird Hard, State Univ. of NY at Buffalo, 1968-69.
1986 version - The Music Gallery, Toronto, Ontario, May 1986.
Art by Beatriz Morales
Motility (1986)
Michael Horwood, harpischord
John Browell & Michael Hardwood, percussion
Motility is a two-channel stereo tape composition. The sound sources are harpsichord, two bass drums and two suspended cymbals. The original 1968-69 version used only one bass drum (L) and cymbal (R) plus the foreground harpsichord. In addition, that version lasted about five minutes longer.
The title, Motility, is a biological term referring to the motion of one-celled animal life (the amoeba, the paramecium, and other protozoa) in a hydrous environment. This is what the music is intended to depict, and it is, consequently, programmatic. Therefore, two ideas are essential to the work's content: the motion of uni-cellular animals and their water environment.
Motion is portrayed by the harpsichord in varying degrees of activity. It is the foreground and centre of focus just as one would see in a microscope while observing the life forms. The harpsichord part is an edited version of an extended solo improvisation. Some features developed during this improvisation include variation on one or a few motives, register, texture, accelerando, tone clusters, attack and decay. These features are further exploited and manipulated for the final mix. For example, the 'foreign' quality of this hidden world is conveyed by the simple yet impressive effects of combining forward and backward playback of the harpsichord part and channel shifting. Occasional pitch flutters are produced by intentionally bad tape splices wich allow the tape to 'catch' during playback.
The ever-present water environment is protrayed by the background percussion tracks. These parts consist of continuous rolls on all the instruments throughout the entire piece, varying only in volume. Each channel has a bass drum and cymbal. The cymbal tracks are played back at half speed and recorded independently.
Motility can be heard as an extension of those musics involving drones. Simply put, it combines static background (percussion) with active foreground (harpsichord). The music evolves slowly and culminates in a huge double climax near the end of the piece. Motiloty should be listened to with a moderately loud playback level. On less than adequate systems, the bass will need attenuation.
Finally, but not least, Motiloty is dedicated to William Thiele, the percussionist for the original version, and my other colleagues of that time, all of whom exhibited the good friendship and humour that was so much needed in those difficult years. --Michael Horwood
Original version & realisation - Bird Hard, State Univ. of NY at Buffalo, 1968-69.
1986 version - The Music Gallery, Toronto, Ontario, May 1986.
Art by Beatriz Morales
![Helmut Zapf - Approximation
Approximation, for string trio (1996)
Trio 1
Trio 2 [11:38]
Finsterbusch Trio
Art by Tschabalala Self Helmut Zapf - Approximation](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pTwPCYxq6L4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Toshiro Mayuzumi - Music with Sculpture
Music with Sculpture (1961)
Eastman Wind Ensemble
Donald Hunsberger
Music with Sculpture is one of five works by Mayuzumi commissioned by the American Wind Symphony. The score requires a large wind ensemble, with special emphasis on the exploration of individual woodwind tone colors. This composition, alternately delicate in nature and overwhelming in its power, is a series of tonal sculptings highly sectional in content. Each short period establishes a basic texture and presents this quality in a manner which offers contrasts between the woodwinds and brasses. Tonal in harmonic content, the work makes use of tone clusters within individual family sections offset by clearly stated individual solo tone qualities. Carefully woven as a fine tapestry, Music with Sculpture is distinctive through its very definite tone colorations in its primarily restive nature. [Deutsche Grammophon – 2530 063]
Art by Kenneth Armitage Toshiro Mayuzumi - Music with Sculpture](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/r8YkMipPTgY/mqdefault.jpg)



![Nikolai Medtner - Four Lyrical Fragments
Four Lyrical Fragments, Op. 23 (1896-1911)
I. Allegro commodamente
II. Andantino gracile [3:04]
III. Tempo di Valse [6:05]
IV. Andantino tenebroso [7:56]
Alexander Bachtschijev, piano
The Four Lyrical Fragments Op. 23 reveal yet again the sheer variety of Medtner’s invention. All are in minor keys but each occupies its own unique expressive world. Particularly treasurable are the second piece, a bittersweet romance of exquisite delicacy, and the brooding fourth which has so much in common with Medtner’s Pushkin setting Remembrance, Op 32 No 2, that it is easy to conclude that it represents a similar sleepless night of self-recrimination. Hamish Milne
Art by Evelyn De Morgan Nikolai Medtner - Four Lyrical Fragments](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rJlzr6vZDWM/mqdefault.jpg)

![Guy Reibel - Carnaval
Carnaval, pour un comédien, trois chœurs et bande magnétique (1969)
Texte de Roger Marty
Pierre Rousseau, comédien
Ensemble Vocal Stéphane Caillat et Choristes des Chorales A coeur joie de Paris
Boris De Vinogradow, Rainer Boesch, Stéphane Caillat, chefs de choeurs
Reibel, an accomplished technician, of creative imagination, making full use of modern electroacoustics, reaches in his compositions a harmonious fusion of lively thought and boundless means. While striving with an unerring instinct to follow the line, the inner pulse of sound matter, though he seeks to preserve the union with the basic essential functions of musical media, he has nonetheless succeeded in cutting out for himself from the jungle of contemporary sounds a path of exceptional clarity. However rich in meaning, however plentiful and compact are his works, they are above all admirably written, and, when read, astonish and delight, coming as they do at a time when so many others fall apart owing to saturation.
Carnival, composed for three amateur choirs, an actor, and a stereo magnetic tape, is a game, a meeting, a pantomine, an explosion of life, a vast chassé-croisé of diverse musical dramatic and sonorous situations where words, syllables and sounds are scattered in a confusion of mime, jumps, gestures and shrieks, where continuity is effected through crowd displacements and general movement. In this jungle of phonetics an irresistible elementary force, a proliferous abundant effervescence stand out and display themselves as being none other than natural micro or macroscopic phenomena. The fundamental asymetrical laws of nature reign over this music though it is governed by an irresistible logic. Not by any means the constrictive arbitrary logic of some pre-established form but the profound unpredictable yet unerring logic of moving matter. Thus Reibel, through his elaborately planned compositions, rejoins the sacral spring, the theatrical efficacy of the Balinese ketchak. [STU 70599]
Art by Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo (attributed) Guy Reibel - Carnaval](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rU9Z2t43sjM/mqdefault.jpg)

![Alexandre Tansman - Cavatina
Cavatina (1951)
I. Preludio
II. Zarabanda
III. Scherzino
IV. Barcarola
V. Danza Pomposa
Ernesto Bitetti, guitar
Polish-born Alexandre Tansman (1897) is pianist, conductor, and one of today’s most important composers for the guitar. In a very unusual personal feat, he was awarded both first and second prizes for composition in 1919; it was accomplished by the young composer who submitted two different works, each under a different pseudonym. Later, in association with Ravel, he established himself as both pianist and conductor in Paris and later in the United States. During his years away from his native home Tansman retained his national and personal characteristics. His refined and sensitive art probably derives as much from syncopated rhythms and French-influenced modes of expression as from its original, strongly Polish quality. Tansman’s composing style has been compared to Chopin, who was a strong early influence, to Stravinsky, and Ravel, with music full of lyric tenderness and subtle melancholy. His works include symphonies, ballets, chamber music and oratorio. Tansman’s Cavatina for solo guitar received the first International Prize at the Academia Chigiana in Siena in 1951. It is a suite in the modern sense, beginning with a prelude, followed by a group of dances and ending with a light, frothy piece. [MS-871 Stereo]
Art by Wilhelm Sasnal Alexandre Tansman - Cavatina](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/s5dHux7AUpU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Grażyna Bacewicz - Music for Strings, Trumpets and Percussion
Music for Strings, Trumpets and Percussion (1958)
I. Allegro
II. Adagio [7:25]
III. Vivace [12:58]
Amadeus Chamber Orchestra of Polish Radio
Agnieszka Duczmal
Composed in 1958, Music for Strings, Trumpets and Percussion became famous as a unique piece in the composer’s hitherto classicistic-folkloristic oeuvre. The sonoristic technique, manifestations of which can be found in the composer’s many earlier pieces, became here the main force driving the development of each of the three movements.
Despite the novelty of its sound language, the piece does not lack some (neo)classical reminiscences, especially when it comes to its formal structure. The first movement, with its plan of a sonata allegro, is a structure based on two exposition themes, the first of which provides a characteristic expression to the whole movement. However, neither theme is a closed melodic idea, although the second theme contains a sophisticated canon in an inversion (violins and cellos), with a delay of a quaver, preserving the direction of the melody but not respecting strict interval sizes. After all, the development of the form is determined by the dynamism of movement, alternation of textures and variety of sound forms. The movement vector, constantly pointing forward, does make it possible, however, to develop some ideas in a broad sound space.
Theme I begins after an energetic introduction with a relentless monotony of a string tremolo, in some way drawing on the idea of the “pendular movement” from the Concerto for String Orchestra. Pendular figures, from which an accented note sometimes “leaps out” – by a augmented interval – are arranged alternatingly and asymmetrically, which creates an impression of meticulously planned “entropy” of the system, an impression enhanced by unevenly placed pizzicatos. This rushing stream grows steadily, encompassing an increasingly large interval range, only to turn – after a signal intervention of the trumpets and tremolo of the timpani – into a raucous, “turpist” tumult ending with a twelve-note aggregate.
After a moment of calm the trumpets enter with a quasi-theme, whose marching, broken rhythm, syncopated by double bass pizzicatos, resembles the mood of some fragments of Stravinsky’s The Soldier’s Tale. The dreamy theme II, presented by the strings treated as solo instruments and counterpointed by the celesta, turns into the above mentioned canon, followed by a virtuoso transformation and then a mirror reprise.
The second movement is initially concertante music of solo instruments or their groups selected from the entire ensemble and shaping their elegiac phrase against a background of an almost “stationary” motif of two semiquavers and a quaver with a rotationally changed first note. The “epic” part and figurative transition, resembling old, progressively changing figures with a constant base in the form of the initial note, are followed by a mysterious “murmuring” fragment based on trills played by serially entering strings – from cellos (con sordino, ppp) to divided violins (con sordino, sul tasto, pp), as a result of which the composer achieves the effect of “diagonal” movement across the sound space. The fragment – complemented by a delicate tremolo of the snare drum and the timpani, delicate strokes of the celesta and trails of the trumpets – is an example of the composer’s unique impressionism, in which the play of motifs and rhythms is largely replaced by a play of colours, sound planes and textures.
The third movement is a veritable kaleidoscope of ideas, of events following one another, if threads from the past (ostinatos, pendular figures, parallel runs) as well as those that are completely new. They include the appearance of another “protagonist” – the xylophone. However, there is some order in the ideas, combining the concertante form with a form that has features of a sonata rondo.
Music for Strings, Trumpets and Percussion is dedicated to Jan Krenz. Under his baton the Polish Radio and Television Symphony Orchestra performed the work for the first time on 14 September 1959 at the Warsaw Autumn International Festival of Contemporary Music. In 1960 the piece was ranked third (the highest score among orchestral pieces) at the International Rostrum of Composers in Paris.
There have been many choreographic versions of the work. They include Quadrige by Pierre du Villard (1965), Witness of Innocence by David Earle (1967) and Three Pieces by Hans van Manen, prepared in 1968 for the Nederlands Dans Theater and revived since by other companies. In 1988 van Manen’s choreography was also presented at Warsaw’s Teatr Wielki by the Polish company. [bacewicz.polmic.pl]
Art by Ewelina Skowronska Grażyna Bacewicz - Music for Strings, Trumpets and Percussion](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/s5u0gnORanw/mqdefault.jpg)