@Evolution2
  @Evolution2
Evolution 2.0 | Michael Behe, father of “irreducible complexity,” vs. natural genetic engineering @Evolution2 | Uploaded December 2019 | Updated October 2024, 14 hours ago.
Michael Behe infuriated traditional Darwinists with his concept of irreducible complexity more than 20 years ago. He argues instead for Intelligent Design. But what does ID really mean? Is it a puff of smoke? A perfectly executed pool shot at the start of the Big Bang? External intervention at various points along the way? Intrinsic cellular intelligence? Perry Marshall and Michael Behe discuss where to draw the dotted line.

Please "Like" This Video & Subscribe To The Channel So You Never Miss A Future Video From Evolution 2.0.

Download The First 3 Chapters of Evolution 2.0 For Free, Here - evo-2.org/3-free-chapters

Where Did Life And The Genetic Code Come From? Can The Answer Build Superior AI? The #1 Mystery In Science Now Has A $10 Million Prize. Learn More About It, Here - herox.com/evolution2.0

For More Information About Evolution 2.0 And The $10 Million Dollar Prize, Please Visit evo2.org
Michael Behe, father of “irreducible complexity,” vs. natural genetic engineeringMarketing Consultant Perry Marshall talks Evolution 2.0 with Dan & AmyError Corrections in DNA pt 1: Guard Against Random MutationsFlawed Designs and Vestigial OrgansJerry Coyne Rebuttal: What he Doesnt Want You to Know | Evolution DebateQuantum Entanglement, Psychic Phenomena and Consciousness with Dean RadinPurpose and Theology in CodesWhy cant we have a civilized dialogue about evolution?Darwinists and Creationists: Are They Both Wrong?Meeting Grendel’s Mother in the Spiritual SwampAre Evolution And Intelligent Design Connected? This Video Reveals The Answer...Detecting Cancer at Stage Negative One - Perry Marshall at SBMT

Michael Behe, father of “irreducible complexity,” vs. natural genetic engineering @Evolution2

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER