@TheCounselofTrent
@TheCounselofTrent
The Counsel of Trent | Matt Dillahunty and "Claims aren't evidence" (REBUTTED) @TheCounselofTrent | Uploaded 1 year ago | Updated 1 hour ago
In this episode Trent responds to atheist Matt Dillahunty's claim that "claims aren't evidence" when used against doctrines like the Resurrection.

To support this podcast: patreon.com/counseloftrent
To read transcripts: catholic.com/audio/cot
Matt Dillahunty and Claims arent evidence (REBUTTED)The Disgusting End of the Slippery SlopeCalvinism and Catholicism (w/ Redeemed Zoomer)The Emptiness of Liberal ChristianityDEBATE: Does Inerrant Scripture Need an Infallible Tradition? (Gordon vs. Christie)Marian Dogma Refutes Muslim and Secular Critics of the Virgin BirthHow Scandal Unravels Protestantisms Eternal SecurityOne Christian Truth Calvinists CANT SAYThe False Christ of Fr. Richard RohrWhy I don’t care if I’m “h0m0ph0bic” #counseloftrent #podcast #catholic #christianThe (Heretical) Reason Leftists Coddle CriminalsAre Jehovah’s Witnesses Christian? #counseloftrent #jehovahwitnesses #catholic #christian

Matt Dillahunty and "Claims aren't evidence" (REBUTTED) @TheCounselofTrent

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER