Uploaded January 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
The Sport of Remote Viewing: As Told by a Minor Leaguer
Lyrysa Smith
Remote viewing (RV) is real. We have data, evidence, studies, and transcripts that show that it works -- a lot of the time. Could RV work more of the time if we could better understand how a remote viewer senses it? I’ve had beginner’s luck and major slumps. I’ll show you some hits and misses. I’m trying to get more hits and fewer misses.
It’s accepted that most remote viewers experience beginner’s luck and then settle into a batting average. My first session of RV, I didn’t know what I was doing. I thought, “What the heck? Let’s give it a try.” When Garret Moddel learned that I was a good hypnosis subject, he had a hunch. He explained RV to me in a few minutes. I got three targets, and I got three home runs. I was batting 1000.
But like baseball, RV is full of vicissitudes. My next at-bats were kinda-hits and a bunch of strikeouts. Right away, my challenge became consistency. That’s confusing and frustrating. And it is also exciting, because I’m committed. The next home run can happen the next time I’m up. But how do I prepare myself to get a hit?
I’m a former competitive swimmer. I trained for RV like an athlete. Practice more, get coached, work hard. I took RV classes, read books and papers, sought advice, and I still practice yoga and meditation. I learned several RV methods, but inconsistency remains.
I understand that even the best achievers fail. It’s part of the game. I study my own sessions to derive some inkling of what works for me. What did the hit feel like on the way to getting the target right? What did the kinda-hit or miss feel like? Are there any clues in my confidence or stress levels? I’ll share those transcripts and how they felt.
Perhaps we need a better way to decipher a hit in RV. The judging is tricky and often subjective. The best hitters in baseball average 3 out of 10. Ty Cobb holds the record with .366. If remote viewers get hits 3.5 times out of 10 attempts (and many do better than that), then mainstream science should finally agree that psi is valid. Personally, like in baseball, I believe there’s value in the base hits of RV, and the home runs.
I’m seeking to bring beginner’s luck every time I go to bat. If I’m open and willing, can I capture a beginner’s mind anytime? Maybe the fluctuations aren’t always due to my ability. Is the psychic force a steady stream or does it wane? Maybe the psychic pitcher throws curveballs?
Perhaps the magic of beginner’s luck is whimsy, unawareness, just swinging for the fences with no preconceived notions. Simply describe the first thing that pops into mind. I’m curious. I love to have the image surprise me. Sometimes it works. Like hitting a small round object coming at you at 100 mph with a wooden stick less than 3 inches wide.
Lyrysa Smith is an award-winning journalist and documentary filmmaker, having worked at ABC News, PBS, A&E, the History Channel, and others, and recently a caregiver. She is the author of A Normal Life: A Sister’s Odyssey Through Brain Injury, which tells the story of her older sister’s severe brain injury from carbon monoxide poisoning and its impact on the family. Lyrysa also writes about science, health, the environment, nature, and ordinary people with extraordinary stories. An English major at Stanford, she studied at the University of Zimbabwe while working in Southern Africa. Website and blog: lyrysasmith.com.
---
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCEIXmabw_UhSWTvTS6ftsuA/join
Support the Society’s commitment to maintain an open professional forum for researchers at the edge of conventional science: https://linktr.ee/scientificexploration
The SSE provides a forum for original research into cutting edge and unconventional areas. Views and opinions belong only to the speakers, and are not necessarily endorsed by the SSE.
The Sport of Remote Viewing: As Told by a Minor Leaguer
Lyrysa Smith
Remote viewing (RV) is real. We have data, evidence, studies, and transcripts that show that it works -- a lot of the time. Could RV work more of the time if we could better understand how a remote viewer senses it? I’ve had beginner’s luck and major slumps. I’ll show you some hits and misses. I’m trying to get more hits and fewer misses.
It’s accepted that most remote viewers experience beginner’s luck and then settle into a batting average. My first session of RV, I didn’t know what I was doing. I thought, “What the heck? Let’s give it a try.” When Garret Moddel learned that I was a good hypnosis subject, he had a hunch. He explained RV to me in a few minutes. I got three targets, and I got three home runs. I was batting 1000.
But like baseball, RV is full of vicissitudes. My next at-bats were kinda-hits and a bunch of strikeouts. Right away, my challenge became consistency. That’s confusing and frustrating. And it is also exciting, because I’m committed. The next home run can happen the next time I’m up. But how do I prepare myself to get a hit?
I’m a former competitive swimmer. I trained for RV like an athlete. Practice more, get coached, work hard. I took RV classes, read books and papers, sought advice, and I still practice yoga and meditation. I learned several RV methods, but inconsistency remains.
I understand that even the best achievers fail. It’s part of the game. I study my own sessions to derive some inkling of what works for me. What did the hit feel like on the way to getting the target right? What did the kinda-hit or miss feel like? Are there any clues in my confidence or stress levels? I’ll share those transcripts and how they felt.
Perhaps we need a better way to decipher a hit in RV. The judging is tricky and often subjective. The best hitters in baseball average 3 out of 10. Ty Cobb holds the record with .366. If remote viewers get hits 3.5 times out of 10 attempts (and many do better than that), then mainstream science should finally agree that psi is valid. Personally, like in baseball, I believe there’s value in the base hits of RV, and the home runs.
I’m seeking to bring beginner’s luck every time I go to bat. If I’m open and willing, can I capture a beginner’s mind anytime? Maybe the fluctuations aren’t always due to my ability. Is the psychic force a steady stream or does it wane? Maybe the psychic pitcher throws curveballs?
Perhaps the magic of beginner’s luck is whimsy, unawareness, just swinging for the fences with no preconceived notions. Simply describe the first thing that pops into mind. I’m curious. I love to have the image surprise me. Sometimes it works. Like hitting a small round object coming at you at 100 mph with a wooden stick less than 3 inches wide.
Lyrysa Smith is an award-winning journalist and documentary filmmaker, having worked at ABC News, PBS, A&E, the History Channel, and others, and recently a caregiver. She is the author of A Normal Life: A Sister’s Odyssey Through Brain Injury, which tells the story of her older sister’s severe brain injury from carbon monoxide poisoning and its impact on the family. Lyrysa also writes about science, health, the environment, nature, and ordinary people with extraordinary stories. An English major at Stanford, she studied at the University of Zimbabwe while working in Southern Africa. Website and blog: lyrysasmith.com.
---
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCEIXmabw_UhSWTvTS6ftsuA/join
Support the Society’s commitment to maintain an open professional forum for researchers at the edge of conventional science: https://linktr.ee/scientificexploration
The SSE provides a forum for original research into cutting edge and unconventional areas. Views and opinions belong only to the speakers, and are not necessarily endorsed by the SSE.




![From Oracles to Algorithms: Wisdom Acquisition at the Intersection of A.I. and Psi | Mark Boccuzzi
Throughout history, people have consulted with shamans, soothsayers, oracles, channelers, mediums, and psychics to gain information about the future and communicate with the dead.
One of the earliest reports of testing the accuracy of oracles comes from the story of king Croesus who ruled Lydia (what is now Turkey) from 560 to 547 BCE. Croesus asked the oracles in Greece and Libya to provide specific information about his activity on a specific day. Through this process, Croesus became convinced of the accuracy of Pythia, the Oracle of Delphi, and queried her about waging war with the Persian empire. Pythia responded that if Croesus were to go to war, he would “destroy a great empire”. Emboldened by this news, he attacked, only to learn that the “great empire” that was destroyed was his own.
Since then, psychics have been employed by governments, scientists, intelligence agencies, industries, and financial investors to provide accurate information about current and future events that elude our existing abilities to monitor and predict. However, as our technologies advance, the acquisition of seemingly inaccessible information will only become easier and less expensive.
While the study of psychic functioning and development will continue to have a role in personal growth, spirituality, and providing deeper insights into the nature of consciousness and reality, its utility as an information-gathering tool will most likely continue to be relegated to narrower and more highly specialized use cases. As information access becomes more ubiquitous, the real value in psychic functioning will be the ability to acquire wisdom from discarnate or untethered consciousness. However, the current challenge is delineating the boundaries between retrieved psychic information and the psychics’ own mental interpretation of the task and results.
To explore this problem, our lab conducted a series of trials utilizing a Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) protocol to acquire information from blinded remote viewers about the nature of what is commonly called the afterlife. These trials produced unique results that were, in some cases, even surprising to the viewers (Boccuzzi, 2021).
The current project takes the process further by entirely removing living, incarnate psychics from the process through the development and deployment of non-biological consciousness-hosting platforms. Bridging the gap between Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC), channeling, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI), this highly exploratory research program utilizes various technologies, including random number generator arrays, natural language processing chatbots, predictive text algorithms, and machine-based image generation.
To date, the system has been deployed to provide advice for the grieving and encouragement for the disenfranchised, along with providing insights into some of humanity’s most burning questions including: What can we do about climate change? What is the impact of social media interactions on modern society? How can we live up to our potential? Do we survive after the death of our bodies? Is there a God? What can we learn from UFOs? How can we close the gap between science and spirituality? Of course, as with any new technology, we need to be mindful of its strengths, weaknesses, and the potential for abuse, lest we find ourselves facing the same fate as Croesus.
This presentation will review the current technologies employed, examples of wisdom and advice provided by the system, a discussion of limitations, and future PsiBotics (Moddel, 2018) applications, including AIs capable of performing telepathic, precognitive, clairvoyant, and psychokinetic tasks.
References
Boccuzzi, M. (2021, August 11). The VISTA Program: Applying Controlled Remote Viewing to Afterlife Research [Conference session]. 2021 Windbridge Research Center Afterlife Symposium. https://youtu.be/DsHM8V6D6sk
Moddel, G. (2018, June). An Introduction to Psibotics [Conference session]. Joint Conference of the Society for Scientific Exploration and International Remote Viewing Association, Las Vegas, Nevada. https://youtu.be/WCjhPRSzm-A
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEIXmabw_UhSWTvTS6ftsuA/join
Support the Society’s commitment to maintain an open professional forum for researchers at the edge of conventional science: https://linktr.ee/scientificexploration
The SSE provides a forum for original research into cutting edge and unconventional areas. Views and opinions belong only to the speakers, and are not necessarily endorsed by the SSE. From Oracles to Algorithms: Wisdom Acquisition at the Intersection of A.I. and Psi | Mark Boccuzzi](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QuaSUdaxy18/mqdefault.jpg)





