Logic and Belief (A Response to Matt Dillahunty) @SisyphusRedeemed
Logic and Belief (A Response to Matt Dillahunty)  @SisyphusRedeemed
Uploaded December 2009 | Updated September 2026, 4 hours ago
Matt Dillahunty made a gross oversimplification about the nature of logic and how that applies to belief. I try to correct him by explaining the nature of multi-valued logics and why they serve much better in many circumstances, such as modeling the complexity of human theological beliefs.

Video I'm responding to: youtube.com/watch?v=vz1eAnOV6Ds
Logic and Belief (A Response to Matt Dillahunty)Free Will and Divine ForeknowledgeScientific Realism and Epistemic Immodesty (2 of 3)Classical Empiricism and Logical Positivism (Part 4-1)1 Answer for VeritasBadasses in (the History of) ScienceDying Without GodThe Sociology of Science:(2 of 3)reply to onetruechurchThe Problem of Induction and Russells Chicken (Lecture 5, video #1 of 3)What if Glenn Beck is Actually Mentally Retarded?Im Explaining a Few Things by Pablo Neruda
SisyphusRedeemed |

Logic and Belief (A Response to Matt Dillahunty)

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER