Uploaded December 2009 | Updated September 2026, 4 hours ago
Matt Dillahunty made a gross oversimplification about the nature of logic and how that applies to belief. I try to correct him by explaining the nature of multi-valued logics and why they serve much better in many circumstances, such as modeling the complexity of human theological beliefs.
Video I'm responding to: youtube.com/watch?v=vz1eAnOV6Ds
Matt Dillahunty made a gross oversimplification about the nature of logic and how that applies to belief. I try to correct him by explaining the nature of multi-valued logics and why they serve much better in many circumstances, such as modeling the complexity of human theological beliefs.
Video I'm responding to: youtube.com/watch?v=vz1eAnOV6Ds










