Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
DraftScience
|
Live 10-25-25... Heat is momentum
🔇 TAP TO UNMUTE
![Live 7-30-26 : [127] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic vs Sheepil physics... mv = Energy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mC9wFCK30gE/mqdefault.jpg "Live 7-30-26 : [127] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic vs Sheepil physics... mv = Energy
https://www.reddit.com/r/PhysicsIsBadLogic/
Physics isnt the science its a silly religion full of jihading practitioners who care nothing for the truth and the ohonest practices that are its acquisition. A substantial part of physics is silly made up mush... Some of it can fairly be compared to believing in hobgoblins... But no reasonable person can fairly challenge that mush without being silenced and abused... No fair trial, no fair arguments, just lies and distortions.
email: ds@donotgo.com
debatephysics.com: http://www.efilism.com/pi/
Profiles in Cowardice: http://www.efilism.com/ds/wpm.html
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
subjects: • Playlist
All Playlists: / draftscience
Start here: • Start Here
Questions Playlist: • Playlist
http://draftphysics.com/
http://donotgo.com/in/ds/index.html
#KineticEnergy #theoreticalphysics")
![Live 6-12-26 : [95] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic ... mv = Energy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mQYKaVtL0NU/mqdefault.jpg "Live 6-12-26 : [95] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic ... mv = Energy
https://www.reddit.com/r/PhysicsIsBadLogic/
Physics isnt the science its a silly religion full of jihading practitioners who care nothing for the truth and the ohonest practices that are its acquisition. A substantial part of physics is silly made up mush... Some of it can fairly be compared to believing in hobgoblins... But no reasonable person can fairly challenge that mush without being silenced and abused... No fair trial, no fair arguments, just lies and distortions.
email: ds@donotgo.com
debatephysics.com: http://www.efilism.com/pi/
Profiles in Cowardice: http://www.efilism.com/ds/wpm.html
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
subjects: • Playlist
All Playlists: / draftscience
Start here: • Start Here
Questions Playlist: • Playlist
http://draftphysics.com/
http://donotgo.com/in/ds/index.html
#KineticEnergy #theoreticalphysics")
![Live 2-7-26 : [8] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic ...stupid dishonest comments](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/maCKXcDzqNw/mqdefault.jpg "Live 2-7-26 : [8] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic ...stupid dishonest comments
https://www.reddit.com/r/PhysicsIsBadLogic/
Physics isnt the science its a silly religion full of jihading practitioners who care nothing for the truth and the honest practices that are its acquisition. A substantial part of physics is silly made up mush... Some of it can fairly be compared to believing in hobgoblins... But no reasonable person can fairly challenge that mush without being silenced and abused... No fair trial, no fair arguments, just lies and distortions.
email: ds@donotgo.com
debatephysics.com: http://www.efilism.com/pi/
Profiles in Cowardice: http://www.efilism.com/ds/wpm.html
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
subjects: • Playlist
All Playlists: / draftscience
Start here: • Start Here
Questions Playlist: • Playlist
http://draftphysics.com/
http://donotgo.com/in/ds/index.html
#KineticEnergy #theoreticalphysics")
![Live 8-30-26 : [148] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic vs Sheepil physics... mv = Energy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nXz7rTzS-Es/mqdefault.jpg "Live 8-30-26 : [148] Reddit PhysicsIsBadLogic vs Sheepil physics... mv = Energy
https://www.reddit.com/r/PhysicsIsBadLogic/
Physics isnt the science its a silly religion full of jihading practitioners who care nothing for the truth and the ohonest practices that are its acquisition. A substantial part of physics is silly made up mush... Some of it can fairly be compared to believing in hobgoblins... But no reasonable person can fairly challenge that mush without being silenced and abused... No fair trial, no fair arguments, just lies and distortions.
email: ds@donotgo.com
debatephysics.com: http://www.efilism.com/pi/
Profiles in Cowardice: http://www.efilism.com/ds/wpm.html
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
1/2 vmv
Was willfully created to Force reality to match religious daydreams. The history of its creation, defense, and eventual acceptance is a mockery of the scientific method. Truth was forsaken for agenda, evidence was exaggerated distorted and quote mined to support a plainly silly notion of reality...
If Im in space and I throw a 2 L bottle of coke (2 kg) away from me at 1mph., do I received the same thrust if I shoot a dime (2 grams) away from me at 1000mph.? If so isnt this proof against the kinetic energy formula?
Is there any physical evidence defending the kinetic energy theorem? The theory says an 8 lb bowling ball will produce twice as much energy as a 16 pound ball thrown with the same effort. No pro bowler can make A lighter ball work. Why?
If I shoot two objects with inverse velocity to Mass ratios (for exp. 10m 5v vs 5m 10v) into gravity your formula says one object will have twice as much energy as the other at liftoff. If I let the objects fall, on an identical spring they will be recorded to impose the same pressure, the same joules of energy. How do you reconcile that fact with your theory? or Do you dispute the fact?
Your theory says a 5-ton train going 10 miles an hour has twice as much energy ability to do work as a 10 ton going 5 miles an hour. I claim you will never prove that to be true, and that if you actually collected the energy of the moving objects in a scientifically sensible manor it will be clearly demonstrated that they have the same capacity to do work.
Do you think a 5-ton 10 miles an hour train can do twice as much work has a 10 ton train going 5 miles an hour? Do you think you can create heat or deformation and transfer 100% of your momentum to another object?
subjects: • Playlist
All Playlists: / draftscience
Start here: • Start Here
Questions Playlist: • Playlist
http://draftphysics.com/
http://donotgo.com/in/ds/index.html
#KineticEnergy #theoreticalphysics")
