Uploaded September 2022 | Updated September 2026, 2 days ago
Surprise! BYU found no evidence of racial slurs at volleyball game - All signs point to the BYU-Duke volleyball incident being just another hate crime hoax. Add it to the list with Jussie Smollett's run-in with MAGA hat-wearing, bleach-pouring racists outside a Chicago subway, Bubba Wallace's terrifying encounter with a noose in a NASCAR garage, or a Colorado Rockies fan's injudicious shouting of a racial slur at a black batter. Duke University volleyball player Rachel Richardson claimed after a match against Brigham Young University two weeks ago that a member of the BYU student section was repeatedly calling her the N-word while she was serving. The only problem? There's no evidence of that at all.
Establishment media propagated another racism hoax-
Brigham Young University has found no evidence that a racial slur was yelled at Duke volleyball player Rachel Richardson, meaning establishment media once again jumped on a racial hoax without waiting for evidence.
BYU interviewed 50 eyewitnesses and reviewed “security and raw footage from all camera angles taken by BYUtv of the match.” The university had put four ushers, a police officer, and a Duke assistant athletic director in the student section after Duke’s coach relayed Richardson’s accusation of a slur being used. Richardson said the slurs were louder in the fourth set of the match, yet none of the people placed in the student section heard them, nor did the students or Duke’s players aside from Richardson.
Of course, Richardson didn’t hear them either — because they were never said. This has become completely clear. The fan Richardson singled out as having used the slurs was shown on video not to have said them, and BYU has now lifted the ban it initially placed on him. Not one person in the sold-out school-record crowd of 5,507 could vouch for Richardson’s claims: not the fans, not security, not her own teammates.
It didn’t matter to establishment media, which treated this as true from the moment the accusation was made. CNN, ESPN, NPR, ABC, NBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post all reported the nonexistent slurs as fact without bothering to look into the accusation and find out if it was true. (We used to call that “journalism.”) Jemele Hill, the Atlantic’s go-to race-baiter, predictably pushed the false claim.
USA Today’s Mike Freeman, the less successful version of Hill, went even further. After police determined that no slur was said after reviewing the video, Freeman declared that anyone who doubted Richardson’s claim was a conspiracy theorist. And South Carolina women’s basketball coach Dawn Staley continued the despicable trend of turning women’s basketball into a progressive political tool, canceling games with BYU over slurs that were never used.
Nothing will be learned from this, just as nothing was learned over Jussie Smollett’s hate crime hoax or Bubba Wallace’s noose hoax or the Colorado Rockies slur hoax. Establishment media are desperate for anything that perpetuates their narrative of racism running rampant in America, even if that means taking fake stories and presenting them as true, regardless of silly things like “facts” or “evidence.”
None of the journalists or pundits who pushed this hoax should be employed, but they will face no consequences for this. This is what their outlets incentivize them to do. The media demand for racism dwarves the supply, and so these media figures and their outlets will dutifully jump on the next racial hoax with all the enthusiasm they did for this one.
#fakenews #bias #hoax
Surprise! BYU found no evidence of racial slurs at volleyball game - All signs point to the BYU-Duke volleyball incident being just another hate crime hoax. Add it to the list with Jussie Smollett's run-in with MAGA hat-wearing, bleach-pouring racists outside a Chicago subway, Bubba Wallace's terrifying encounter with a noose in a NASCAR garage, or a Colorado Rockies fan's injudicious shouting of a racial slur at a black batter. Duke University volleyball player Rachel Richardson claimed after a match against Brigham Young University two weeks ago that a member of the BYU student section was repeatedly calling her the N-word while she was serving. The only problem? There's no evidence of that at all.
Establishment media propagated another racism hoax-
Brigham Young University has found no evidence that a racial slur was yelled at Duke volleyball player Rachel Richardson, meaning establishment media once again jumped on a racial hoax without waiting for evidence.
BYU interviewed 50 eyewitnesses and reviewed “security and raw footage from all camera angles taken by BYUtv of the match.” The university had put four ushers, a police officer, and a Duke assistant athletic director in the student section after Duke’s coach relayed Richardson’s accusation of a slur being used. Richardson said the slurs were louder in the fourth set of the match, yet none of the people placed in the student section heard them, nor did the students or Duke’s players aside from Richardson.
Of course, Richardson didn’t hear them either — because they were never said. This has become completely clear. The fan Richardson singled out as having used the slurs was shown on video not to have said them, and BYU has now lifted the ban it initially placed on him. Not one person in the sold-out school-record crowd of 5,507 could vouch for Richardson’s claims: not the fans, not security, not her own teammates.
It didn’t matter to establishment media, which treated this as true from the moment the accusation was made. CNN, ESPN, NPR, ABC, NBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post all reported the nonexistent slurs as fact without bothering to look into the accusation and find out if it was true. (We used to call that “journalism.”) Jemele Hill, the Atlantic’s go-to race-baiter, predictably pushed the false claim.
USA Today’s Mike Freeman, the less successful version of Hill, went even further. After police determined that no slur was said after reviewing the video, Freeman declared that anyone who doubted Richardson’s claim was a conspiracy theorist. And South Carolina women’s basketball coach Dawn Staley continued the despicable trend of turning women’s basketball into a progressive political tool, canceling games with BYU over slurs that were never used.
Nothing will be learned from this, just as nothing was learned over Jussie Smollett’s hate crime hoax or Bubba Wallace’s noose hoax or the Colorado Rockies slur hoax. Establishment media are desperate for anything that perpetuates their narrative of racism running rampant in America, even if that means taking fake stories and presenting them as true, regardless of silly things like “facts” or “evidence.”
None of the journalists or pundits who pushed this hoax should be employed, but they will face no consequences for this. This is what their outlets incentivize them to do. The media demand for racism dwarves the supply, and so these media figures and their outlets will dutifully jump on the next racial hoax with all the enthusiasm they did for this one.
#fakenews #bias #hoax



![House Oversight Committee Exposes Biden Crime Family In Powerful Press Conference
Surrounded by his Republican colleagues on Capitol Hill, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., confirmed that the Oversight Committee is now investigating President Biden and his familys shady business deals that capitalize on Joe Bidens public office and risked our countrys national security. Comer further detailed new information investigators have uncovered regarding the transfer of money from foreign entities to the Biden family. Many of the alleged wire payments occurred while Biden was then vice president.
The committee has reviewed thousands of bank records from individuals and companies affiliated with the Bidens and their associates, Comer said in Wednesday’s press conference. Chinese nationals affiliated with the Bidens created limited liability companies in the United States, and then in a short period of time, transferred their interest to a Chinese company that sent money to the Bidens. This is not normal. Hunter Biden and his associates did business in countries that correlated directly with Joe Bidens work as vice president. This is also not normal. It is not ethical.
Ron Johnson on Biden family schemes
- GOP senator signals huge body of evidence against Biden family shows how clear the corruption is - House GOP says Biden family received millions from foreigners, tried to hide source
The volume of evidence is clear, it makes clear the corruption within these agencies, but it also makes clear the corruption of the mainstream media who will largely ignore and minimize it, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said Wednesday on Mornings with Maria just before the briefing.
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., says the House Oversight Committee has the evidence implicating Joe and Hunter Biden in a vast web of foreign financial entanglements on Mornings with Maria on Wednesday.
Evidence lays out a vast web of foreign financial entanglements, according to Johnson, who also acknowledged this investigation isn’t easy.
People that commit criminal acts try not to leave a paper trail. So its very difficult to piece this all together, particularly when you have the leftists, the progressives and the mainstream media doing everything they can to undermine your investigation, the senator said.
The entire Biden family had reportedly received $10 million from foreign nationals and their various companies, Comer additionally noted in Wednesday’s briefing.
New York Post columnist Miranda Devine discusses revelations in the Hunter Biden investigation and a new report revealing Joe Biden bribery allegations were brought to the DOJ five years ago on The Evening Edit. video
Whistleblower alleges bribery scheme involving Joe Biden was brought to DOJ in 2018
New York Post columnist Miranda Devine discusses revelations in the Hunter Biden investigation and a new report revealing Joe Biden bribery allegations were brought to the DOJ five years ago on The Evening Edit.
On the bank records, youre not going to see [a] bribe to change this policy. You have to infer whats happening here. You have to take a look at the bulk of the evidence. You have to follow the money and realize: so what did this Biden family member do to earn that amount of money? Johnson explained.
While neither the Senate nor House has the power to indict or federally charge individuals, Johnson noted the Oversight Committee’s job is to piece together the information for the FBI and Department of Justice.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discusses the GOPs investigation into Hunter Biden ahead of a possible indictment on Varney & Co. video
Hunter Bidens alleged money laundering scheme is an extraordinary scandal: Tom Fitton
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discusses the GOPs investigation into Hunter Biden ahead of a possible indictment on Varney & Co.
My guess is the media will do the exact same thing that they did to Chuck Grassley and I when we sent overwhelming evidence of the vast financial entanglements of the Bidens and would compromise a president, theyll just say, ‘Oh, theres no proof of a crime here,’ Johnson told host Maria Bartiromo.
You can say its circumstantial. You dont have these people writing on a piece of paper, ‘10% to Vice President Biden.’ They do it cryptically, 10% to the big guy, he continued. Thats how criminals operate. They do it cryptically.
#mediabias #hunterbiden #laptopfromhell House Oversight Committee Exposes Biden Crime Family In Powerful Press Conference](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k_yGc1-mfos/mqdefault.jpg)
![Huge Compilation - People Who Dismissed Covid Lab Leak As Conspiracy, Racist, Debunked & Not Likely
They Called It A Conspiracy Theory, Debunked, Racist, Misinformation, Highly Unlikely, Etc. ...Starring The Misinformation Experts: Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, Fareed Zakaria, Chris Hayes, The Young Turks, CNN, MSNBC, Facebook, Twitter, New York Times, Washington Post, etc…And those who got it right: Trump, Tom Cotton, Mike Pompeo, Tucker Carlson, Greg Gutfeld, Hannity, Maria Bartiromo and more! …Another Case Against Misinformation Bans.
U.S. Energy Department Now Says Lab Leak Most Likely Origin of Covid-19 Pandemic, and FBI agrees. Rand Paul says Biden should declassify docs after Energy Department reversal. The Energy Department, which had been undecided on the origin of the pandemic, now joins the FBI in concluding the coronavirus likely spread due to a mishap at a Chinese laboratory, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing a classified intelligence report provided to the White House and key members of Congress. The so-called lab leak theory, according to which the virus came from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, was widely dismissed as a conspiracy theory and misinformation by Democrats, major news outlets, scientists, and social media companies in the early stages of the pandemic.
Paul was hardly the only Republican lawmakers to call for answers and accountability following news of the Energy Departments assessment.
Congressional Republicans quickly took to Twitter, demanding apologies from those who dismissed the lab leak theory and for China to be held accountable.
The development, which was noted in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril Hainess office, prompted Paul to call for greater transparency.
Classified documents leaked (they should be declassified!) showing scientists at DOE believe COVID leaked from Wuhan Lab, Paul tweeted, calling for greater transparency.
Beyond the FBI and Energy Department, the National Intelligence Council and four other agencies assess at low confidence that the COVID-19 pandemic originated due to natural transmission from an infected animal, while the CIA and another unnamed agency are undecided, according to the Wall Street Journal.
FBI Director Christopher Wray said the COVID-19 pandemic was likely caused by a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan, Wray told Fox News in an interview that aired Tuesday. Here you are talking about a potential leak from a Chinese government-controlled lab.
I will just make the observation that the Chinese government, it seems to me, has been doing its best to try to thwart and obfuscate the work here, the work that were doing, the work that our U.S. government and close foreign partners are doing. And thats unfortunate for everybody, he added.
Wray said the FBI has specialists who focus on the dangers of biological threats, which include things like novel viruses like COVID, and the concerns that they [are] in the wrong hands [of] some bad guys, a hostile nation state, a terrorist, a criminal.
#fakenews #bias #gaslighting Huge Compilation - People Who Dismissed Covid Lab Leak As Conspiracy, Racist, Debunked & Not Likely](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/l1SgwNfehqI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Why Trying To Ban AR-15s Doesnt Make Sense
A string of high-profile mass shootings over the past few years has spawned a movement to outlaw so-called assault weapons, in particular the popular AR-15. On January 9, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D–Calif.) introduced a federal bill to ban assault weapons—legislation thats been depicted as life-saving, common sense policy. But its definition of an assault weapon is totally arbitrary.
Proposals like Feinsteins latest draft bill leave shooters with plenty of equally deadly alternatives.
An assault weapon is whatever is covered by an assault weapon ban, says Reason Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, author of a feature story on the topic in our June 2018 issue. The criteria that are used to identify assault weapons are things that have little or nothing to do with how useful or how deadly an assault weapon is in the hands of a mass murderer.
The federal government banned assault weapons in 1994, when President Bill Clinton signed a bill also sponsored by Sen. Feinstein. That legislation expired 10 years later. Meanwhile, seven states and the District of Columbia have enacted their own assault weapon bans.
Theres little evidence that the 1994 legislation reduced gun deaths, in part because it was mostly a symbolic gesture.
Unless you really delve into the specifics of what these bills do, you dont understand how utterly arbitrary they are, says Sullum.
In both the original 1994 bill and the new version of the legislation, assault weapons are classified not by what they do but by how they look.
Assault weapon bans typically use criteria like pistol grips, adjustable stocks, threaded barrels, and barrels shrouds to determine whether or not a gun is an assault weapon. These features are cosmetic.
You can have a gun with any one of those features and it is now an assault weapon, says Sullum. Exactly the same gun without those features is not an assault weapon. And in fact, there are a bunch of examples like that.
To illustrate this point, compare the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle with the AR-15. One looks like a hunting rifle and the other looks like a military weapon. Although the rifles have different manufacturers and lineages, for all practical purposes they are identical. They fire at the same rate, they can fire the same caliber of ammunition, and because they have similar barrel lengths, the ballistics are almost identical. But only one is an assault weapon.
Another misconception is that assault weapons are automatic firearms, which fire continuously until the trigger is released or the gun runs out of ammunition. The federal government banned the manufacture of new automatic weapons for civilian use in 1986.
Most modern civilian guns are semi-automatic, which means they only fire one round per trigger pull.
But if youre talking about how many rounds you get out of the gun within a certain amount of time, says Sullum, any semi-automatic is gonna fire be capable of firing the same number of rounds.
Another myth is that assault weapons are more powerful than other guns. In reality, the power of a firearm depends mainly on the cartridge, not the gun. Again, compare the Ruger Mini-14 Ranch Rifle with the AR-15. Both shoot the same .223 caliber bullet, at the same velocity.
You will see that lots of hunting rifles are more powerful [and] can do more damage at the same distance than so-called assault weapons, says Sullum.
One of the most common cartridges used for hunting is the .308 Winchester, which has more than double the impact force when compared to the ammunition used in an AR-15.
Another common refrain is that assault weapons can fire more rounds than other guns before reloading. But its the magazine, which is just a detachable box and a spring, that determines how many times you can fire. And many guns that are not identified as assault weapons accept high-capacity magazines.
You can get high-capacity magazines or large-capacity magazines, meaning holding more than 10 rounds…for guns that are not considered to be assault weapons, says Sullum. So again, this is not a feature that distinguishes assault weapons from other kinds of guns.
Banning guns solely based on appearance is counterproductive. It makes it difficult to have a good-faith discussion about effective solutions to gun violence.
Im not going to say everyone should own an AR-15, says Sullum, but people have their reasons for wanting to have them and the government shouldnt be second-guessing those reasons without a very powerful justification. And the justification offered for banning assault weapons is virtually nonexistent because it doesnt make sense.
#guncontrol #selfdefense #constitution Why Trying To Ban AR-15s Doesnt Make Sense](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lGAsTV8G9Jk/mqdefault.jpg)




