@IDquest
  @IDquest
IDquest | Lawrence Krauss Is Bad for Science @IDquest | Uploaded October 2020 | Updated October 2024, 15 hours ago.
#intelligentdesign #evolution #williamlanecraig #lawrencekrauss #bvgtheorem #physics #astronomy

William Lane Craig discusses his debate with Lawrence Krauss. It ends up Krauss deliberately lied about the contents of a letter he was given by Alexander Vilenkin on the Borde Guth Vilenkin Theorem (or the BVG Theorem). More details here:
reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/honesty-transparency-full-disclosure-and-the-borde-guth-vilenkin-theorem
Lawrence Krauss Is Bad for ScienceHow Should We Think About Gods Existence? - William Dembski, PhDA Marvel More Fascinating Than Your iPhone #intelligentdesign #evolutionDid God Create Evil? (William Dembski)Intelligent Design: Yesterdays Orthodoxy, Todays Heresy (William A. Dembski)Richard Dawkins is Scared of William Lane CraigThink It Through with Dr. Walter BradleyIs Science Against Religion? - J. P. Moreland, PhDSetting the Record Straight with Caroline CrockerTheistic Implications of Big Bang Cosmology - Stephen Meyer, PhDThe Best Evidence for Evolution - Phillip E. JohnsonIrreducible Complexity: the interview w/ Michael Behe

Lawrence Krauss Is Bad for Science @IDquest

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER