Uploaded May 2020 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
It has recently come to my attention that there is a LVS channel disputing the first shots time line, and is incorrectly using body language in one of the street cams to justify this theory.
In this video I will establish why it is so important to use factual evidence, like a common video marker between two pieces of footage, and not something as subjective as body language, to solidify any given theory in research. Assumptions do none of us any good.
When all video/audio is synced perfectly, the fact remains:
First shots = 10:05:26 PM/Breach #1 = 11:19:56 PM
Thank you to this channel for attempting to think outside the box, and I can always appreciate anyone challenging my research, but please be respectful when doing so. My research is always data driven/ and therefore fact based.
I do not follow any narrative. Data is the only unbiased truth.
It has recently come to my attention that there is a LVS channel disputing the first shots time line, and is incorrectly using body language in one of the street cams to justify this theory.
In this video I will establish why it is so important to use factual evidence, like a common video marker between two pieces of footage, and not something as subjective as body language, to solidify any given theory in research. Assumptions do none of us any good.
When all video/audio is synced perfectly, the fact remains:
First shots = 10:05:26 PM/Breach #1 = 11:19:56 PM
Thank you to this channel for attempting to think outside the box, and I can always appreciate anyone challenging my research, but please be respectful when doing so. My research is always data driven/ and therefore fact based.
I do not follow any narrative. Data is the only unbiased truth.
