Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
00:00 Docket
00:57 Intro
02:44 Karmelo Anthony Scores “Small Victory”
08:08 Tupac Trial Turns Emotional as Jury Sees Autopsy Photos
11:42 Defense Expert: Lindsay Clancy Was Psychotic
20:23 Charlie Kirk Death-Penalty Fight
23:30 Murder Case Against Divorce Attorney
26:10 Legal History — August 19
27:50 Questions
34:14 Dumb Criminal
Karmelo Anthony has scored a significant procedural victory in his fight for a new trial.
The Texas judge who presided over Anthony’s murder trial, State District Judge John Roach Jr., has been recused from the case after Anthony’s new legal team argued that Roach’s post-trial comments and other actions raised questions about whether he could fairly consider allegations that serious mistakes occurred during the original trial. Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the recusal Wednesday, and Judge Michael B. Chitty has now been assigned to the case.
Anthony, now 19, was convicted in June of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a confrontation at a high-school track meet in Frisco, Texas. Jurors rejected Anthony’s self-defense argument, and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison.
Anthony’s new attorneys are now asking for the entire conviction to be set aside and a new trial granted. Among their arguments are allegations involving restrictions on public and media access to the courtroom, rulings affecting Anthony’s defense, and disputes surrounding what evidence could be presented to jurors. The defense also focused heavily on a television interview Roach gave shortly after the verdict in which he defended the trial and indicated agreement with the jury’s decision.
But this is an important distinction: Karmelo Anthony has NOT been granted a new trial. His murder conviction and 35-year sentence remain in place.
What he has won is the first major battle in his post-trial challenge: the judge deciding whether serious errors occurred during John Roach’s trial will no longer be John Roach himself.
Scott Reisch breaks down what the judge’s removal means, the arguments Anthony’s attorneys are making, and whether any of them could actually be enough to get Karmelo Anthony back in front of another jury.
What do you think? Was removing Judge Roach the right decision — and does Anthony have a legitimate argument for a new trial?
🛍️ CRIME TALK SHOP & PARTNERS
Crime Talk Store: crimetalknetwork.com/shop
Run a Background Check: crimetalksearch.com
Emergency Food Supply: rqzttm8trk.com/3Z38RPR/S5HJNJ
Amazon Favorites: amazon.com/shop/crimetalk
🛡️ OFFICIAL DISCOUNT CODES
Police Magnum — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off
Invisawear Jewelry — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off
Baked in Colorado — 40% off Pet CBD: bakedincolorado.com
🤝 JOIN THE COMMUNITY
Patreon (exclusive content): patreon.com/crimetalk
Official site: scottreisch.com
X (Twitter): @CrimeTalkPod
Instagram / TikTok: @CrimeTalkWithScottReisch
Miss Winnie (IG/TikTok): @MissWinnieTheBulldog
LEGAL VAULT
Fair Use: Clips may be used for commentary, criticism, and educational purposes (see Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) and Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)).
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. I’m a lawyer — but I’m not your lawyer. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship.
Business inquiries: CrimeTalk@ReischLawFirm.com
1490 West 121st Ave., Suite 202, Denver, CO 80234
#TrueCrime
00:00 Docket
00:57 Intro
02:44 Karmelo Anthony Scores “Small Victory”
08:08 Tupac Trial Turns Emotional as Jury Sees Autopsy Photos
11:42 Defense Expert: Lindsay Clancy Was Psychotic
20:23 Charlie Kirk Death-Penalty Fight
23:30 Murder Case Against Divorce Attorney
26:10 Legal History — August 19
27:50 Questions
34:14 Dumb Criminal
Karmelo Anthony has scored a significant procedural victory in his fight for a new trial.
The Texas judge who presided over Anthony’s murder trial, State District Judge John Roach Jr., has been recused from the case after Anthony’s new legal team argued that Roach’s post-trial comments and other actions raised questions about whether he could fairly consider allegations that serious mistakes occurred during the original trial. Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the recusal Wednesday, and Judge Michael B. Chitty has now been assigned to the case.
Anthony, now 19, was convicted in June of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a confrontation at a high-school track meet in Frisco, Texas. Jurors rejected Anthony’s self-defense argument, and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison.
Anthony’s new attorneys are now asking for the entire conviction to be set aside and a new trial granted. Among their arguments are allegations involving restrictions on public and media access to the courtroom, rulings affecting Anthony’s defense, and disputes surrounding what evidence could be presented to jurors. The defense also focused heavily on a television interview Roach gave shortly after the verdict in which he defended the trial and indicated agreement with the jury’s decision.
But this is an important distinction: Karmelo Anthony has NOT been granted a new trial. His murder conviction and 35-year sentence remain in place.
What he has won is the first major battle in his post-trial challenge: the judge deciding whether serious errors occurred during John Roach’s trial will no longer be John Roach himself.
Scott Reisch breaks down what the judge’s removal means, the arguments Anthony’s attorneys are making, and whether any of them could actually be enough to get Karmelo Anthony back in front of another jury.
What do you think? Was removing Judge Roach the right decision — and does Anthony have a legitimate argument for a new trial?
🛍️ CRIME TALK SHOP & PARTNERS
Crime Talk Store: crimetalknetwork.com/shop
Run a Background Check: crimetalksearch.com
Emergency Food Supply: rqzttm8trk.com/3Z38RPR/S5HJNJ
Amazon Favorites: amazon.com/shop/crimetalk
🛡️ OFFICIAL DISCOUNT CODES
Police Magnum — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off
Invisawear Jewelry — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off
Baked in Colorado — 40% off Pet CBD: bakedincolorado.com
🤝 JOIN THE COMMUNITY
Patreon (exclusive content): patreon.com/crimetalk
Official site: scottreisch.com
X (Twitter): @CrimeTalkPod
Instagram / TikTok: @CrimeTalkWithScottReisch
Miss Winnie (IG/TikTok): @MissWinnieTheBulldog
LEGAL VAULT
Fair Use: Clips may be used for commentary, criticism, and educational purposes (see Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) and Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)).
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. I’m a lawyer — but I’m not your lawyer. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship.
Business inquiries: CrimeTalk@ReischLawFirm.com
1490 West 121st Ave., Suite 202, Denver, CO 80234
#TrueCrime
