Uploaded February 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Getting that bug again to try something different. Sorry this is only one parameter set of a comparison, My normal PA vs Non-Linear Recipr. Not much difference, but some.
I like top down tests vs vertical for some things. Let me see if I can change it up a bit and see what changes what.
Which one looks better to you?
ABS, 43mm3s flow, .3 layer height, .5 line width.
No, I didn't tune these values, I used some values I saw someone else use as a test, and tried them as is. This at least give me a baseline from linear PA.
The positions I am looking at are the decel and accel points of the model. The gaps and the height change from filament stacking too much material in the corners.
1/2 of the model is clockwise extrusion, note how the defect changes sides. Deceleration seems to be where the issue mostly lies.
More to come with testing.
Getting that bug again to try something different. Sorry this is only one parameter set of a comparison, My normal PA vs Non-Linear Recipr. Not much difference, but some.
I like top down tests vs vertical for some things. Let me see if I can change it up a bit and see what changes what.
Which one looks better to you?
ABS, 43mm3s flow, .3 layer height, .5 line width.
No, I didn't tune these values, I used some values I saw someone else use as a test, and tried them as is. This at least give me a baseline from linear PA.
The positions I am looking at are the decel and accel points of the model. The gaps and the height change from filament stacking too much material in the corners.
1/2 of the model is clockwise extrusion, note how the defect changes sides. Deceleration seems to be where the issue mostly lies.
More to come with testing.
