Junk Part VI: “Primitive” Structures = Junk Science @DarwinsGod
Junk Part VI: “Primitive” Structures = Junk Science  @DarwinsGod
Uploaded May 2021 | Updated September 2026, 42 minutes ago
Why do evolutionists think that fossilized forms are “primitive”? The claim that such forms are “primitive” is not a scientific conclusion; rather, it is junk science.


Links to junk videos:
Junk Part I: The Human Genome Project, youtu.be/zsRIhTBW_dA
Junk Part II: The Great Unravelling, youtu.be/hU6nULERH2o
Junk Part III: Determinism and Evolution Demolished Together, youtu.be/gXl2yQbQ8jw
Junk Part IV: It Gets Worse, youtu.be/A1vFLfdegRw
Junk Part V: Nathan Lents and Junk Science, youtu.be/uOZhD28gmBM


Music: Allpa Kallpa
Junk Part VI: “Primitive” Structures = Junk ScienceJerry Coyne, Determinism, and the SynapseFP6: Histone proteins cannot tolerate much changeFP7: The molecular clock keeps evolutionary time1. Problem of EvilOf Mollusks and MadnessEvolution is a Religious Theory Part 4The Religion of Atheism: Religious RationalismFractal BrainsPlant Intelligence Contradicts EvolutionJerry Coyne and Theological UtilitarianismEvolution Has a Secret
Darwins God |

Junk Part VI: “Primitive” Structures = Junk Science

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER