Jung, Archetypes, and Bad Science @CassEris
Jung, Archetypes, and Bad Science  @CassEris
Uploaded July 2019 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
In this video, we build off of the Freud video to look at another influential psychologist, Carl Jung. We discuss his views on the structure of personality and the mind as well as his approach to therapy. As with Freud, I cover the huge problems with the Jungian view, chiefly the metaphysical dependence and unfalsifiable principles.

This isn't as much of a problem with Jung's theory, but there are still some aspects that assume people only come in two genders, and what the goals of those two genders *should* be. I don't know how much is because of the time Jung was doing his research (i.e,. if he'd embrace gender fluidity and non-binary people but that wasn't acceptable at the time), or if he would have stuck to his theory as is and picked that hill to die on. Regardless, I have tried to describe the theory as is/was, but I do not share/endorse these traditional role/gender assignments.

GIFs sourced from Giphy.
______
Links to stuff
---------
Music: zoeblade.com

https://linktr.ee/casseris

Questions? Comments? Requests?: twitter.com/CassErisYT

Support the channel!
patreon.com/casserisYT
paypal.me/casseris
ko-fi.com/casseris

~Timestamps~
0:00 Jung
6:54 Personality types
10:50 Personality structure
11:58 Personal unconscious
12:52 Complexes
14:50 Collective unconscious
17:26 Archetypes
18:31 Persona
19:35 Shadow
24:25 Animi
26:50 Self
28:17 Wise old people
29:50 Hero
31:53 Development of personality
35:50Jungian therapy
43:26 Case studies
50:51 Criticisms
57:07 To skip falsifiable
1:01:40 Conclusions
Jung, Archetypes, and Bad ScienceHow to write a psychology paper! Examples from intro psych, perception, and cognitiveGuided Imagery for Pain (Doesnt Help Me)
Cass Eris |

Jung, Archetypes, and Bad Science

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER