Uploaded July 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Onora O’Neill made a powerful contribution to the Leveson Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the UK press. Sir Brian Leveson was clearly persuaded by O’Neill’s account of press freedom as a communication right which must meet the needs of the public. The post-Leveson framework for press regulation is designed to meet the public’s need for accurate news reporting. However, this framework has met fierce opposition from the news industry, in which press freedom is understood to mean an absolute freedom from regulatory restraint. Can, and should, we reconcile O’Neill’s ethics of positive liberty with the news industry’s culture of negative liberty?
This lecture was held at the 2017 Holberg Symposium: "Ethics for Communication" in honour of Holberg Laureate Onora O'Neill.
BIOGRAPHY: Jonathan Heawood is the CEO of IMPRESS: The Independent Monitor for the Press. He has previously worked as a journalist and human rights campaigner and has written on free speech and regulation for publications, including The Encyclopedia of Twentieth-Century Fiction, Critical Quarterly, Journal of Media Law, Ethical Space and Communications Law.
Onora O’Neill made a powerful contribution to the Leveson Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the UK press. Sir Brian Leveson was clearly persuaded by O’Neill’s account of press freedom as a communication right which must meet the needs of the public. The post-Leveson framework for press regulation is designed to meet the public’s need for accurate news reporting. However, this framework has met fierce opposition from the news industry, in which press freedom is understood to mean an absolute freedom from regulatory restraint. Can, and should, we reconcile O’Neill’s ethics of positive liberty with the news industry’s culture of negative liberty?
This lecture was held at the 2017 Holberg Symposium: "Ethics for Communication" in honour of Holberg Laureate Onora O'Neill.
BIOGRAPHY: Jonathan Heawood is the CEO of IMPRESS: The Independent Monitor for the Press. He has previously worked as a journalist and human rights campaigner and has written on free speech and regulation for publications, including The Encyclopedia of Twentieth-Century Fiction, Critical Quarterly, Journal of Media Law, Ethical Space and Communications Law.


![Holberg Memorial Prize 2013: Bruno Latour
From the award ceremony of the Holberg Memorial Prize 2013. Introduction by Sigmund Grønmo, rector at University of Bergen and chair of Holberg Memorial Fund. Acceptance Speech by Bruno Latour.
Holberg International Memorial Prize is awarded annually for outstanding scholarly work in the fields of the arts and humanities, social sciences, law and theology. The prize amount is NOK 4.5 million (Appr. EUR 610,000/ USD 790,000)
From the citation of the Holberg Prize Academic Committee:
Bruno Latour has undertaken an ambitious analysis and reinterpretation of modernity, challenging the most fundamental categories such as the distinction between modern and pre-modern, nature and society, human and non-human.
He has completely re-imagined Science Studies, pioneering new ethnographic methods and introducing new concepts and possibilities of communication to engage in collective research projects. He combines empirical methods and observation with the unsettling of concepts, reconfiguring the organization of knowledge and inviting participation. His influence has been felt internationally and well beyond the social study of science, in history, art history, philosophy, anthropology, geography, theology, literature and legal studies [...] More information: http://www.holbergprisen.no/en/bruno-latour Holberg Memorial Prize 2013: Bruno Latour](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mAsrwHKdQc8/mqdefault.jpg)







