Uploaded June 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Links Mentioned in this Episode:
- bartehrman.com/visions - Visions of the End - How early Jews and Christians imagined the end of the age - is our new course with Dr. Jason Staples starting on August 13th. Early-bird pricing until August 1st via this link.
*Episode Outline:*
0:00 How scribes changed the Gospel of John
0:50 Bart on why textual variants first drew him into scholarship
2:03 The oldest manuscripts of John and the discovery of P52
4:32 Other ways scholars reconstruct John: translations and church fathers
7:25 John 1:18 — did the text originally say “the unique Son” or “the unique God”?
14:43 John 19:5 and 7:46 — tiny changes that affect whether Jesus sounds fully human or more than human
24:27 John 14:9 — scribes adjusting the text to avoid confusing Jesus with the Father
27:17 The woman taken in adultery — why the most famous story in John was probably added later
31:17 What counts as Scripture if a passage was not originally in the Gospel?
36:34 Bart’s Soapbox: why “97% certainty” claims about the New Testament are misleading
42:20 Final summary: why textual variants in John really matter
*Episode Description*
The words of the Bible are considered sacred by millions, believed by many to be the divinely inspired Word of God. But what if those very words were changed over centuries of copying? In this eye-opening episode of "Misquoting Jesus," Dr. Bart Ehrman takes us on a fascinating detective story into the textual history of the Gospel of John, revealing that our modern Bibles contain changes—some small, some massive—that were introduced by ancient scribes.
For Dr. Ehrman, the study of these textual variants wasn't a crisis of faith but the beginning of an exciting scholarly journey. He explains how, as a young Christian who believed in the inerrancy of Scripture, the challenge of sorting through different manuscript readings to uncover the original text was a thrilling pursuit. This discipline, known as textual criticism, is the oldest field of modern biblical studies, yet for a long time, it was a niche interest. Today, it has exploded, as scholars recognize that understanding these changes is crucial to understanding the development of early Christian thought.
The conversation begins by examining the manuscript evidence for John. Our earliest witness is a tiny, credit-card-sized fragment known as P52 (Papyrus 52), dated to the early 2nd century—possibly just 30-40 years after the Gospel was written. While an incredible find, it contains only a few words from Jesus’ trial before Pilate. Our first complete manuscripts of John don't appear until around 375 CE, leaving a 300-year gap during which countless changes could have been, and were, introduced.
Dr. Ehrman explains how scholars reconstruct the text not only from Greek manuscripts but also from ancient translations (like Latin, Syriac, and Coptic) and quotations from early church fathers like Origen of Alexandria. These sources reveal a fluid textual tradition where scribes, driven by their own theological convictions, altered the text to clarify, defend, or enhance their understanding of Jesus.
The episode delves into several specific, theologically charged alterations including John 1:18, where a one-letter difference in Greek changes the reading from the “unique Son” to the “unique God,” with major implications for Jesus’s identity, and John 19:5, where “Behold the man” may originally have read “Behold a man,” presenting Jesus as a mere mortal in Pilate’s eyes.
*Three Key Takeaways:*
1. *Scribal Changes Were Often Theologically Motivated:* Ancient scribes were not merely passive copyists. They were active participants in the great theological debates of their time.
2. *Even Tiny Changes Can Have Massive Implications:* Tiny textual changes, even a single letter or word, can dramatically affect the meaning of a biblical passage. Examples from John show why textual criticism matters for understanding what the biblical authors actually wrote and meant.
3. *One of the Most Famous Stories About Jesus Was Not Originally in the Bible:* The famous story of the woman taken in adultery was likely not part of the original Gospel of John. Its later addition raises important questions about how Christians define Scripture, canon, and tradition.
*Also watch these episodes:*
Missing Manuscripts: Uncovering the Original Gospels
youtube.com/watch?v=uObu6PCipG0
How did Scribes Change the Gospel of Mark?
youtube.com/watch?v=mDX_EXb5pT8
Why the Doctrine of Inerrancy Contradicts the Manuscript Evidence
youtu.be/C2MUeKNpds8?si=NS1jGfqRxX7vkokI
#GospelOfJohn
#TextualCriticism
#BibleManuscripts
#NewTestament
#BiblicalScholarship
Links Mentioned in this Episode:
- bartehrman.com/visions - Visions of the End - How early Jews and Christians imagined the end of the age - is our new course with Dr. Jason Staples starting on August 13th. Early-bird pricing until August 1st via this link.
*Episode Outline:*
0:00 How scribes changed the Gospel of John
0:50 Bart on why textual variants first drew him into scholarship
2:03 The oldest manuscripts of John and the discovery of P52
4:32 Other ways scholars reconstruct John: translations and church fathers
7:25 John 1:18 — did the text originally say “the unique Son” or “the unique God”?
14:43 John 19:5 and 7:46 — tiny changes that affect whether Jesus sounds fully human or more than human
24:27 John 14:9 — scribes adjusting the text to avoid confusing Jesus with the Father
27:17 The woman taken in adultery — why the most famous story in John was probably added later
31:17 What counts as Scripture if a passage was not originally in the Gospel?
36:34 Bart’s Soapbox: why “97% certainty” claims about the New Testament are misleading
42:20 Final summary: why textual variants in John really matter
*Episode Description*
The words of the Bible are considered sacred by millions, believed by many to be the divinely inspired Word of God. But what if those very words were changed over centuries of copying? In this eye-opening episode of "Misquoting Jesus," Dr. Bart Ehrman takes us on a fascinating detective story into the textual history of the Gospel of John, revealing that our modern Bibles contain changes—some small, some massive—that were introduced by ancient scribes.
For Dr. Ehrman, the study of these textual variants wasn't a crisis of faith but the beginning of an exciting scholarly journey. He explains how, as a young Christian who believed in the inerrancy of Scripture, the challenge of sorting through different manuscript readings to uncover the original text was a thrilling pursuit. This discipline, known as textual criticism, is the oldest field of modern biblical studies, yet for a long time, it was a niche interest. Today, it has exploded, as scholars recognize that understanding these changes is crucial to understanding the development of early Christian thought.
The conversation begins by examining the manuscript evidence for John. Our earliest witness is a tiny, credit-card-sized fragment known as P52 (Papyrus 52), dated to the early 2nd century—possibly just 30-40 years after the Gospel was written. While an incredible find, it contains only a few words from Jesus’ trial before Pilate. Our first complete manuscripts of John don't appear until around 375 CE, leaving a 300-year gap during which countless changes could have been, and were, introduced.
Dr. Ehrman explains how scholars reconstruct the text not only from Greek manuscripts but also from ancient translations (like Latin, Syriac, and Coptic) and quotations from early church fathers like Origen of Alexandria. These sources reveal a fluid textual tradition where scribes, driven by their own theological convictions, altered the text to clarify, defend, or enhance their understanding of Jesus.
The episode delves into several specific, theologically charged alterations including John 1:18, where a one-letter difference in Greek changes the reading from the “unique Son” to the “unique God,” with major implications for Jesus’s identity, and John 19:5, where “Behold the man” may originally have read “Behold a man,” presenting Jesus as a mere mortal in Pilate’s eyes.
*Three Key Takeaways:*
1. *Scribal Changes Were Often Theologically Motivated:* Ancient scribes were not merely passive copyists. They were active participants in the great theological debates of their time.
2. *Even Tiny Changes Can Have Massive Implications:* Tiny textual changes, even a single letter or word, can dramatically affect the meaning of a biblical passage. Examples from John show why textual criticism matters for understanding what the biblical authors actually wrote and meant.
3. *One of the Most Famous Stories About Jesus Was Not Originally in the Bible:* The famous story of the woman taken in adultery was likely not part of the original Gospel of John. Its later addition raises important questions about how Christians define Scripture, canon, and tradition.
*Also watch these episodes:*
Missing Manuscripts: Uncovering the Original Gospels
youtube.com/watch?v=uObu6PCipG0
How did Scribes Change the Gospel of Mark?
youtube.com/watch?v=mDX_EXb5pT8
Why the Doctrine of Inerrancy Contradicts the Manuscript Evidence
youtu.be/C2MUeKNpds8?si=NS1jGfqRxX7vkokI
#GospelOfJohn
#TextualCriticism
#BibleManuscripts
#NewTestament
#BiblicalScholarship
