John Maunsell: Comparing Monkeys and Mice as Behavioral Models for Humans @SacklerColloquia
John Maunsell: Comparing Monkeys and Mice as Behavioral Models for Humans  @SacklerColloquia
Uploaded January 2019 | Updated September 2026, 12 hours ago
This talk was presented during the National Academy of Sciences Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium: Using Monkey Models to Understand and Develop Treatments for Human Brain Disorders in Irvine, CA January 7-8, 2019.

Organized by Bob Wurtz (National Institutes of Health), Beth Buffalo (University of Washington), Tony Movshon (New York University)

Session 1: BRAINS AND BEHAVIOR: HUMANS, MONKEYS AND MICE
Comparing monkeys and mice as behavioral models for humans, John Maunsell, University of Chicago

In recent decades, mice have become the dominant animal model for studying the basis of human physiology and disease because they are genetically tractable and have bodily functions broadly similar to ours. But in the specific study of higher brain functions and brain disorders, the differences between mice and humans are great, and monkeys provide the best practical model for the human brain. However, the principles which would rationally lead an investigator to choose a monkey model over a mouse are nowhere clearly articulated.

This two-day colloquium considers a core set of functions for which monkey models are critical. The colloquium begins by comparing human and monkey brains and behavior, and then frames the conversation with a comparison between monkey and mouse. Successive sessions then consider domains in which monkey models have proved valuable: disorders of development, aging, and mood, and restoration of sensory and motor functions.

A collection of articles based on these presentations will appear in a special issue of PNAS, to provide a resource for those wishing to learn about the contribution of monkey research to understanding the human brain and its disorders.
John Maunsell: Comparing Monkeys and Mice as Behavioral Models for HumansVisualization as Lingua Franca in Machine Learning - Fernanda Viegas02 Kathleen SegersonModeling New Knowledges – An Inclusive STEAM + D Imperative - Sara DiamondCritical Perspective: Strengths and fallacies in the dominant DL narrativeMary Power: Synthetic threads through the web of lifeNati Srebro - Theoretical Perspectives on Deep LearningDebra Mathews: CRISPR and the meaning of solidarity in a Balkanized world
NAS Colloquia |

John Maunsell: Comparing Monkeys and Mice as Behavioral Models for Humans

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER