Uploaded October 2023 | Updated September 2026, 5 days ago
Lady Cee and JT are back to unpack a major announcement from the Jehovah's Witness Headquarters! 🚨 "Are Jehovah's Witnesses Cancelling their Door-to-Door Proselytizing for the Rank & File?" 🚪🛑
For countless years, knocking on doors and sharing the message has been at the heart of the Jehovah's Witnesses' outreach. But now, a significant change in reporting practices suggests a potential shift in how the rank & file engage in proselytizing. Could this be a hint at a more substantial transformation within the organization? Or is it just a modern adaptation to the changing times?
Join us as we dive deep into the implications and motivations behind this move, explore how it may impact the perception of Jehovah's Witnesses, and discuss the broader landscape of faith outreach in today's world. 🌍💬
Your insights and perspectives are valued! Be part of this enlightening conversation, and together, let's uncover the layers behind this development. 🧐🔍
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: streamyard.com/pal/d/4781897218785280
Previous videos produced by EXJW Critical Thinker on the topic of counting time:
Part 1 - Counting Time - Why Are Jehovah's Witnesses Always on the Clock?
youtu.be/vd-AMiyfkJ0
Part 2 - Counting Time - Why Are Jehovah's Witnesses Required to Turn in Timesheets?
youtu.be/3W4GLwP8FVE
Part 3 - Counting Time - Required to Turn in Timesheets
youtu.be/-9E8LhnfgUg
Part 4 – Counting Time - Jehovah's Witnesses and the Publisher Record Card
youtu.be/K4sx3wT08a4
Lady Cee and JT are back to unpack a major announcement from the Jehovah's Witness Headquarters! 🚨 "Are Jehovah's Witnesses Cancelling their Door-to-Door Proselytizing for the Rank & File?" 🚪🛑
For countless years, knocking on doors and sharing the message has been at the heart of the Jehovah's Witnesses' outreach. But now, a significant change in reporting practices suggests a potential shift in how the rank & file engage in proselytizing. Could this be a hint at a more substantial transformation within the organization? Or is it just a modern adaptation to the changing times?
Join us as we dive deep into the implications and motivations behind this move, explore how it may impact the perception of Jehovah's Witnesses, and discuss the broader landscape of faith outreach in today's world. 🌍💬
Your insights and perspectives are valued! Be part of this enlightening conversation, and together, let's uncover the layers behind this development. 🧐🔍
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: streamyard.com/pal/d/4781897218785280
Previous videos produced by EXJW Critical Thinker on the topic of counting time:
Part 1 - Counting Time - Why Are Jehovah's Witnesses Always on the Clock?
youtu.be/vd-AMiyfkJ0
Part 2 - Counting Time - Why Are Jehovah's Witnesses Required to Turn in Timesheets?
youtu.be/3W4GLwP8FVE
Part 3 - Counting Time - Required to Turn in Timesheets
youtu.be/-9E8LhnfgUg
Part 4 – Counting Time - Jehovah's Witnesses and the Publisher Record Card
youtu.be/K4sx3wT08a4


![Belgian Court Fines Jehovahs Witnesses for Shunning
#exjwsthink #jehovah #jehovahswitness #exjw
Do Jehovahs Witnesses have a policy for shunning former members? The Watchtower lawyers present arguments to the Belgian court system that it is an individual choice whether to shun family. However, this podcast provides excellent proof from their own written publications that they have a system of teaching their adherents to shun former members. In fact, the Watchtower, Bible & Tract Society has a long history of influencing its members to comply with their teachings even at the cost of dividing families and long-time friendships.
https://foref-europe.org/blog/2021/03/19/belgium-the-decision-of-the-court-of-ghent-against-jehovahs-witnesses/
The following links pertain to written comments by Dr. Introvigne, a defender of JWs who disagrees with the Belgium court:
PART ONE
https://bitterwinter.org/jehovahs-witnesses-fined-in-ghent-for-their-ostracism-a-wrong-decision/
PART TWO
https://bitterwinter.org/the-ghent-jehovahs-witnesses-decision-dangers-for-religious-liberty/
PART THREE
https://bitterwinter.org/the-ghent-jehovahs-witness-decision-dangerous-for-all-religions/
The Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Case
On 16 February, a trial started against the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (CCJW) at the criminal court of Ghent (East Flanders) on the alleged grounds of discrimination and incitement to hatred with a particular focus on their shunning (ostracization) practice in cases of disfellowshipping (exclusion) and disassociation (voluntary resignation).
A former Jehovah’s Witness who had voluntarily left the movement in 2011, filed a criminal complaint against the CCJW in 2015, and managed to have it supported by over a dozen more former Jehovah’s Witnesses.
According to the internal religious practice of Jehovah’s Witnesses, when the elders of a local congregation exclude a member or are notified about a voluntary resignation, they make a short neutral public announcement which states: “[Name of person] is no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses”. The CCJW is not involved in the making of that neutral announcement but is notified about the decision.
In their conclusions provided to the Court before the trial, they said that they do not segregate excluded or resigning members as these can always attend their religious services. They also point out that baptized Jehovah’s Witnesses who no longer actively associate with fellow believers, are not shunned.
Clarifying the relations between Jehovah’s Witnesses and disfellowshipped or disassociated family members, they say: “In the immediate household, although the ‘religious ties’ the expelled or disassociated person had with his family change, … blood ties remain. The marriage relationship and normal family affections and dealings continue.” In other words, normal family affection and association continues.
In addition, the CCJW had provided the Court with nine statements of individuals who had been excluded and who had since been reinstated as Jehovah’s Witnesses. In their testimonies, they explained how they had been fairly treated by congregation elders, family, and others in the congregation when they were excluded.
The social distancing doctrine stated and practiced by Jehovah’s Witnesses in Belgium and all other countries was fixed by their Central College in the United States on the basis of their interpretation of the Bible.
The CCJW considers it is not legally responsible for the intra-familial relations between its members and former members, as it is an individual choice.
Conclusion
Are we on the way to put in the dock the Bible, the interpretation and the implementation of its doctrines fixed by the highest religious authorities and powers in the name of interpretations and implementation of human rights fixed by national judicial powers? If so, this would be a pandora box that would affect other religions and other holy scriptures.
★ VISIT OUR WEBSITE
http://www.exjwcriticalthinker.com
★SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL
http://bit.ly/2p9RTSC
★ TWEET US! #ExJWsThink
https://twitter.com/ExJWsThink
★ VISIT OUR WORDPRESS BLOG
https://exjehovahswitnessct.wordpress.com
★ FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
https://www.instagram.com/exjwcriticalthinker/
★LIKE US ON FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/Ex-Jehovahs-Witnesses-Critical-Thinkers-529293183758131/
✰✰ EMAIL: jtladycee@gmail.com Belgian Court Fines Jehovahs Witnesses for Shunning](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gIXdxuxzZ3s/mqdefault.jpg)







