Steve Patterson | Is the World Blurry? | The Modernist Fallacy @StevePatterson | Uploaded May 2017 | Updated October 2024, 18 hours ago.
What's more likely: a precise description of an ambiguous world, or an ambiguous description of a precise world?
This is the modernist fallacy: to think that conceptual blurriness correctly describes a blurry world.
To me, this is silly and irrational. Ambiguous theories are flawed; they aren't positive arguments for "true ambiguity"
To more deeply understand why paradoxes don't exist in the world, read my short book on the topic: amazon.com/dp/B01M9JL27L/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=sl1&tag=stevepatte-20&linkId=84e1ef535102b96acf62739f284b0519
Check out more at: steve-patterson.com
If you think this content is worth $1, please check out my Patreon page to support the creation of more videos like this:
patreon.com/stevepatterson
Or you can enter Amazon through: goo.gl/ftfFLg
Or, you can support with Bitcoin Cash: qp35pt4qlgskgg05zjuuy84udnnhw4ma7vrn05qjfz
What's more likely: a precise description of an ambiguous world, or an ambiguous description of a precise world?
This is the modernist fallacy: to think that conceptual blurriness correctly describes a blurry world.
To me, this is silly and irrational. Ambiguous theories are flawed; they aren't positive arguments for "true ambiguity"
To more deeply understand why paradoxes don't exist in the world, read my short book on the topic: amazon.com/dp/B01M9JL27L/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=sl1&tag=stevepatte-20&linkId=84e1ef535102b96acf62739f284b0519
Check out more at: steve-patterson.com
If you think this content is worth $1, please check out my Patreon page to support the creation of more videos like this:
patreon.com/stevepatterson
Or you can enter Amazon through: goo.gl/ftfFLg
Or, you can support with Bitcoin Cash: qp35pt4qlgskgg05zjuuy84udnnhw4ma7vrn05qjfz
