Uploaded October 2010 | Updated September 2026, 46 minutes ago
Part 1 of a 5-part talk. Presented by Prof. Christopher Davis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland.
Despite an overwhelming preponderance of evidence to the contrary, there continues to be some public concern that human exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation from cell phones and base stations, even at relatively low levels, can constitute a health hazard. The media seize on any report of a possible health risk based on occasional reports of biological effects being produced by RF radiation, but ignore the much larger number of studies that find nothing. This talk will review the science underlying our understanding of how RF radiation can interact with biological systems and discuss why public concern about the health risk from cell phones and base stations is irrational. The claimed connection between cell phone use and cancer will be examined, and some of the legal cases that have kept the cell phone health controversy alive. A specific interaction mechanism that will be discussed is the possibility of nonlinearity in cells and tissue that might demodulate an RF carrier.
Christopher C. Davis is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. He received the B.A. degree (with Honors) in Natural Sciences from the University of Cambridge in 1965, the M.A. degree from the University of Cambridge in 1970, and the Ph.D. degree in Physics from the University of Manchester in 1970. He has served as a scientific consultant to several US Government agencies and industry. He is a member of the IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee SCC-34 SC2, which deals with RF exposure from wireless devices.
Views expressed are those of the speaker and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Capital Area Skeptics (NCAS).
Part 1 of a 5-part talk. Presented by Prof. Christopher Davis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland.
Despite an overwhelming preponderance of evidence to the contrary, there continues to be some public concern that human exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation from cell phones and base stations, even at relatively low levels, can constitute a health hazard. The media seize on any report of a possible health risk based on occasional reports of biological effects being produced by RF radiation, but ignore the much larger number of studies that find nothing. This talk will review the science underlying our understanding of how RF radiation can interact with biological systems and discuss why public concern about the health risk from cell phones and base stations is irrational. The claimed connection between cell phone use and cancer will be examined, and some of the legal cases that have kept the cell phone health controversy alive. A specific interaction mechanism that will be discussed is the possibility of nonlinearity in cells and tissue that might demodulate an RF carrier.
Christopher C. Davis is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. He received the B.A. degree (with Honors) in Natural Sciences from the University of Cambridge in 1965, the M.A. degree from the University of Cambridge in 1970, and the Ph.D. degree in Physics from the University of Manchester in 1970. He has served as a scientific consultant to several US Government agencies and industry. He is a member of the IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee SCC-34 SC2, which deals with RF exposure from wireless devices.
Views expressed are those of the speaker and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Capital Area Skeptics (NCAS).

![The Latest Evidence for the Apollo Landings (Marty McGuire)
A 2021 poll* of US adults asked, “In your opinion, how likely is it that the following [scenario is] true? The 1969 landing on the moon didn’t occur and was actually staged somewhere in Arizona.”
The results showed that 27% answered with “not sure,” “probably true,” or “definitely true!”
This poll isn’t an outlier. It’s consistent with another poll** taken that year, showing 29% with similar responses!
Especially concerning is that these beliefs are more prevalent among younger generations, those born after 1980.
We skeptics have seen this situation play out again and again an evidence-based rational claim is rejected by a sizable portion of the public, which instead supports an apparently absurd alternative explanation for the evidence. What can we do?
Our next speaker has stepped up to the challenge. On his own initiative, Marty McGuire (the “Backyard Astronomy Guy” of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania) examined the publicly available online science data compiled by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO). ISRO’s Chandrayaan-2 spacecraft has surveyed the Moon’s surface from orbit for several years. In April 2021, it flew especially close to the Apollo 11 and 12 landing sites, obtaining the best images of those historic sites since 1969.
Mr. McGuire will demonstrate how he was able to (as anyone who wants to have a look for themselves can) obtain the raw images from ISRO and process them. He’s shared the instructions and images across social media for the benefit of any other “do it yourself” researchers. He and NCAS President Scott Snell (an engineer for NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) will discuss this and other evidence of the Apollo landings.
Mr. McGuire, a marketing director for a community bank by day, is also a “NASA Solar System Ambassador” volunteer, communicating the science and excitement of NASAs space exploration missions and discoveries with people in his community. By night he is an amateur astronomer, known online as the “Backyard Astronomy Guy.”
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Capital Area Skeptics (NCAS).
* The Economist/YouGov Poll, “Belief in Conspiracy Theories,” https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/w2zmwpzsq0/econTabReport.pdf
** University of New Hampshire, Carsey School of Public Policy, “Conspiracy vs. Science: A Survey of U.S. Public Beliefs,” https://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/448/
#Apollo11
#Apollo12
#MoonLanding
#MoonLandings
#LunarSurface
#NASA
#ISRO
#Chandrayaan2
#SpaceExploration
#SpaceHistory
#LunarModule
#Surveyor
#MoonHoax
#Debunking
#CriticalThinking
#Skepticism
#ScienceEducation
#STEM
#Astronomy
#BackyardAstronomy
#LunarReconnaissance
#SpaceDebunked
#SpaceHeritage
#SpaceTourism
#PublicOutreach The Latest Evidence for the Apollo Landings (Marty McGuire)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xcNV2uQiUrA/mqdefault.jpg)


