@CreationMyths
  @CreationMyths
Creation Myths | Intelligent Design Proponent: No Known Function for Most of Human Genome @CreationMyths | Uploaded May 2024 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
On May 2nd, 2024, I had a very enjoyable debate with Dr. Casey Luskin of Discovery Institute on the topic of junk DNA in the human genome. Like most (I think all) ID creationists, Dr. Luskin argues that the human genome is mostly functional, and "junk DNA" is an outdated concept that's falling by the wayside, and this is supported by the weight of current data.

But at the end of our conversation, he said...not that. Take a look.

This is just a hobby for me, but if you appreciate what I'm doing and want to say thank you, you can contribute here:
patreon.com/creationmyths
paypal.me/creationmyths?locale.x=en_US

And if you want early access to pre-recorded videos, you can become a channel member: youtube.com/channel/UCZmhEtG-QIrmyWoW0M6TIgQ/join

If you disagree with anything in this video and want an opportunity to make your case, email me: creationmythschannel@gmail.com. I'll give you as much time as you want, and then I'll take the time I want to respond, and we can have a conversation.
Intelligent Design Proponent: No Known Function for Most of Human GenomeCOVID Update (its fine)Responding to Critics: SFT and RawMatt Misunderstand Mutation RatesHuman Chromosome 2 Fusion with Studio 215 Official and Standing for TruthCreationism is a Conspiracy Theory! With @GutsickGibbon, @ScienceSideUp, & @criticalbasedtheoryGenetic Entropy Debate Review: Mr. Anderson v. Standing for Truth, w/Dr. Zach Hancock & Mr. Anderson

Intelligent Design Proponent: No Known Function for Most of Human Genome @CreationMyths

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER