I could remove ALL RxJS in my Angular app, but should I? @JoshuaMorony
I could remove ALL RxJS in my Angular app, but should I?  @JoshuaMorony
Uploaded November 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
My Angular course: angularstart.com

The new "resource" API and the "linkedSignal" primitive can do a surprising amount of the heavy lifting I would typically do with RxJS. In this scenario, I could remove all of the existing RxJS and do everything entirely with signals, but is that a good idea?

The original RxJS/Signals state management video: youtube.com/watch?v=R4Ff2bPiWh4

Get weekly content and tips exclusive to my newsletter: https://mobirony.ck.page/4a331b9076

My game dev channel: youtube.com/@joshmoronypixels

MY GEAR:
Keyboard: https://adm42.dev/?ref=3
Neovim setup: github.com/joshuamorony/lazyvim
Animations: motioncanvas.io

0:00 RxJS/Signals state management
1:30 The resource API
2:30 Handling actions with signals
5:07 The role of linkedSignal

#angular #rxjs #signals

- More tutorials: modernangular.com
I could remove ALL RxJS in my Angular app, but should I?Why XState and RxJS are not too complexEvery uncommon TypeScript concept that is useful to meWhy Im still using RxJS (not signals) for host binding in AngularHow I code PRODUCTIVELY on my phone (with Neovim)The simple way I paywalled an Angular/Astro SSG siteWhat a professional Angular project looks likeWhy does the average app kind of suck?How I code in Angular when nobody is watchingThe problem with going full declarative in AngularNo more Angular videos?I spent YEARS optimising my workflow for coding
Joshua Morony |

I could remove ALL RxJS in my Angular app, but should I?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER