Veritasium | How Was Video Invented? @veritasium | Uploaded 5 years ago | Updated 10 hours ago
I always wanted to know why film looked better than video. Moving electronic images have as long a history but were invented for a different purpose. This video was sponsored by B&H Photo: bhphotovideo.com
Huge thanks to:
Richard Diehl, Video Labguy youtube.com/user/videolabguy
labguysworld.com
Branch Education for awesome animations
ve42.co/BranchEd
Minutephysics for mechanical TV animations
youtube.com/minutephysics
Mark Schubin
Engineer and explainer, SMPTE Life Fellow
smpte.org
This is a video I've long wanted to make, about what makes video look like video and, up until 10 years ago or so, not as appealing as film. I grew up with the two technologies (film and video) in parallel and to me they always seemed like two ways of achieving the same ends: recording and replaying moving images. But their histories are quite distinct. Film was always a way to capture moving images for later replaying. Video started out as a way to transfer images from one place to another instantaneously. This dates back to the first fax machine, mechanical TV, live broadcast tv and ultimately videotapes. This history focuses on the early decades of video and not the more recent switches to chip cameras and solid state storage. Maybe that's a story for another day.
Additional resources and references:
The Dawn of Tape: Transmission Device as Preservation Medium
ve42.co/dawnoftape
What Sparked Video Research in 1877? The Overlooked Role of the Siemens Artificial Eye
ve42.co/sparkvideo
Video Preservation Website:
http://videopreservation.conservation-us.org
Image Orthicon Tube:
http://interiorcommunicationselectrician.tpub.com/14120/141200335.htm
Film vs Digital
stephenfollows.com/film-vs-digital
Eyes of a Generation:
http://eyesofageneration.com
Television in the US:
http://www3.northern.edu/wild/th100/tv.htm
http://www.classictvinfo.com
Music from epidemicsound.com "Seaweed" "Capture a Picture 1" "Colorful Animation 4"
I always wanted to know why film looked better than video. Moving electronic images have as long a history but were invented for a different purpose. This video was sponsored by B&H Photo: bhphotovideo.com
Huge thanks to:
Richard Diehl, Video Labguy youtube.com/user/videolabguy
labguysworld.com
Branch Education for awesome animations
ve42.co/BranchEd
Minutephysics for mechanical TV animations
youtube.com/minutephysics
Mark Schubin
Engineer and explainer, SMPTE Life Fellow
smpte.org
This is a video I've long wanted to make, about what makes video look like video and, up until 10 years ago or so, not as appealing as film. I grew up with the two technologies (film and video) in parallel and to me they always seemed like two ways of achieving the same ends: recording and replaying moving images. But their histories are quite distinct. Film was always a way to capture moving images for later replaying. Video started out as a way to transfer images from one place to another instantaneously. This dates back to the first fax machine, mechanical TV, live broadcast tv and ultimately videotapes. This history focuses on the early decades of video and not the more recent switches to chip cameras and solid state storage. Maybe that's a story for another day.
Additional resources and references:
The Dawn of Tape: Transmission Device as Preservation Medium
ve42.co/dawnoftape
What Sparked Video Research in 1877? The Overlooked Role of the Siemens Artificial Eye
ve42.co/sparkvideo
Video Preservation Website:
http://videopreservation.conservation-us.org
Image Orthicon Tube:
http://interiorcommunicationselectrician.tpub.com/14120/141200335.htm
Film vs Digital
stephenfollows.com/film-vs-digital
Eyes of a Generation:
http://eyesofageneration.com
Television in the US:
http://www3.northern.edu/wild/th100/tv.htm
http://www.classictvinfo.com
Music from epidemicsound.com "Seaweed" "Capture a Picture 1" "Colorful Animation 4"
