Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 5 hours ago
How many UAVs have you counted at the scene of the crime?
Just one? Two?
How many UAVs would we need to find at the murder scene, to introduce reasonable doubt, and get Tyler Robinson exonerated?
Four? Five? No less than nine?
If there were 173 UAVs flying around, would that "be a thing?" and get Candace's attention?
So, because it's not quite 173 units, no one cares?
What if there were 95 UAV units, flying around?
What if there were only 5?
So, more than ten is a problem, but less than ten, we ignore?
How many UAVs did you count, at the scene, so far?
How many would we need to find, to exonerate Tyler Robinson?
This analysis is not really news. This video is an independent opinion journalism project and represents my opinion, and my opinion only, so, it really shouldn't matter much.
THIS VIDEO MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.
SUCH MATERIAL IS MADE AVAILABLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
THIS CONSTITUTES A 'FAIR USE' OF ANY SUCH MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR PURSUANT TO TITLE 17 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 106A-117 REGARDING USE OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL.
FURTHER, ONLY SMALL PORTIONS OF EACH LISTED CREDIT ARE USED. THIS CREATOR THANKS EACH PERSONALLY IN ADVANCE.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This effort here is respectfully submitted and credit is listed below. Only small portions of each listed has been used and/or we have requested permission to use in advance. Upon request verification can be submitted.
(We could be wrong...)
How many UAVs have you counted at the scene of the crime?
Just one? Two?
How many UAVs would we need to find at the murder scene, to introduce reasonable doubt, and get Tyler Robinson exonerated?
Four? Five? No less than nine?
If there were 173 UAVs flying around, would that "be a thing?" and get Candace's attention?
So, because it's not quite 173 units, no one cares?
What if there were 95 UAV units, flying around?
What if there were only 5?
So, more than ten is a problem, but less than ten, we ignore?
How many UAVs did you count, at the scene, so far?
How many would we need to find, to exonerate Tyler Robinson?
This analysis is not really news. This video is an independent opinion journalism project and represents my opinion, and my opinion only, so, it really shouldn't matter much.
THIS VIDEO MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.
SUCH MATERIAL IS MADE AVAILABLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
THIS CONSTITUTES A 'FAIR USE' OF ANY SUCH MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR PURSUANT TO TITLE 17 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 106A-117 REGARDING USE OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL.
FURTHER, ONLY SMALL PORTIONS OF EACH LISTED CREDIT ARE USED. THIS CREATOR THANKS EACH PERSONALLY IN ADVANCE.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This effort here is respectfully submitted and credit is listed below. Only small portions of each listed has been used and/or we have requested permission to use in advance. Upon request verification can be submitted.
(We could be wrong...)
![John Cullen Investigates: The Battle of the Animals, w/ host, Jason Goodman
This analysis is not news.
This is satire.
We make fun of stuff.
We make fun of people, and tell jokes, but most of our jokes arent very good.
Is that illegal, to be a bad comedian?
If so, [you know who] would have been locked up a long time ago...
This video is an independent opinion journalism project and represents our opinion, and our opinion only.
THIS VIDEO MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.
SUCH MATERIAL IS MADE AVAILABLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
THIS CONSTITUTES A FAIR USE OF ANY SUCH MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR PURSUANT TO TITLE 17 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 106A-117 REGARDING USE OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL.
FURTHER, ONLY SMALL PORTIONS OF EACH LISTED CREDIT ARE USED. THIS CREATOR THANKS EACH PERSONALLY IN ADVANCE.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This effort here is respectfully submitted and credit is listed below. Only small portions of each listed has been used and/or we have requested permission to use in advance. Upon request verification can be submitted.
(We could be wrong...) John Cullen Investigates: The Battle of the Animals, w/ host, Jason Goodman](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/78MNpvssOZE/mqdefault.jpg)


![Webb of Deception Episode 11: The Quinn Michaels Connection
This analysis is not news.
This is satire.
We make fun of stuff.
We make fun of people, and tell jokes, but most of our jokes arent very good.
Is that illegal, to be a bad comedian?
If so, [you know who] would have been locked up a long time ago...
This video is an independent opinion journalism project and represents our opinion, and our opinion only.
THIS VIDEO MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.
SUCH MATERIAL IS MADE AVAILABLE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
THIS CONSTITUTES A FAIR USE OF ANY SUCH MATERIAL AS PROVIDED FOR PURSUANT TO TITLE 17 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 106A-117 REGARDING USE OF COPYRIGHT MATERIAL.
FURTHER, ONLY SMALL PORTIONS OF EACH LISTED CREDIT ARE USED. THIS CREATOR THANKS EACH PERSONALLY IN ADVANCE.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This effort here is respectfully submitted and credit is listed below. Only small portions of each listed has been used and/or we have requested permission to use in advance. Upon request verification can be submitted.
(We could be wrong...) Webb of Deception Episode 11: The Quinn Michaels Connection](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8aFYWwohv20/mqdefault.jpg)






