TheNewAmericanMedia | How Many Trump Shooters? Is There A Crowdstrike/Ukraine Connection? The Agree To Disagree Show @TheNewAmericanMedia | Uploaded July 2024 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
On today's episode of The Agree To Disagree Show, host Brian Engelman responds to the following statements & see where we agree and where we disagree.
On the following topics, do YOU agree or disagree?
How many shooters were involved in the plot to end President Trump?
Is there a Crowdstrike/Ukraine connection?
Did CNN really only broadcast one Trump rally in the past year & if so, why?
(Remember when CNN got to the Roger Stone arrest 30 minutes early?)
Did the same photographer catch an iconic Trump AND Bush shot?
well,... there might be two:
- "Photographer Evan Vucci has since been dubbed "Forrest Gump" for snapping two of political history's most memorable moments. Evan snapped the photo of a bloodied Trump last weekend as well as the moment Muntadhar al-Zaidi attempted to attack former president George Bush by throwing a shoe at a press conference."
When President George W. Bush was alerted to the attack on the World Trade Center 12 years ago in a Florida classroom, Doug Mills was there, camera in hand. He also snapped pics of Trump at his attack.
- For licensing & business inquiries regarding footage on this channel, please email Brian@TheNewAmericanMedia.com
Places to find The New American Media:
Contribute via: Patreon.com/TheNewAmericanMedia
Contribute via Venmo: @BrianEngelman
Check out The New American Media's home page archive at: www.TheNewAmericanMedia.com
Subscribe to: www.YouTube.com / @thenewamericanmedia
Like our Instagram page at: TheNewAmericanMedia
Follow our private group on Facebook: "TNAM's The Agree To Disagree Show"
Follow on Twitter @American_Media_
Follow The New American Media on Telegram, Signal, Truth Social, Odysee, & Rumble
Connect with our Podcast on Spotify by searching: "The Agree To Disagree Show"
We believe in our 1st amendment and free speech.
Nothing is more important than our God given right to express our opinions, ideas, questions and concerns.
We believe in our God given right to a media who is allowed to openly speak truth to power, question everything with boldness, and even mock the mockable like the court jesters of yesteryear.
The necessary exchange of ideas, suggestions, opinions, and revisions of opinions is paramount to sifting through news stories. The "act of committing journalism" is the exploration of uncharted intellectual territory, where sometimes we can only be guided by instinct and intuition. That is known as having a "nose for the news".
TNAM has a pretty stellar track record (nose for news) since 2011 and we'll put our batting average up against any other media outlet in this world, or in any worlds yet to be discovered.
We analyze rumors that can't be confirmed, we sift through "official propaganda", & we call out the lies. We NEVER want you to take our opinion as fact. Likewise, you must never take the bold claims of an official "fact checker" as accurate & you must not put your blind faith in anyone.
You must reject the fiction that two plus two equals five.
We humbly request that you do your OWN research. In the endless pursuit of truth, the social media companies prefer that we add links to "countervailing views" on the two most hot button issues of our day, so please feel free to peruse these sites for your consideration:
CISA.gov/RumorControl (regarding the 2020 election)
and CDC.gov/vaccines (regarding medical claims, and the ensuing political decisions related to the topic)
Feel free to peruse these sites and watch how they claim to know as fact that the 2020 election was the most "safe and secure election in the history of Earth".
Some other sites claim that they, (and only they), are allowed to have opinions on important matters like: "the things you must insert into your body" and "all things related to medicine".
We at TNAM ask you,...yes, YOU, to consider all of the points both FOR and AGAINST whatever "the narrative" of the day is.
The New American Media encourages you to seek truth, challenge dogma, & have fun.
Thank you,
The NEW American Media
(Because the OLD American media failed)
On today's episode of The Agree To Disagree Show, host Brian Engelman responds to the following statements & see where we agree and where we disagree.
On the following topics, do YOU agree or disagree?
How many shooters were involved in the plot to end President Trump?
Is there a Crowdstrike/Ukraine connection?
Did CNN really only broadcast one Trump rally in the past year & if so, why?
(Remember when CNN got to the Roger Stone arrest 30 minutes early?)
Did the same photographer catch an iconic Trump AND Bush shot?
well,... there might be two:
- "Photographer Evan Vucci has since been dubbed "Forrest Gump" for snapping two of political history's most memorable moments. Evan snapped the photo of a bloodied Trump last weekend as well as the moment Muntadhar al-Zaidi attempted to attack former president George Bush by throwing a shoe at a press conference."
When President George W. Bush was alerted to the attack on the World Trade Center 12 years ago in a Florida classroom, Doug Mills was there, camera in hand. He also snapped pics of Trump at his attack.
- For licensing & business inquiries regarding footage on this channel, please email Brian@TheNewAmericanMedia.com
Places to find The New American Media:
Contribute via: Patreon.com/TheNewAmericanMedia
Contribute via Venmo: @BrianEngelman
Check out The New American Media's home page archive at: www.TheNewAmericanMedia.com
Subscribe to: www.YouTube.com / @thenewamericanmedia
Like our Instagram page at: TheNewAmericanMedia
Follow our private group on Facebook: "TNAM's The Agree To Disagree Show"
Follow on Twitter @American_Media_
Follow The New American Media on Telegram, Signal, Truth Social, Odysee, & Rumble
Connect with our Podcast on Spotify by searching: "The Agree To Disagree Show"
We believe in our 1st amendment and free speech.
Nothing is more important than our God given right to express our opinions, ideas, questions and concerns.
We believe in our God given right to a media who is allowed to openly speak truth to power, question everything with boldness, and even mock the mockable like the court jesters of yesteryear.
The necessary exchange of ideas, suggestions, opinions, and revisions of opinions is paramount to sifting through news stories. The "act of committing journalism" is the exploration of uncharted intellectual territory, where sometimes we can only be guided by instinct and intuition. That is known as having a "nose for the news".
TNAM has a pretty stellar track record (nose for news) since 2011 and we'll put our batting average up against any other media outlet in this world, or in any worlds yet to be discovered.
We analyze rumors that can't be confirmed, we sift through "official propaganda", & we call out the lies. We NEVER want you to take our opinion as fact. Likewise, you must never take the bold claims of an official "fact checker" as accurate & you must not put your blind faith in anyone.
You must reject the fiction that two plus two equals five.
We humbly request that you do your OWN research. In the endless pursuit of truth, the social media companies prefer that we add links to "countervailing views" on the two most hot button issues of our day, so please feel free to peruse these sites for your consideration:
CISA.gov/RumorControl (regarding the 2020 election)
and CDC.gov/vaccines (regarding medical claims, and the ensuing political decisions related to the topic)
Feel free to peruse these sites and watch how they claim to know as fact that the 2020 election was the most "safe and secure election in the history of Earth".
Some other sites claim that they, (and only they), are allowed to have opinions on important matters like: "the things you must insert into your body" and "all things related to medicine".
We at TNAM ask you,...yes, YOU, to consider all of the points both FOR and AGAINST whatever "the narrative" of the day is.
The New American Media encourages you to seek truth, challenge dogma, & have fun.
Thank you,
The NEW American Media
(Because the OLD American media failed)
