Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Stop training and what goes first, how fast? We separate real detraining from just being busy, explain why strength fades before size, and get into muscle memory: why your gains come back faster than you built them.
Chapters:
0:00 Why the rate depends on the cause
1:12 Immobilization: how fast you lose it
2:55 Bed rest and illness
5:38 What you lose, and in what order
6:57 Muscle memory: why it comes back
Resources
barbellmedicine.com
barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/plus-podcast-subscription
barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/barbell-medicine-premium
Signal book pre-order: barbellmedicine.com/shop/learning/signal
Enhanced Games results, AP News, 25 May 2026. apnews.com/article/enhanced-games-kerley-doping-ee1ad0ff82d30b3ff38728a35198fc83
Bhasin S, et al. Supraphysiologic testosterone and muscle size and strength. N Engl J Med. 1996. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8637535
Warrier AA, et al. Performance-enhancing drugs in healthy athletes: an umbrella review. Sports Health. 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37688400
ACSM. Resistance Training Prescription... An Overview of Reviews. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2026. acsm.org/resistance-training-guidelines-update-2026
Morton RW, et al. Neither load nor systemic hormones determine RT hypertrophy or strength in trained men. J Appl Physiol. 2016. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27174923
Vieira AF, et al. Failure vs not to failure for strength, hypertrophy, power: meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33555822
Refalo MC, et al. Proximity-to-failure and hypertrophy: meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y
Borde R, et al. Dose-response of resistance training in healthy old adults: meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26420238
Cadore EL, et al. Sets to failure vs not in elderly men: randomized trial. Exp Gerontol. 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29577974
Helms ER, et al. Small vs large energy surplus in resistance-trained individuals. Sports Med Open. 2023. link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40798-023-00651-y
Longland TM, et al. Higher protein during energy deficit with intense exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26817506
STEP 1 body-composition substudy (semaglutide). J Endocr Soc. 2021. academic.oup.com/jes/article/5/Supplement_1/A16/6240360
SURMOUNT-1 body-composition substudy (tirzepatide). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025. dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16275
Forbes SC, et al. Creatine and resistance training on lean tissue and strength in older adults: meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2021. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229907
Ding P, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of paralytic ileus: Mendelian randomization. medRxiv 2024 (preprint, not peer reviewed). doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315627
Pelland JC, et al. Resistance training dose response: volume and frequency meta-regressions. Sports Med. 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41343037
Schoenfeld BJ. Mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res. 2010. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20847704
Nuell S, et al. Hamstring muscle volume and sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33555833
Sanchis-Moysi J, et al. Muscle hypertrophy in prepubescent tennis players (MRI). PLoS One. 2012. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22428074
Wang R, et al. Variable-resistance vs constant-resistance training and maximum strength: meta-analysis. IJERPH. 2022. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9317775
Retraction notice, Soria-Gila MA, et al. Variable resistance training on maximal strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30540286
Haugen ME, et al. Free-weight vs machine-based training: meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37582807
Aune D, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality: dose-response meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017. doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw319
Ding EL, et al. SHBG and risk of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009. nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0804381
Vermeulen A, et al. Estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999. academic.oup.com/jcem/article/84/10/3666/2660660
Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: Endocrine Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018. academic.oup.com/jcem/article/103/5/1715/4939465
Coleman KJ, et al. Initial validation of an exercise vital sign in EMRs. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22688832
Sallis JF, et al. Physical activity assessment, prescription and referral in US healthcare (It's Time to Move). Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33383058
Stop training and what goes first, how fast? We separate real detraining from just being busy, explain why strength fades before size, and get into muscle memory: why your gains come back faster than you built them.
Chapters:
0:00 Why the rate depends on the cause
1:12 Immobilization: how fast you lose it
2:55 Bed rest and illness
5:38 What you lose, and in what order
6:57 Muscle memory: why it comes back
Resources
barbellmedicine.com
barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/plus-podcast-subscription
barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/barbell-medicine-premium
Signal book pre-order: barbellmedicine.com/shop/learning/signal
Enhanced Games results, AP News, 25 May 2026. apnews.com/article/enhanced-games-kerley-doping-ee1ad0ff82d30b3ff38728a35198fc83
Bhasin S, et al. Supraphysiologic testosterone and muscle size and strength. N Engl J Med. 1996. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8637535
Warrier AA, et al. Performance-enhancing drugs in healthy athletes: an umbrella review. Sports Health. 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37688400
ACSM. Resistance Training Prescription... An Overview of Reviews. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2026. acsm.org/resistance-training-guidelines-update-2026
Morton RW, et al. Neither load nor systemic hormones determine RT hypertrophy or strength in trained men. J Appl Physiol. 2016. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27174923
Vieira AF, et al. Failure vs not to failure for strength, hypertrophy, power: meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33555822
Refalo MC, et al. Proximity-to-failure and hypertrophy: meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2023. doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y
Borde R, et al. Dose-response of resistance training in healthy old adults: meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26420238
Cadore EL, et al. Sets to failure vs not in elderly men: randomized trial. Exp Gerontol. 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29577974
Helms ER, et al. Small vs large energy surplus in resistance-trained individuals. Sports Med Open. 2023. link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40798-023-00651-y
Longland TM, et al. Higher protein during energy deficit with intense exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26817506
STEP 1 body-composition substudy (semaglutide). J Endocr Soc. 2021. academic.oup.com/jes/article/5/Supplement_1/A16/6240360
SURMOUNT-1 body-composition substudy (tirzepatide). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025. dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16275
Forbes SC, et al. Creatine and resistance training on lean tissue and strength in older adults: meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2021. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229907
Ding P, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk of paralytic ileus: Mendelian randomization. medRxiv 2024 (preprint, not peer reviewed). doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.24315627
Pelland JC, et al. Resistance training dose response: volume and frequency meta-regressions. Sports Med. 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41343037
Schoenfeld BJ. Mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res. 2010. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20847704
Nuell S, et al. Hamstring muscle volume and sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33555833
Sanchis-Moysi J, et al. Muscle hypertrophy in prepubescent tennis players (MRI). PLoS One. 2012. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22428074
Wang R, et al. Variable-resistance vs constant-resistance training and maximum strength: meta-analysis. IJERPH. 2022. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9317775
Retraction notice, Soria-Gila MA, et al. Variable resistance training on maximal strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30540286
Haugen ME, et al. Free-weight vs machine-based training: meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37582807
Aune D, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality: dose-response meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017. doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw319
Ding EL, et al. SHBG and risk of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009. nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0804381
Vermeulen A, et al. Estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999. academic.oup.com/jcem/article/84/10/3666/2660660
Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: Endocrine Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018. academic.oup.com/jcem/article/103/5/1715/4939465
Coleman KJ, et al. Initial validation of an exercise vital sign in EMRs. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22688832
Sallis JF, et al. Physical activity assessment, prescription and referral in US healthcare (It's Time to Move). Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33383058
![Do Running Shoes and Gait Analysis Prevent Injury?
If you are generally fit, have no performance goals, and run about 90 minutes a week, does a shoe matched to your foot shape lower your injury risk, or is comfortable enough? Does video gait analysis help? Jordan and Dr. Austin Baraki agree on the short answer: at that volume, training load management matters far more than gear.
We go through the evidence anyway. A 2024 study followed more than 7,400 recreational runners with Garmin watches for about 18 months; roughly 60% got hurt by around 600 miles, and the highest injury rates were in people running least often. Motion-control and arch-matched shoes did not reduce injuries in large military and half-marathon trials, softer cushioning looked modestly better in one study, and heel-to-toe drop made no difference, though switching abruptly to a flatter shoe can stress the Achilles and calf. Carbon-plated “super shoes” buy a few percent in running economy, which will not matter much at 90 minutes a week.
The practical version: pick shoes that are comfortable, rotate a couple of pairs, transition gradually if you change shoe type, and keep weekly mileage increases in the 20 to 30% range. Austin’s swimming-era analogy lands the point: a single session with a skilled coach to fix technique will usually beat anything you can buy. Full AMA episode and references linked below.
Resources:
Subscribe to BBM Plus for the full unabridged Direct Line: https://barbellmedicine.supercast.com/
Barbell Medicine coaching and templates: https://www.barbellmedicine.com/
Signal book pre-order: https://www.barbellmedicine.com/shop/learning/signal/
Abramson E. et al. 2024. Running-related injuries in recreational runners: a prospective cohort study using wearable trackers. Br J Sports Med [verify PMID]
Knapik J.J. et al. 2010. Injury reduction effectiveness of selecting running shoes based on plantar shape. J Strength Cond Res 24(3):685-697.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20145557/
Malisoux L. et al. 2016. Influence of the heel-to-toe drop of standard cushioned running shoes on injury risk in leisure-time runners: randomized trial. Am J Sports Med 44(11):2933-2940.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27474384/
Hoogkamer W. et al. 2018. A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes (Vaporfly). Sports Med 48(4):1009-1019.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29143929/ Do Running Shoes and Gait Analysis Prevent Injury?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hUaf_teTR9g/mqdefault.jpg)









