Uploaded March 2018 | Updated September 2026, 12 hours ago
In this episode we examine the sacred cow of evolutionists, Peer Review.
How reliable is it, really?
References:
Creationist Arguments
creation.com/creationism-science-and-peer-review
apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=2508
icr.org/article/biblical-basis-for-peer-review
answersingenesis.org/creation-science/toward-a-practical-theology-of-peer-review
Ishaq bin Ali al-Rohawi
ishim.net/ishimj/5/03.pdf
History of the Scientific Journal
arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/philosophicaltransactions
Scientific Ethics
https://www.nap.edu/read/4917/chapter/1
Peer-review Process
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622142
agronomy.org/files//publications/nse/pdfs/jnr018/018-02-0105.pdf
chans-net.org/sites/chans-net.org/files/peer_review.pdf
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John Iannidis
journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798
Believe It Or Not, Most Published Research Findings Are Probably False
bigthink.com/neurobonkers/believe-it-or-not-most-published-research-findings-are-probably-false
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons journal comment on Cold Fusion
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022072889850946
Press for Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons
cbsnews.com/news/cold-fusion-is-hot-again
Peer Reviewed criticism of Cold-Fusion
science.sciencemag.org/content/246/4931/793
journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1196
journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1926
journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.42.R1809
Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent paper on the MMR Vaccine
thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673697110960/fulltext
Papers exposing Wakefield
bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452.full
web.archive.org/web/20070810191050/http://briandeer.com/mmr/wakefield-mrc.htm
Brian Deer's Exposes
2004
briandeer.com/mmr-lancet.htm
2010
bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c1127.long
Journal of Creation(ism)
creation.com/journal-of-creation
Directory of Open-Access Journals
doaj.org
John Bohannon's Fake Journal paper
https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/179472197?q&versionId=195340411
John Bohannon's article in Science
science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
Master Journals List
mjl.clarivate.com
International Journal for Creation Research
icr.org/article/graduate-school-launch-new-science-journal
Answers Review Journal
answersingenesis.org/answers/research-journal/about
In this episode we examine the sacred cow of evolutionists, Peer Review.
How reliable is it, really?
References:
Creationist Arguments
creation.com/creationism-science-and-peer-review
apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=2508
icr.org/article/biblical-basis-for-peer-review
answersingenesis.org/creation-science/toward-a-practical-theology-of-peer-review
Ishaq bin Ali al-Rohawi
ishim.net/ishimj/5/03.pdf
History of the Scientific Journal
arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/philosophicaltransactions
Scientific Ethics
https://www.nap.edu/read/4917/chapter/1
Peer-review Process
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622142
agronomy.org/files//publications/nse/pdfs/jnr018/018-02-0105.pdf
chans-net.org/sites/chans-net.org/files/peer_review.pdf
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John Iannidis
journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798
Believe It Or Not, Most Published Research Findings Are Probably False
bigthink.com/neurobonkers/believe-it-or-not-most-published-research-findings-are-probably-false
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons journal comment on Cold Fusion
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022072889850946
Press for Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons
cbsnews.com/news/cold-fusion-is-hot-again
Peer Reviewed criticism of Cold-Fusion
science.sciencemag.org/content/246/4931/793
journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1196
journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1926
journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.42.R1809
Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent paper on the MMR Vaccine
thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673697110960/fulltext
Papers exposing Wakefield
bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452.full
web.archive.org/web/20070810191050/http://briandeer.com/mmr/wakefield-mrc.htm
Brian Deer's Exposes
2004
briandeer.com/mmr-lancet.htm
2010
bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c1127.long
Journal of Creation(ism)
creation.com/journal-of-creation
Directory of Open-Access Journals
doaj.org
John Bohannon's Fake Journal paper
https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/179472197?q&versionId=195340411
John Bohannon's article in Science
science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
Master Journals List
mjl.clarivate.com
International Journal for Creation Research
icr.org/article/graduate-school-launch-new-science-journal
Answers Review Journal
answersingenesis.org/answers/research-journal/about
![How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 81 Genetic Entropy
In this episode, we explore the creationist proof that no evolutionist can deny.
References:
Creationist Arguments
https://answersingenesis.org/store/product/genetic-entropy-mystery-genome/?sku=10-3-114
https://medium.com/@b1e1nugent/genetic-entropy-dna-mutation-rate-undermines-darwinian-evolution-3d14dbf686e3
http://www.geneticentropy.org/whats-genetic-entropy
https://creation.com/genetic-entropy
http://www.icr.org/article/genetic-entropy-points-young-creation/
https://crev.info/2011/06/110605-genetic_entropy_confirmed/
Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome
http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=4670
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00285-017-1190-x
How God Reveals Himself
http://www.creationtruthoutreach.org/hgrh.pdf
Sanfords newest paper, with William Basener regarding Fisher (1-5% rate)
http://www.geneticentropy.org/latest-development
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00285-017-1190-x
MOTOO KIMURA
Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level (1968)
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~tlusty/courses/landmark/Kimura1968.pdf
Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated (1979)
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4dd2/88a00d352fd6e7781763a4e26f373f30fc3e.pdf
The neutral theory of molecular evolution: a review of recent evidence. (1991)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1954033
[Mutation Rate]
https://www.nature.com/news/2009/090827/full/news.2009.864.html
https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(09)01454-7
Ronald Fisher The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection
https://archive.org/details/geneticaltheoryo031631mbp
George Price Fishers fundamental theorem made clear
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.366.4070&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Michael Lynch - Mutation and Human Exceptionalism: Our Future Genetic Load (2016)
https://www.genetics.org/content/202/3/869
Alexey S. Kondrashov - Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: Why have we not died 100 times over? (1995)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022519385701671
Alexey S. Kondrashov - Crumbling Genome: The Impact of Deleterious Mutations on Humans (2017)
https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Crumbling+Genome%3A+The+Impact+of+Deleterious+Mutations+on+Humans-p-9781118952115 How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 81 Genetic Entropy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z8ebvJ9bxvM/mqdefault.jpg)









