AE911Truth | Global Failure: A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of WTC 7 | Jef Bishop | October 12, 2022 @ae911truthvideos | Uploaded October 2022 | Updated October 2024, 12 hours ago.
NOTE: Engineers can earn a continuing professional development (CPD) credit for attending this webinar or watching the video of it afterward. To earn your CPD credit, go to ae911truth.org/cpd at the end of the presentation and take the short quiz. Once you get the answers right, we will email you a certificate. If you require assistance, please email CPD@AE911Truth.org.
Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why then did the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which was not struck by an airplane, suffer a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001?
This presentation outlines the findings and conclusions of a four-year study by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and provides a comprehensive critique of the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2008.
The objective of the UAF study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The principal conclusion of the UAF study, contrary to the conclusion of NIST, is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7.
For more information, visit https://AE911Truth.org.
NOTE: Engineers can earn a continuing professional development (CPD) credit for attending this webinar or watching the video of it afterward. To earn your CPD credit, go to ae911truth.org/cpd at the end of the presentation and take the short quiz. Once you get the answers right, we will email you a certificate. If you require assistance, please email CPD@AE911Truth.org.
Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why then did the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which was not struck by an airplane, suffer a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001?
This presentation outlines the findings and conclusions of a four-year study by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and provides a comprehensive critique of the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2008.
The objective of the UAF study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The principal conclusion of the UAF study, contrary to the conclusion of NIST, is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7.
For more information, visit https://AE911Truth.org.
