Uploaded October 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
After Patricia materialized overnight, I did something I almost never do: I watched The Weather Channel coverage of the event. I don’t know why I subject myself to it… when I know how infuriating it’s going to be.
I watched for an hour or so, and to put it mildly – it was quite the study in misdirection. It’s astonishing how little of the coverage had to do with actual “weather.” One would think (in a logical world) that when a Category 5 storm (the strongest storm in history) materialized overnight, the coverage would be about how that could possibly happen. On The Weather Channel however, it wasn’t the topic – at all.
The Weather Channel’s reaction to a storm materializing out of nowhere (which they obviously didn’t predict), was to continuously ‘explain’ why forecasting is so difficult. In an hour I saw the segment three times. Nothing about why the storm existed… just excuses for why they didn’t see it coming.
My regular viewers know the reason ‘meteorologists’ have such difficulty forecasting anything at all these days, because I have discussed it before: If you don’t know when and where massive Water Vapor Generation is going to occur (the fuel source for all of these insta-storms), or aren’t relying on models that factor it in, then you can’t possibly predict it. It’s why the only things ‘meteorologists’ say these days are “high / Low Pressure System is dominating,” “Monsoonal moisture,” “There’s a continuous chance of pop-up storms,” etc.
So, as always – here is the illustration of what actually happened that the “meteorologists” never show or venture to explain. As my regular viewers know, these in-place Water Vapor Bursts are the only way storms happen on this planet in 2015, so it’s not exactly new. Also as always, I invite any meteorologist with a name, face, and reputation to stake to challenge this daily provable reality, and to explain how the entire Meteorological Community can be pretending this doesn’t exist.
Please do support this continuing independent work. (PayPal)
tinyurl.com/WW101-PP
No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101
tinyurl.com/NNW-101
WW101
weatherwar101.com
---
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
After Patricia materialized overnight, I did something I almost never do: I watched The Weather Channel coverage of the event. I don’t know why I subject myself to it… when I know how infuriating it’s going to be.
I watched for an hour or so, and to put it mildly – it was quite the study in misdirection. It’s astonishing how little of the coverage had to do with actual “weather.” One would think (in a logical world) that when a Category 5 storm (the strongest storm in history) materialized overnight, the coverage would be about how that could possibly happen. On The Weather Channel however, it wasn’t the topic – at all.
The Weather Channel’s reaction to a storm materializing out of nowhere (which they obviously didn’t predict), was to continuously ‘explain’ why forecasting is so difficult. In an hour I saw the segment three times. Nothing about why the storm existed… just excuses for why they didn’t see it coming.
My regular viewers know the reason ‘meteorologists’ have such difficulty forecasting anything at all these days, because I have discussed it before: If you don’t know when and where massive Water Vapor Generation is going to occur (the fuel source for all of these insta-storms), or aren’t relying on models that factor it in, then you can’t possibly predict it. It’s why the only things ‘meteorologists’ say these days are “high / Low Pressure System is dominating,” “Monsoonal moisture,” “There’s a continuous chance of pop-up storms,” etc.
So, as always – here is the illustration of what actually happened that the “meteorologists” never show or venture to explain. As my regular viewers know, these in-place Water Vapor Bursts are the only way storms happen on this planet in 2015, so it’s not exactly new. Also as always, I invite any meteorologist with a name, face, and reputation to stake to challenge this daily provable reality, and to explain how the entire Meteorological Community can be pretending this doesn’t exist.
Please do support this continuing independent work. (PayPal)
tinyurl.com/WW101-PP
No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101
tinyurl.com/NNW-101
WW101
weatherwar101.com
---
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
