Fukushima & Risk of Low Dose Radiation w/ Angelika Claussen @MsMilkytheclown1

MsMilkytheclown1 | Fukushima & Risk of Low Dose Radiation w/ Angelika Claussen @MsMilkytheclown1 | Uploaded February 2016 | Updated October 2024, 4 hours ago.
A very informative video about the health risks of low dose radiation. Angelika Claussen: Medical Doctor & European vice-president of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) Published on Feb 4, 2016

Angelika Claussen: The Risk of Low Dose Radiation youtu.be/6ZBlptKF3zw
~~~~~~
It's very important to take into consideration internal vs. external exposure.
Challenging the ICRP Dose Model with Chris Busby - Court Update
youtu.be/wTHSYemA1U8
THE LOW LEVEL RADIATION CAMPAIGN llrc.org and greenaudit.org on greenaudit.org/papers

Meteorogical records, airflow and other factors affecting local fallout from british nuclear tests at christmas island in 1957-58.
Occasional paper 2010/12
01/12/2010 scribd.com/doc/111934965/6

Enhancement of absorbed dose from natural background gamma radiation due to photoelectron induction in uranium particles... scribd.com/doc/111934926/3

Science on trial: on the biological effects and health risks following exposure to aerosols produced by the use of depleted uranium weapons Invited presentation to the royal society london, (...) scribd.com/doc/111935043/16

Pandora's canister: a preliminary examination of the safety assessment sr-site for the skb proposed kbs-3 nuclear waste repository at forsmark sweden and associated activities relating to the disposal of spent nuclear fuel submission to: the swedish land and environmental court,(...) scribd.com/doc/111935075/21

The health effects of exposures to radioactivity from the us pacific nuclear tests in the marshall is. Criticisms of the analysis of simon et al 2010 radiation doses and cancer risks in the marshall islands associated with exposure to radioactive fallout from bikini and enewetak nuclear weapons tests (...) scribd.com/doc/111935078/22

The health outcome of the fukushima catastrophe ;initial analysis from risk model of the european committee on radiation risk ecrr occasional paper 2011/7
30th March 2011 scribd.com/doc/111935113/24

Predicting the global health consequences of the chernobyl accident;
methodology of the european committee on radiation risk
April 24th 2011 scribd.com/doc/111935124/26

Radioactivity in vehicle air filters from fukushima part i gamma emitting radionuclides.
July 2011 scribd.com/doc/111935140/27

Real data from the hiroshima bomb shows that the japanese a bomb study conclusions are false
Jan 2010 scribd.com/doc/111935207/29

Ionizing radiation and children's health: conclusions
2006 scribd.com/doc/111935211/30

Did chemical exposures of servicemen at porton down result in subsequent effects on their health? The 2005 porton down veterans support group case control study. First report.
27/07/2006 scribd.com/doc/111935224/32

Advanced biochemical and biophysicalaspects of uranium contamination
2009 scribd.com/doc/111935236/35

Fallujah uranium hair study
2011 scribd.com/doc/111935322/39

Did he use of Uranium weapons in Gulf War 2 result in contamination of Europe?
Evidence from the measurements of the Atomic eapons Establishment, Aldermaston, Berkshire, UK.
Occasional Paper 2006/1 scribd.com/doc/113416311/47

Yury Bandashevsky's first book printed and sent to Chris Busby in 2000;
the cause of Bandashevsky's imprisonment; scanned
2000 scribd.com/doc/113416703/52

Very low dose foetal exposure to Chernobyl contamination in Europe resulted in increases in infant leukemia
2009 scribd.com/doc/113416718/54

Cancer, Infant Mortality and Birth Sex-Ratio in Fallujah,
Iraq 2005--2009 scribd.com/doc/113416726/55

Not to mention all the information available HERE: llrc.org

THE LOW LEVEL RADIATION CAMPAIGN llrc.org
you can donate here: tinyurl.com/z2esn3t

Fukushima, US & Worldwide New Clear Nightmares (Nuclear Hotseat #274)

$Teslas Game Changer w/ Arnie Gundersen Historians will look back at 2015 as the turning point for producing electricity during the 21st century. The data is in: building new nuclear power plants is too expensive and takes too long. Global climate change can be prevented with a renewable electric grid that will become the new normal. The forecast is simple: dirty forms of energy like coal, nuclear, oil, and fracked gas are no longer cheaper and certainly not cleaner or safer then renewable alternative power like solar, wind, wave, and geothermal. http://tinyurl.com/jbs2773 or here http://www.fairewinds.org/nuclear-ene... Japan’s figurative leader, Emperor Akihito, broke new ground in his address to the memorial service held Aug. 15 to mark the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II expressing “feelings of deep remorse over the last war, I earnestly hope that the ravages of war will never be repeated”. Akihito’s statements are an important balance in Japan to elected Prime Minister Abe’s push to restart nuclear power and remilitarize Japan. Remilitarization is frightening for the world because Japan’s existing nuclear power plants have produced many tons of plutonium that could produce 100s of nuclear bombs, if the Japanese chose to build them. Even though more than 70% of Japan’s citizens objected to the restart of any of Japan’s 54 nuclear reactors that were shut down after the Fukushima Daiichi triple meltdown, the Abe regime started up the Sendai reactor August 11, 2015. Sadly, the reactor is only 30 miles (50 kilometers) from a very active volcano, which has people in Japan even more distressed. Does the start up of this old nuclear power plant mean that Japan and the world have reached a renaissance for nuclear power? Absolutely not! News headlines should have read, “Only one nuclear reactor out of 54 is allowed to start up” or maybe, “28 out of Japan’s original 54 reactors will never operate again due to safety risks”, rather than the worldwide headlines touting that the Japanese government pushed a single reactor to restart. Actually, for the nuclear industry, the future of nuclear power remains bleak, not just in Japan but worldwide. Why? Historians will see 2015 as a turning point in the world’s energy paradigm because viable renewable energy is now cheaper and more reliable than nuclear power will ever be. Let’s make a brief comparison: In the United Kingdom, the new Hinckley Point nuclear power plant is projected to produce power at 16¢ per kilowatt-hour, while in the United States the North Anna 3 reactor in Virginia is expected to produce power at 19¢ per kilowatt-hour. Nuclear costs continue to skyrocket upward at every plant throughout the world. At the same time the cost of renewables continued to plummet in 2015. Solar now costs less than 4¢ per kilowatt-hour, while wind now costs less than 3¢ per kilowatt-hour. But the real game changer is that the cost to store electricity has plummeted as new storage technologies are burgeoning worldwide. By thinking outside the box and starting from scratch, Elon Musk and his Tesla corporation created battery storage in which electricity costs will end up somewhere between only 2¢ and 5¢ per kilowatt hour. For years the nuclear industry has claimed that only nuclear power could generate fossil-free energy when the wind was not blowing and the sun was not shining. Engineering ingenuity has created incredible advances, so that solar electricity plus storage cost less than 9¢ and wind electricity plus storage now is less than 8¢. Compare these consumer friendly costs to nuclear power that is now at least twice as expensive. Nuclear power still has a horrendous legacy of toxic radioactive waste that humankind and its nuclear industry still cannot figure out how to store for 250,000 years. Yet, Musk and Tesla have clearly shown that humankind can store solar electricity overnight. You may have heard me say before that building new nuclear power plants will make global climate change worse. First, designing and building each new nuclear plant will take between 15 and 20 years, just look at the Areva nuclear design failures in Finland and in France leading to at least a decade long delay. Vogtle in GA has been under construction for the past three years and is now three years behind schedule. And, such a waste of money on nuclear power will take that money away from the renewables that can come to market more economically and cleanly. Why would anyone want to spend 16¢ for electricity generated by a power plant that takes so long to build when electricity produced for less than half that price could be available in less than one year?(...) The Fairewinds Energy Education web site http://www.fairewinds.org/ consider donating here: http://www.fairewinds.org/ Sign up for updates here http://fairewindsenergy.nationbuilder...$

Fukushima: Tell-All Behind the Scenes: NRC (FOIA documents)

Fukushima & MANY Nuke Problems w/ Joseph Mangano (Nuclear Hotseat #242)

WIPP Burns 2 Lifelines Answering Nuclear Questions (Townhall Meeting 6/2/16)

Nuclear Racketeering & Back-Up Generator Lies w/ Greg Palast (Nuclear Hotseat #264)

Fukushima Worker on Verge of Breakdown The Earth Around Me Distorting Like Jell-O

Fukushima 5 Years of Catastrophic Fallout & No End in Sight (Nuclear Hotseat #246)

Fukushima Meltdowns: Fmr PM Kan Reflects & OPPOSES Nuclear Energy 9/10/15

New: Fukushima & The Expanding Circle of Death (Rense) 8/29/16

Radioactive Dangers at Columbia Generating Station & Hanford