Uploaded September 2021 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Side Event at the Thematic Sessions of the #AfricaClimateWeek 2021: Agricultural production is highly weather-dependent in sub-Saharan Africa. The risk of yield losses increases even further under climate change, posing a threat to farmers’ income and livelihood. However, despite the availability of a wide range of adaptation strategies, information on their suitability at the local scale is limited. In this session, ways towards risk-informed adaptation policy-making and actions for climate-resilient development are discussed. A recent collaborative research project in northern Ghana conducted a study that identified adaptation options suitable to minimize present and future climate impacts. Based on results from this study the event seeks to identify best practices and design principles for better integrating climate information into adaptation actions on a local and regional scale.
Side Event at the Thematic Sessions of the #AfricaClimateWeek 2021: Agricultural production is highly weather-dependent in sub-Saharan Africa. The risk of yield losses increases even further under climate change, posing a threat to farmers’ income and livelihood. However, despite the availability of a wide range of adaptation strategies, information on their suitability at the local scale is limited. In this session, ways towards risk-informed adaptation policy-making and actions for climate-resilient development are discussed. A recent collaborative research project in northern Ghana conducted a study that identified adaptation options suitable to minimize present and future climate impacts. Based on results from this study the event seeks to identify best practices and design principles for better integrating climate information into adaptation actions on a local and regional scale.





![What Counts for our Climate: Carbon Budgets Untangled
The more CO2 we emit from burning coal and oil and gas, the more we heat our climate – this sounds simple, and it is. Different analyses have come up with different estimates of how much CO2 humankind can still emit if we want to hold global warming to the internationally agreed 1.5 and well below 2 degrees Celsius limits, but a lack of clarity of the reasons causing these variations has created unnecessary confusion, a new study shows. It identifies the relevant factors that affect estimates of these remaining carbon budgets and thereby untangles the differences to make estimates more easily comparable, which will help decision-makers in using them. From a climate policy perspective, the bottom line remains the same. Even if the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5°C would increase by a half, we would have only 10 years more time before emissions have to be brought down to net zero.
For more info see here:
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/what-counts-for-our-climate-carbon-budgets-untangled
Article: Joeri Rogelj, Piers M. Forster, Elmar Kriegler, Christopher J. Smith, Roland Séférian (2019): Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets. Nature [DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z]
Weblink to the article: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z What Counts for our Climate: Carbon Budgets Untangled](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/poHNsxbgHig/mqdefault.jpg)




