Uploaded February 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago

---

In this video I put four cycling radars through real-world road testing to see if they can reliably detect approaching vehicles and provide the safety awareness riders depend on. Three of these units showed behaviour that I consider unsafe, with false negatives, early clearance warnings, and sensor dropouts that simply shouldn’t happen in a device marketed for rider safety. Only one performed well enough to inspire confidence, and that raises bigger questions about what’s being released to market.

Reviewed in this video are the Ravemen NT201, Coospo TR70, RideNow RT01, and Enfitnix RR01 cycling radars.

➡️ SUBSCRIBE to The GPLAMA YouTube Channel: goo.gl/QS5YZg
📸 GPLama Instagram: instagram.com/gplama

Links:
Garmin RTL515 Radar Review: youtu.be/UTLIeaRKN6c
Wahoo TRACKR Radar Review: youtu.be/zpcNuEycF9c
LEZYNE Radar Review: youtu.be/T8nXaQvZ_Hc
Garmin Varia RearVUE 820 Review: youtu.be//WxJRZutFL3g
Sigma RECO Radar Review: youtu.be/RvrLjvFWHEE
Magene L508 Review: youtu.be/HdCNEXyeXPM
Bryton Gardia R300L Review: youtu.be/ms68enWvBlg

Video Index:
0:00 Intro
1:04 Technical Overview
3:02 RideNow RT01
4:04 Coospo TR70
5:52 Ravemen NT201
6:47 Enfitnix RR01
8:14 Summary
10:00 Wrap Up

#Cycling #Radar #RearLights
-------------
gplama.com