Uploaded December 2019 | Updated September 2026, 1 minute ago
Julie Simms tells an engaging story of how she alleviated her migraine headaches by limiting her exposure to fluoride and fluoridated water. Julie is one of many fluoride sensitive people that have seen relief once fluoride is removed from their diet.
Please watch and share this video. By amplifying the voices of the victims of fluoridation, we can show the unnecessary cruelty of adding this chemical to everyone's drinking water without regard for dose, medical history, or individual reactions. If our politicians cannot ensure it is safe for everyone, then it shouldn't be forced on anyone!
We're working hard to end water fluoridation, raising funds for 2020. You can support the Fluoride Action Network with a tax-deductible donation today: donatenow.networkforgood.org/1415005
More on fluoride hypersensitivity here: fluoridealert.org/issues/health/hypersensitivity
Julie Simms tells an engaging story of how she alleviated her migraine headaches by limiting her exposure to fluoride and fluoridated water. Julie is one of many fluoride sensitive people that have seen relief once fluoride is removed from their diet.
Please watch and share this video. By amplifying the voices of the victims of fluoridation, we can show the unnecessary cruelty of adding this chemical to everyone's drinking water without regard for dose, medical history, or individual reactions. If our politicians cannot ensure it is safe for everyone, then it shouldn't be forced on anyone!
We're working hard to end water fluoridation, raising funds for 2020. You can support the Fluoride Action Network with a tax-deductible donation today: donatenow.networkforgood.org/1415005
More on fluoride hypersensitivity here: fluoridealert.org/issues/health/hypersensitivity


![Debunked: Study Finding Huge Increase In IQ From Fluoride Exposure Is Biologically Impossible
During the Fluoride Lawsuit, EPA tried to use a single study from the Basque region of Spain that found a huge increase in IQ as a centerpiece of its argument that there was too much uncertainty to conclude fluoridated water was neurotoxic. Extensive testimony was obtained from both sides about this study, including almost two hours of deposition from the lead author of the Basque study, Jesus Ibarluzea. Tellingly, despite originally intended by EPA to be a star witness, Ibarluzea withdrew from the case before the trial, which may have further reduced the credibility of his study in the court’s eyes.
The court ruling addressed the Ibarluzea study in depth and agreed it had many of the problems that had been pointed out during trial testimony. The court’s ruling said:
“The reliability of Ibarluzea (2021) is questionable in several respects: ... [followed by 2 pages of detailed reasons why the court considered the Ibarluzea study of questionable reliability; Court ruling, pp. 27-29]
… as also explained previously, particular characteristics of these studies finding null outcomes render them less probative here.... Ibarluzea (2021) found an unrealistic 15-point IQ benefit, included unexplained and implausible results regarding creatinine adjustments, and failed to control for seafood [Court ruling, p. 39]
This video is available to help those wishing to understand why the court agreed that the Ibarluzea study deserved little weight. Debunked: Study Finding Huge Increase In IQ From Fluoride Exposure Is Biologically Impossible](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KU-XtSv3kqg/mqdefault.jpg)







