Flowers Claims Allen Has Addressed James Whites Argument Regarding 1 John 2:29, 4:7, and 5:1 @TurretinFan
Flowers Claims Allen Has Addressed James Whites Argument Regarding 1 John 2:29, 4:7, and 5:1  @TurretinFan
Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 22 hours ago
@Soteriology101 's Claim that he and @DrDavidLAllen addressed @HwsEleutheroi 's Argument Regarding 1 John 2:29, 1 John 4:7, and 1 John 5:1

Leighton Flowers exhorts Dr. White to "Read more carefully please" in his tweet of a few hours ago. We dismantle this retort.
The challenge/argument:
https://x.com/HwsEleutheroi/status/1988459990110396457

Part 1:
youtube.com/watch?v=NM3FFk4AeTg

Part 2:
youtube.com/watch?v=dpRfQSM6P_0
Flowers Claims Allen Has Addressed James Whites Argument Regarding 1 John 2:29, 4:7, and 5:1Debate Review: Predestination Debate | TurretinFan vs. Chuck Kraus | CIC 2026-17Response to a Review of the Mass And Eucharist Debate between Robert Sungenis and Dan ChapaIsidore of Seville - Part 2 - the Canon of Scripture (and some other things)Baruch and 4 Esdras | Canonical Problems | CIC 2025-28Bekirbecha: In Thy Midst or Among You?2017 - Apostolic Fathers & Canon Debate - TurretinFan vs. William AlbrechtThe Received Text: a Field Guide, ReviewedResponding to Ditmar Hoxhas Chapter 4: Eternal SecurityResponding to Ditmar Hoxha on James 2 (Chapter IX) - Part 2 | CIC 2025-05bisJerome and the Western Canon - CIC 2025-11Lets Discuss Hebrews 7-10 | CIC 2025-07
TurretinFan |

Flowers Claims Allen Has Addressed James White's Argument Regarding 1 John 2:29, 4:7, and 5:1

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER