Flight Simulator 2000: Simple Graphic Comparison @FS2004ACoF
Flight Simulator 2000: Simple Graphic Comparison  @FS2004ACoF
Uploaded January 2011 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
FSfW95:
(Wo)man, I need a good screen recorder for FSfW95. FRAPS never detects it since it's not a DirectX or OpenGL application.

FS2002 Pro: I still don't have it, and my father ordered it at the 22nd of December of 2010. The order was canceled for some unknown reason.

Back on topic...
Well, notice in the Software Rendered Mode the graphics are choppy. The frame rates are lower than with the 3D Hardware Acceleration Mode on but suffer less loss on cities. They drop at dawn/dusk and speed up at night.

Then 3D Hardware Acceleration Mode has smoother frame rates but they drop worse at cities, but that's because of I have an integrated video card.
Flight Simulator 2000: Simple Graphic ComparisonFlight Simulator 2000: Formation Flight at ChicagoFlight Simulator 2000: KilimanjaroFlight Simulator 2004: Landing at El Monte (KEMT)Flight Simulator 2002: Windy Landing at Innsbruck (LOWI)Flight Simulator 2004: Aproach, Landing, and Parking at Boeing Field runway 31RFlight Simulator 98: Exploring  Tromsø, NorwayFlight Simulator 2002: Landing Crashed PlanesFlight Simulator 98: Between New Yorks BuildingsFlight Simulator 2004: Stupid Epic FailFlight Simulator 2000 Adventure: Belly DancingCombat Flight Simulator: Aerobatics in Hong Kong
FS2004ACoF |

Flight Simulator 2000: Simple Graphic Comparison

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER