rockets push off air | ExploreAir LINE OF SIGHT SIGNAL Beirut to Cyprus possible flat earth proof no data regarding towers @rocketspushoffair | Uploaded March 2018 | Updated October 2024, 13 hours ago.
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3666/can-i-see-lebanon-from-cyprus See the photos near the end of the page from Kantara Castle [Kantara is situated on an altitude of 550–600 metres (1,800–1,970 ft) above sea level. The castle is surrounded by ridges of barren granite and sandstone bedrock which were used as the main building materials for the castle's construction.] He could see THE COAST of Lebanon!
flatearthtextbook.blogspot.ca/2016/10 Part 2 of this video shows a railgun that has a 100 mile range at MACH 7 3:33 tellmewhatyoulove channel gets credit for the railgun music & audio mix youtube.com/user/tellmewhatyoulove The height of the towers is stated as 50 feet according to a phone call made to the company. This means that you need to clear over 2.5 miles high on the opposite side to create a line of sight connection. No mention of curve at all in the press release exaltcom.com/pressRelease.aspx?id=4256 And no mention of towers. This is obviously due to the fact that even if you had a 2000 foot tower sending a signal, you would require over 6000 feet on the opposite side, so they chose not to speak about these globe-destroying facts. This has caused some deniers to suggest that the mountains were used, but even this cannot save the day
Unfortunately for globe-heads, the hump in between the two points is 3500 feet for a 150 mile distance. This makes the towers irrelevant, even at 2000 feet. Why did they leave this out of the press release? Because it did not use towers anywhere near that height. Here's why, this is supposed to be the most cost effective solution, even less than renting underwater sea cables according to their website, the unit costs about $7000 or less for 7 G and towers cost $1000 per foot up to 2000 feet. The target market like poor outlying regions, developing nations, etc. are not going to invest millions in towers over a few thousand dollar device. But at the end of the day, the towers are going to be too short anyways. No chance for the globe.
EARTH CURVE CALCULATOR dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=150&h0=50&unit=imperial
The railgun was designed to work on flat earth, period. The RANGE is a *HORIZONTAL LINE* indicating quite clearly that this ballistics trajectory calculator is a flat earth based calculator. I was given the following link by a challenger in the comments below:
convertalot.com/ballistic_trajectory_calculator.html
They should have some tests showing the height of the cannon above ground and exactly what angle they used and exactly what the ACTUAL RESULT (RANGE) was. Just throwing around a calculator does not prove A THING!
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/3666/can-i-see-lebanon-from-cyprus See the photos near the end of the page from Kantara Castle [Kantara is situated on an altitude of 550–600 metres (1,800–1,970 ft) above sea level. The castle is surrounded by ridges of barren granite and sandstone bedrock which were used as the main building materials for the castle's construction.] He could see THE COAST of Lebanon!
flatearthtextbook.blogspot.ca/2016/10 Part 2 of this video shows a railgun that has a 100 mile range at MACH 7 3:33 tellmewhatyoulove channel gets credit for the railgun music & audio mix youtube.com/user/tellmewhatyoulove The height of the towers is stated as 50 feet according to a phone call made to the company. This means that you need to clear over 2.5 miles high on the opposite side to create a line of sight connection. No mention of curve at all in the press release exaltcom.com/pressRelease.aspx?id=4256 And no mention of towers. This is obviously due to the fact that even if you had a 2000 foot tower sending a signal, you would require over 6000 feet on the opposite side, so they chose not to speak about these globe-destroying facts. This has caused some deniers to suggest that the mountains were used, but even this cannot save the day
Unfortunately for globe-heads, the hump in between the two points is 3500 feet for a 150 mile distance. This makes the towers irrelevant, even at 2000 feet. Why did they leave this out of the press release? Because it did not use towers anywhere near that height. Here's why, this is supposed to be the most cost effective solution, even less than renting underwater sea cables according to their website, the unit costs about $7000 or less for 7 G and towers cost $1000 per foot up to 2000 feet. The target market like poor outlying regions, developing nations, etc. are not going to invest millions in towers over a few thousand dollar device. But at the end of the day, the towers are going to be too short anyways. No chance for the globe.
EARTH CURVE CALCULATOR dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=150&h0=50&unit=imperial
The railgun was designed to work on flat earth, period. The RANGE is a *HORIZONTAL LINE* indicating quite clearly that this ballistics trajectory calculator is a flat earth based calculator. I was given the following link by a challenger in the comments below:
convertalot.com/ballistic_trajectory_calculator.html
They should have some tests showing the height of the cannon above ground and exactly what angle they used and exactly what the ACTUAL RESULT (RANGE) was. Just throwing around a calculator does not prove A THING!
