Evolution 2.0 | Evolution Debate: Richard Dawkins Has Done More Damage To Science than Almost Anyone @Evolution2 | Uploaded December 2015 | Updated October 2024, 10 hours ago.
This video is about the Evolution Debate.
Click here to get 3 free chapters - a Communication Engineer’s adventure through the creation-evolution divide:
cosmicfingerprints.com/?3-FREE-CHAPTERS
I don’t have a problem with atheists.
If you look at all the scientific data out there…
• What we know about genetics…
• What we know about the origin of life…
• All we know about the birth of the universe…
• How life changes and evolves…
• Where humans came from, and why we think and feel like we do…
If you take a look at all of that — and all the big questions it raises — and you decide there’s no God behind it all, I won’t fault you.
There’s no instrument in modern science that lets us hear God speak, in the way we hear each other speak. Nobody has ever taken a photograph of God.
If you’re waiting on that kind of evidence, I understand that.
The problem comes when you go from atheist to Atheist — with a capital A.
That’s the kind of Atheism Richard Dawkins espouses, and it’s flat-out dangerous to scientific enquiry — it’s literally destroying real science.
When someone like Richard Dawkins adds the capital A to Atheism, he’s subject to the same kind of empty dogma he criticizes from other religions.
And any time you shut down the mystery, the discovery, the ability to be swayed by new evidence, the willingness to forfeit past beliefs to new realization…
You’re no longer a scientist. You’re a dogmatist.
This video reveals what I think of Richard Dawkins’ explanation of the origin of life and evolution…
This video is about the Evolution Debate.
Click here to get 3 free chapters - a Communication Engineer’s adventure through the creation-evolution divide:
cosmicfingerprints.com/?3-FREE-CHAPTERS
I don’t have a problem with atheists.
If you look at all the scientific data out there…
• What we know about genetics…
• What we know about the origin of life…
• All we know about the birth of the universe…
• How life changes and evolves…
• Where humans came from, and why we think and feel like we do…
If you take a look at all of that — and all the big questions it raises — and you decide there’s no God behind it all, I won’t fault you.
There’s no instrument in modern science that lets us hear God speak, in the way we hear each other speak. Nobody has ever taken a photograph of God.
If you’re waiting on that kind of evidence, I understand that.
The problem comes when you go from atheist to Atheist — with a capital A.
That’s the kind of Atheism Richard Dawkins espouses, and it’s flat-out dangerous to scientific enquiry — it’s literally destroying real science.
When someone like Richard Dawkins adds the capital A to Atheism, he’s subject to the same kind of empty dogma he criticizes from other religions.
And any time you shut down the mystery, the discovery, the ability to be swayed by new evidence, the willingness to forfeit past beliefs to new realization…
You’re no longer a scientist. You’re a dogmatist.
This video reveals what I think of Richard Dawkins’ explanation of the origin of life and evolution…
