Uploaded October 2018 | Updated September 2026, 3 days ago
What is meant by ‘birthright citizenship’? ...The 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1868 and intended to clarify the post-Civil War status of former slaves, begins, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." That has been mistakenly taken to mean that being born on U.S. soil -- even to parents who are just passing through -- guarantees American citizenship to the child.
Has this been challenged before?
Many times, especially since the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" left room for debate over who exactly should qualify for this right. In an 1898 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that a child born in the U.S. to Chinese parents who "have a permanent domicil(e) and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States." Critics of birthright citizenship say that shouldn’t apply to immigrants living in the U.S. without proper authorization. Some members of U.S. Congress have been trying for years to withhold birthright citizenship from children with two unauthorized parents.
What does Trump say?
As a candidate, he said babies born on U.S. soil to parents who are not in the country legally shouldn’t have American citizenship. He called them "anchor babies" because once they become adults, they can petition for their parents to gain legal residency in the U.S. As president, Trump now says he will sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil.
Can he do that?
Not without a fight. In general, changing the U.S. Constitution requires an amendment that passes Congress by a two-thirds majority and then gets ratified by at least 38 of the 50 states -- a high bar. Trump doesn’t see that as the only route. "It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment. Guess what? You don’t," he said in an interview with "Axios on HBO." But any attempt to change the citizenship process by presidential order -- or even by standard congressional lawmaking -- would surely prompt a legal challenge.
How many people get to be U.S. citizens this way?
The Migration Policy Institute estimated in 2015 that there were 4.1 million children (under age 18) who at birth had both U.S. citizenship and at least one unauthorized immigrant parent -- meaning they potentially could owe their citizenship solely to the birthright provision (unless their other parent was American). The Pew Research Center estimated that 275,000 babies were born to unauthorized-immigrant parents in 2014, or about 7 percent of the 4 million births in the U.S. that year.
Is the U.S. alone?
European countries require a period of residency before bestowing citizenship on those born to foreign parents. But many countries in the Americas, including Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, have U.S.-style birthright citizenship.
The history behind the Amendment
The 14th Amendment was passed by Congress in 1866 after the Civil War and during the period of Reconstruction. The amendment was ratified on July 9, 1868 by three-fourths of the states. By extending citizenship to those born in the U.S., the amendment nullified an 1857 Supreme Court decision — Dred Scott v. Sandford, which had held that those descended from slaves could not be citizens.
What is meant by ‘birthright citizenship’? ...The 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1868 and intended to clarify the post-Civil War status of former slaves, begins, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." That has been mistakenly taken to mean that being born on U.S. soil -- even to parents who are just passing through -- guarantees American citizenship to the child.
Has this been challenged before?
Many times, especially since the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" left room for debate over who exactly should qualify for this right. In an 1898 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that a child born in the U.S. to Chinese parents who "have a permanent domicil(e) and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States." Critics of birthright citizenship say that shouldn’t apply to immigrants living in the U.S. without proper authorization. Some members of U.S. Congress have been trying for years to withhold birthright citizenship from children with two unauthorized parents.
What does Trump say?
As a candidate, he said babies born on U.S. soil to parents who are not in the country legally shouldn’t have American citizenship. He called them "anchor babies" because once they become adults, they can petition for their parents to gain legal residency in the U.S. As president, Trump now says he will sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil.
Can he do that?
Not without a fight. In general, changing the U.S. Constitution requires an amendment that passes Congress by a two-thirds majority and then gets ratified by at least 38 of the 50 states -- a high bar. Trump doesn’t see that as the only route. "It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment. Guess what? You don’t," he said in an interview with "Axios on HBO." But any attempt to change the citizenship process by presidential order -- or even by standard congressional lawmaking -- would surely prompt a legal challenge.
How many people get to be U.S. citizens this way?
The Migration Policy Institute estimated in 2015 that there were 4.1 million children (under age 18) who at birth had both U.S. citizenship and at least one unauthorized immigrant parent -- meaning they potentially could owe their citizenship solely to the birthright provision (unless their other parent was American). The Pew Research Center estimated that 275,000 babies were born to unauthorized-immigrant parents in 2014, or about 7 percent of the 4 million births in the U.S. that year.
Is the U.S. alone?
European countries require a period of residency before bestowing citizenship on those born to foreign parents. But many countries in the Americas, including Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, have U.S.-style birthright citizenship.
The history behind the Amendment
The 14th Amendment was passed by Congress in 1866 after the Civil War and during the period of Reconstruction. The amendment was ratified on July 9, 1868 by three-fourths of the states. By extending citizenship to those born in the U.S., the amendment nullified an 1857 Supreme Court decision — Dred Scott v. Sandford, which had held that those descended from slaves could not be citizens.

![Great Analysis Of Kamalas Audio Earring Conspiracy - What Are The Odds?
Credit:@scottroofwalkerCompany on youtube and MAGA Ogre - Tech Company says Kamala Harris’ debate earrings strikingly similar to its Bluetooth device, offers to make ones for Trump- Kamala Harris’ debate earrings trigger conspiracy theories among Trump supporters - Some conspiracy-minded supporters of former President Donald Trump have claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris got secret — and unfair — help in her Tuesday night debate against the Republican nominee. The theory goes like this: Harris’ earrings contained a clandestine Bluetooth device that enabled her to be coached by unseen aides during the ABC News forum in Philadelphia, in flagrant violation of the rules set out by the Disney-owned network.One X user dubbed The Maverick Approach, a self-described “alternative news source,” peddled a claim early Wednesday that Harris had been fitted with a pair of smart earrings developed by a German company.
“There’s a major issue with this debate,” they posted. “I told myself she was fed what to say during the debate and my hunch was right. Nova is the world’s first and only wireless earphone earrings.”
However, the NOVA H1 Audio Earrings look very different than the ones that Harris donned during the verbal bout, except for the fact that both include pearls.
The veep’s actual earrings appeared to be a gold version of the Double Pearl Hinged Earrings from Tiffany & Co, which is not known to include electronics in its luxury jewelry.
The clip-on NOVA H1 Audio Earrings sell for about $625 apiece and are able to “project sound from inside the pearl straight into your ear canal,” according to its Kickstarter page, which appears to have been dormant since last year and includes comments suggesting people hadn’t received the product despite chipping in cash.
“These Earrings are fully packed with the latest technology embedded in real pearls to provide you with music, phone calls and digital assistants all day long,” the site added.
In the past, Harris has bashed Bluetooth earpieces as a security threat and has been spotted using wired earbuds on the campaign trail.
Despite the evidence, the theory was amplified in the r/conspiracy Subreddit and widely disseminated on social media.
The Maverick Approach’s post quickly notched nearly 100,000 views before they appeared to concede the hoax.
“I can’t believe how easy it is to troll and get everybody worked up,” The Maverick Approach later wrote on X.
“This is how politicians do it. FYI she was terrible and was terrible all on her own. She didn’t need any help with that! If she did have an earpiece, that’s even worse the fact she had help and still loss [sic].”In both the 2020 and 2016 election cycles, similar theories spread on social media claiming President Biden and Hillary Clinton were using earpieces during their debates against Trump.
Fact-checking websites quickly shot down those bizarre claims.
Wednesday morning, Trump himself suggested that Harris had received advance knowledge of what would be discussed.
“They had a rigged show with somebody that maybe even had the answers,” the 78-year-old told “Fox & Friends”.
“I mean, I’ll be honest, I watched her talk and I said, ‘You know, she seems awfully familiar with the questions.” A tech company has added fuel to the Kamala Harris earrings conspiracy theory after quipping that her debate night jewelry is strikingly similar to the Bluetooth devices it makes — and has even offered to design “orange” ones for Donald Trump.
Claims that Harris, 59, was fitted with clip-on audio headphones disguised as pearl earrings for her showdown against the former president, 78, have been spreading like wildfire on social media in the wake of Tuesday’s presidential debate.
Now, Germany-based company Icebach Sound Solutions has weighed in on the viral saga after conspiracy-minded Trump supporters claimed the vice president was wearing a pair of its Bluetooth devices — the Nova H1 Audio Earring.
We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it,” Icebach’s managing director, Malte Iversen, said in a tongue-in-cheek statement to tech outlet Tom’s Guide.
“To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice of color is a bit challenging though as orange does not go well with a lot of colors.”
Meanwhile, the company has also vowed to clear up the “rumors and myths surrounding our wonderful products” during a forthcoming appearance on “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon.”
“Following the presidential debate we have been contacted by numerous TV shows for interviews,” a message on the Munich-based company’s website states.
#election2024 #KamalaHarris #Trump Great Analysis Of Kamalas Audio Earring Conspiracy - What Are The Odds?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q7l0m8-Sr6Y/mqdefault.jpg)


![Jesse Jackson Thanks & Praises Trump for Helping Blacks - Lifetime of Service
Archive Flashback : Jesse Jackson praises and thanks Donald Trump for a lifetime of service to African Americans. When Trump was a private citizen and used his billions to help black communities, the real estate mogul had the praise of none other than Jesse Jackson. Back in 1998 and 1999, Trump worked with Jackson’s Rainbow/PUSH coalition to help offer a way to get African Americans into corporate America and improve their communities through building projects and jobs. Jackson praised Trump’s savvy business aplomb not once, but twice.
We need your building skills, your gusto, your [unintelligible] for people on Wall Street to represent diversity, and we thank you for coming tonight. Let’s give Donald Trump a big hand, Jackson said at an event captured by C-SPAN cameras.
At another event a year later, Jackson introduced his friend and thanked Trump for giving blacks a face on Wall Street.
When we opened this Wall Street project and we talked about it, you gave us face at 40 Wall Street, which was to make a statement about our having a presence there, said Jackson. Beyond that in terms of reaching out and being inclusive, he’s done that, too.
Jackson also applauded Trump’s will to make things better for the underserved communities. In addition, Jackson thanked Trump for meeting with him in 1984 and in 1988 when he ran for president at a time when the United States would’ve found the idea of a black president laughable.
When Trump got up to speak at that event, he praised the skilled workmanship of blacks and other minorities.
#Trump #MAGA #Flashback
Music: The Delta (lil mo trappy) by Dhruva Aliman
https://dhruvaaliman.bandcamp.com/album/road-of-fortunes
http://www.dhruvaaliman.com/
Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/artist/5XiFCr9iBKE6Cupltgnlet Jesse Jackson Thanks & Praises Trump for Helping Blacks - Lifetime of Service](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QhEWQIFCd_4/mqdefault.jpg)



![Very Brave Mexican Senator Risks Life Asking Trump To Hit Cartels - Lilly Tellez
Mexican Sen. Lilly Tellez discusses the alleged infiltration of cartels in the Mexican government and President Donald Trump’s potential role in solving the conflict on ‘Fox & Friends Weekend.’ - Senator Lilly Téllez said that US aid in combating cartels in Mexico is welcome, and that the only ones who dont like Trumps attempt to help are the narco-politicians. - During a recent appearance on “Fox & Friends Weekend,” Mexican Senator Lilly Tellez shed light on the alarming issue of cartel infiltration within the Mexican government. In her candid discussion, Tellez expressed grave concerns about the pervasive influence of drug cartels, which she claims have not only undermined public safety but also infiltrated governmental institutions at various levels.
Tellez pointed to numerous instances in which cartels have allegedly exerted control over political processes and even colluded with officials. This troubling dynamic, she argued, poses significant challenges to governance and the rule of law in Mexico. She emphasized that the Mexican public is increasingly aware of the ties between organized crime and certain government officials, a reality she believes hampers efforts to combat drug-related violence and corruption.
In addressing potential solutions to the crisis, Tellez turned her attention to former President Donald Trump’s approach to border security and drug trafficking during his administration. She praised Trump’s emphasis on building a wall and enhancing border controls as effective measures that contributed to reducing drug flow into the United States. Tellez contended that a robust collaboration between the U.S. and Mexico could play a crucial role in tackling the cartel problem, advocating for increased support and coordinated efforts to confront the violence.
The senator’s remarks highlight the growing recognition of the complex interplay between crime, governance, and international relations. As the conversation around cartel violence and its implications for both nations continues to evolve, Tellez’s stance underscores the urgent need for decisive action and collaborative strategies aimed at dismantling cartel networks that threaten stability and security in Mexico.
Mexican Senator Lilly Téllez engaged in a war of words with President Claudia Sheinbaum Thursday and Friday after telling Fox News that most Mexicans would welcome U.S. assistance in the war against drug cartels.
Téllez, a member of the conservative National Action Party (PAN), angered President Sheinbaum and members of the ruling Morena party by referring to them on Wednesday as narco-politicians resisting the U.S. offer to battle the cartels.
Sheinbaum responded by calling Téllez a traitor for encouraging U.S. intervention.
“It’s not a minor issue that a senator gave an interview to a foreign media outlet calling for intervention,” Sheinbaum said.
Téllez clapped back with a lengthy statement on social media, contending she said no such thing.
“What I said was ‘help’ (cooperation and consent), not ‘intervention’ (violation of sovereignty). … Speaking of help is a political act that is realized through the will of the parties, it is freedom of expression and parliamentary inviolability, not a crime,” she wrote.
Téllez told Rachel Campos-Duffy that the U.S. offer to help Mexico fight drug cartels “is absolutely welcome,” assuring the Fox News host that “this is the opinion of the majority of Mexicans.”
“The only people opposed to the offer to help us … are the narco-politicians, which includes President Sheinbaum and her entire group,” Téllez said, pointing to the president’s recent endorsement of Morena Senator Adán Augusto López.
López is accused by the opposition of ties to organized crime in the state of Tabasco, stemming from his relationship to his hand-picked state security minister Hernán Bermúdez, a fugitive who is the alleged leader of the La Barredora crime gang.
Sheinbaum ratified López as the leader of the Morena caucus in the Senate.
Telléz, a former member of Morena, said the ratification proves that the Sheinbaum administration is “infiltrated by the drug cartels,” which have been labeled as terrorists by the U.S. government.
“This government is clearly associated with the cartels,” she said, adding that this is why Sheinbaum has been “angered by [U.S. President Donald] Trump’s offer to help” while her administration “is doing everything it can to obstruct” U.S. efforts to take on the drug cartels.
The PAN senator said Mexicans are fed up with the violence and corruption cultivated by organized crime gangs, asserting her view that Morena is protecting the cartels, which is “the genuine treason against the homeland.”
Téllez also criticized Sheinbaum’s foreign policy stance, accusing her of preferring ideological alliances (citing Venezuela and Cuba) over security cooperations (citing Sheinbaum’s public denial of cooperation with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration).
#trump #mexico #military Very Brave Mexican Senator Risks Life Asking Trump To Hit Cartels - Lilly Tellez](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SOn_9L8ZEy4/mqdefault.jpg)

