Eric Finster: Dependetopes and Higher Generalized Algebraic Theories @ToposInstitute
Eric Finster: Dependetopes and Higher Generalized Algebraic Theories  @ToposInstitute
Uploaded September 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Topos Institute Colloquium, 11th of September 2025.
———
Many of the classical tools of categorical algebra can be generalized
to the world of higher algebra, that is, the study of algebraic
structures on homotopy types. Indeed we can talk about ∞-Lawvere
theories, ∞-finite limit theories, classifying ∞-topoi, ∞-operads and
so on. That we can define and reason about such higher algebraic
theories is a result of the well-developed theory of (∞,1)-categories
of Joyal and Lurie, and ultimately relies on the tractability of
working combinatorially with simplices.

Type theorists and computer scientists often work with presentations
of algebraic theories using dependent types, so-called "Generalized
Algebraic Theories", exactly because they have convenient syntactic
descriptions which lend themselves to computer implementation. We can
generalize the categorical semantics of these theories to the higher
setting using the tools above, but doing so renders the connection to
concrete syntax somewhat tenuous.

In this talk I'll introduce a method for recovering a more syntactic
description of the notion of higher generalized algebraic theory by
introducing the category of dependetopes. The name derives from the
fact that the dependetopes can be understood as a dependently typed
extension of Baez-Dolan's notion of opetope which captures the higher
geometry of type-dependency. In addition to their definition, I will
explain how the dependetopes come with a concrete syntax arising from
type theory, which can be used to define and manipulate them.
Eric Finster: Dependetopes and Higher Generalized Algebraic TheoriesMike Stay: Generating Hypercubes of Type Systems[Oxford Seminar] Matteo Capucci | A Second Taste of Quantitative Logic[DOTS Lectures] 13. A general representability theorem for Systems Theory Pt. 3[2-torial] Quantum information theory, Part 3: Quantum bird watchingAdrian Miranda: Kleisli constructions for pseudomonads[Berkeley Seminar] Ea Thompson | A Characterization of Pro-representable Virtual Double CategoriesPierre-Louis Curien: Opetopic shapes, combinatoriallyA quick intro to CatColabChristine Tasson: Semantics for Reactive Probabilistic ProgrammingE.Subrahmanian & Y.Keraron: Engineering practice and the potential role of CT in systems engineering[2-torial] Quantum information theory, Part 2: Quantum theory isnt real
Topos Institute |

Eric Finster: "Dependetopes and Higher Generalized Algebraic Theories"

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER