ERATOSTHENES PROVED A SMALL LOCAL SUN over a flat motionless earth Carl Sagan lies exposed @rocketspushoffair

rockets push off air | ERATOSTHENES PROVED A SMALL LOCAL SUN over a flat motionless earth Carl Sagan lies exposed @rocketspushoffair | Uploaded January 2021 | Updated October 2024, 14 hours ago.
The direct custom link is http://range.flat.wtf This video shows how the data obtained by Eratosthenes, when properly used, actually proves a small local Sun over a flat earth. His false interpretation of the data is a result of his assumptions of a spinning globe, and parallel light from a massive distant Sun.

A flat table was turned into a globe, in a perfect scientific experiment http://lens.flat.wtf (direct link to YouTube video) when DEBUNKED http://spin1.flat.wtf unnatural assumptions were used. The independent variable was the lens, and the dependent variable was the angle of deception (Eratosthenes' 7.2 degree angle, that he was fooled by for not considering the effects of atmospheric lensing)

The video at http://lens.flat.wtf proves that the atmosphere acting as a lens causes the range of Sun heights, from a few to several thousand nautical miles. The range itself proves the Sun is close. The values at the extremities are discarded since they are most prone to error. This leaves 2700 nautical as the BEST estimate of the height of the sun. SMALL LOCAL SUN

BASIC ENGINEERING http://spin1.flat.wtf *No cracked material can spin, and no solid material can spin over 1000 mph w/o exploding way before that.*

My challenge for Globeheads: WITHOUT ANY WILD ASSUMPTIONS (DEBUNKED AT http://spin1.flat.wtf ) show me how the range of heights proves a massive distant sun, parallel light, and a 1000 mph spinning cracked basalt covered ball. When it clearly proves a small local Sun moving over a flat motionless earth, from which the data was derived http://lens.flat.wtf

SCIENCE DOES NOT REQUIRE WILD UNNATURAL ASSUMPTIONS: such as a cracked basalt covered behemoth globe spins like a top over 1000 mph. *Show us that cracked basalt can do this.* Prove cracked basalt can contain trillions of psi of tension (caused by the behemoth globe spinning over 1000 mph see http://spin1.flat.wtf for calculations and pages from engineering textbooks), when it cannot even contain 1 psi. *No cracked material can spin, and no solid material can spin over 1000 mph w/o exploding well before that speed.* FAKE GLOBE.

http://spin1.flat.wtf goes directly to Blogger. You can also click the Blogger icon on the about page of my channel.

COPY INTO YOUTUBE COMMENTS (WILL INSTANTLY BECOME HYPERLINKS):

lens.flat.wtf and for video descriptions use http://lens.flat.wtf

*ERATOSTHENES DEBUNKED FLAT EARTH no he forgot atmosphere is a lens* lens.flat.wtf

range.flat.wtf and for video descriptions use http://range.flat.wtf

*ERATOSTHENES PROVED A SMALL LOCAL SUN over a flat motionless earth Carl Sagan lies exposed* range.flat.wtf

rockets push off air
37 minutes ago
@Andrew Holdaway (Eratosthenes) proved a small local sun over a motionless flat earth, just get rid of the assumptions of a cracked basalt behemoth spinning 1000 mph, parallel light and distant sun. The data requires no assumptions to be properly interpreted. The range proves a small close sun. The values at the extremities are discarded since they are most prone to error. This leaves 2700 nautical as the BEST estimate of the height of the sun. The atmosphere is the reason we don't have thee exact height http://lens.flat.wtf

(original!) SHADOWS PROVE Sun circling above 😆😁😂 stick.flat.wtf

I PROVE EARTH IS NOT A SPINNING GLOBE so simple a kid can understand welcome to flat earth

SUN LOCAL OVERHEAD LIGHT dead sea sunset proves flat earth plus setting sun demo

NO NEGRO BELIEVES GLOBAL WARMING {nosuchthingasgreenhousegas.com}

WHY A SPINNING SPHERE SPLITS basic engineering proves motionless flat earth

(KillerSpray.com) CONtrails DO NOT EXIST according to older aviation textbooks

TIME MAGAZINE SAYS EARTH IS FLAT crushing blow for deniers

$(ultra SloMo) GUN RECOIL is atmosphere SMACKING back of barrel as it equalizes pressure inside Direct custom link http://gunrecoil.flat.wtf (goes to western gun firing clip that keeps repeating automatically) Clip of western gun firing starts at 222s time stamp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtK3P6Jd_co&t=222s What the NRA says is false and misleading: RECOIL is caused by a SUDDEN RELEASE OF GAS forced into the atmosphere much like a rocket AFTER the bullet leaves the barrel. Recoil is NOT caused by a sudden release of gas into the atmosphere; this is NOT like a rocket (a rocket is like a blowtorch and you have continuous combustion); the only part thats true is that recoil occurs AFTER the bullet leaves the barrel, when it is LONG GONE! The video title explains recoil: (ultra SloMo) GUN RECOIL is atmosphere SMACKING back of barrel as it equalizes pressure inside Ultra SloMo montage remix by Franky UK channel https://www.youtube.com/user/scruffbags EASY debunk rockets dont need air https://youtu.be/cEb6XFHTMPs rockets push off air (final cut NERD video + extra experiments) https://youtu.be/CLjxKhdQSrI Why do globe earthers use linear motion analogies? https://youtu.be/tx_K3Ix0zn8 new perspective 17 minutes ago SG your crossbow bolt is a solid object, you CANNOT compare a solid to a gas for the sake of qualifying your mass to be able to have force applied to it... So you load your bolt and just as you pull the trigger it turns to GAS, wheres your momentum? Put this same situation in a VACUUM of 10^-17 Torr and you have a the same situation as firing ice cubes into the sun... new perspective 10 hours ago SG you do know that the effect of expanding plumes show the rocket is performing outside of optimum parameters.....Nozzles are only as good as the AIR IT INHABITS LOL,... when a plume is under-expanded or over-expanded it is definitely not performing well, and this also proves that a rocket utterly relies upon air density or why have a nozzle at all or why design them for optimum operating altitude? Below utterly states a rocket is designed around air pressure and nozzles are designed to match the optimum ambient air PRESSURE, and SPACE sg, has none... I have shown you SG all the reasons using physics why a rocket cannot function in space, you believe you see rockets go to space, but they can only go 25 km and are doomed to crittical over-expansion. READ THIS SG http://blogs.esa.int/cleanspace/2016/03/01/what-happens-in-a-rocket-plume/ What happens in a plume depends on a number of factors: firstly a rocket nozzle is designed to optimise its thrust. To do this the nozzle must expand the high pressure combusted fuel to a low pressure exhaust at its exit plane – the maximum thrust is reached when the nozzle expands the combustion gases to the same pressure as the atmosphere outside the nozzle. Since the pressure in the atmosphere decreases dramatically for most of the launch the pressure at the nozzle exit is either higher or lower than the atmospheric pressure. This leads to an interesting phenomenon in the nozzle exit region plume. Since the plume is travelling at supersonic speeds relative to the external atmosphere the difference in pressure produces shockwaves and expansion waves which in turn form areas of afterburning combustion in the plume. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time... CO.AG music {Dark ambient background music - It’s time to finish the fight} https://youtu.be/nVxx_c9B35c$

FLAT EARTH MORE LAND HOAX get real pond-hugger

THE WORLDS FOREMOST PROBLEM The International Jew by Henry Ford