Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
EPA is not abandoning federal PFAS regulation, but it is redrawing part of the compliance map.
Amanda Canida of Black & Veatch explains that the agency has proposed rescinding the regulatory determinations, maximum contaminant levels, and health-based goals for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, and the PFAS Hazard Index. EPA would then restart that process under the standard Safe Drinking Water Act framework, including separate public comment periods for the regulatory determination and the rule itself.
A second proposal would create a streamlined federal exemption process for water systems that cannot meet the current schedule because of technical, financial, or logistical constraints. EPA could not legally issue a blanket two-year extension, so utilities would instead need to apply individually.
The agency is preparing for a potentially large wave of exemption requests. For utilities, that means the path to more time may exist, but it will not be automatic.
The practical takeaway is clear: track the rulemaking, prepare the documentation, and keep PFAS planning and treatment projects moving while the regulatory details are still being settled.
Episode at youtu.be/NJjbCwxhBIE?si=GYxZw4mVqFNRMgHk
waterloop is a nonprofit news outlet exploring solutions for water sustainability. Visit waterloop.org
Subscribe to catch every video: youtube.com/@waterloop
Never miss an episode! Subscribe to waterloop:
🎧 Spotify:bit.ly/waterloopSpotify
🎧 Apple Podcasts:bit.ly/waterloopApple
🎧 YouTube Podcasts:bit.ly/waterloopYouTubePod
Follow waterloop for more stories on water sustainability:
🔹 Instagram:instagram.com/the_waterloop
🔹 LinkedIn:linkedin.com/company/thewaterloop
#PFAS #EPA #DrinkingWater #WaterUtilities #PFASRegulation #ForeverChemicals #SafeDrinkingWaterAct #WaterPolicy #WaterTreatment #EmergingContaminants #PublicHealth #BlackAndVeatch #Waterloop
EPA is not abandoning federal PFAS regulation, but it is redrawing part of the compliance map.
Amanda Canida of Black & Veatch explains that the agency has proposed rescinding the regulatory determinations, maximum contaminant levels, and health-based goals for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, and the PFAS Hazard Index. EPA would then restart that process under the standard Safe Drinking Water Act framework, including separate public comment periods for the regulatory determination and the rule itself.
A second proposal would create a streamlined federal exemption process for water systems that cannot meet the current schedule because of technical, financial, or logistical constraints. EPA could not legally issue a blanket two-year extension, so utilities would instead need to apply individually.
The agency is preparing for a potentially large wave of exemption requests. For utilities, that means the path to more time may exist, but it will not be automatic.
The practical takeaway is clear: track the rulemaking, prepare the documentation, and keep PFAS planning and treatment projects moving while the regulatory details are still being settled.
Episode at youtu.be/NJjbCwxhBIE?si=GYxZw4mVqFNRMgHk
waterloop is a nonprofit news outlet exploring solutions for water sustainability. Visit waterloop.org
Subscribe to catch every video: youtube.com/@waterloop
Never miss an episode! Subscribe to waterloop:
🎧 Spotify:bit.ly/waterloopSpotify
🎧 Apple Podcasts:bit.ly/waterloopApple
🎧 YouTube Podcasts:bit.ly/waterloopYouTubePod
Follow waterloop for more stories on water sustainability:
🔹 Instagram:instagram.com/the_waterloop
🔹 LinkedIn:linkedin.com/company/thewaterloop
#PFAS #EPA #DrinkingWater #WaterUtilities #PFASRegulation #ForeverChemicals #SafeDrinkingWaterAct #WaterPolicy #WaterTreatment #EmergingContaminants #PublicHealth #BlackAndVeatch #Waterloop
