Economic Statecraft Is a Political Tool, Not an Economic One | The High Top @csis
Economic Statecraft Is a Political Tool, Not an Economic One | The High Top  @csis
Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Why do sanctions so often fail to deliver the outcomes Washington wants? Phil Luck argues that both economists and policymakers get economic statecraft wrong, economists treat it as an economic tool when it is really political, and policymakers overrate coercion when aligned incentives are far more durable. Jon Alterman draws out the underappreciated implication: using economic power well requires empathy.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.

Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: https://cs.is/2dCfTve

Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: twitter.com/csis
• Facebook: facebook.com/CSIS.org
• Instagram: instagram.com/csis
Economic Statecraft Is a Political Tool, Not an Economic One | The High TopWas This World Cup More Political? | State of PlayMunitions Shortages After Epic FuryMeasuring U.S. Energy SecurityEconomic D-Day, ExplainedAvoiding War in the South China SeaAsia in the New Nuclear AgeEscalating Japan-China Tensions: A Conversation with Kristi GovellaObstacles to AI Opportunities | Betting on AmericaMore Tariffs and Implications | EST Rapid RoundupNavigating Strategic Competition: Sen. Tammy Duckworth on the Future of U.S. Indo-Pacific EngagementAI Agent Containment Failures: Technical Realities and Policy Responses
Center for Strategic & International Studies |

Economic Statecraft Is a Political Tool, Not an Economic One | The High Top

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER