Uploaded May 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
The news in British Columbia is all about DRIPA – the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. The premier of the province David Eby, in response to the December 2025 BC Court of Appeal ruling of a case known as Gitxaala, raced to amend the act. His attempts to do so have become a headspinning spectacle.
The original case began in 2023 with a challenge to the Mineral Tenure Act, which allowed mineral explorers to strike a mineral claim without acquiring agreement and consent by the historical First Nation to the area.
The case upheld the miners’ position that consent was not required during exploration. It was the first challenge to DRIPA. It was immediately appealed and in December of 2025, the BC Court of Appeal overturned the lower court ruling by stating, “The Declaration Act gives a statutory mandate and duty to take all measures necessary to bring British Columbia’s law into alignment with UNDRIP.”
“In other words,” says Indigenous legal authority, Robin Junger, “the BC government must, as stated in its own words, follow the law it wrote and the court has no option.”
We invited Robin Junger of McMillan LLP to join us for a Conversation That Matters to outline exactly what DRIPA is and the legal ramifications of amending the legislation.
---
Your support matters! Become a patron and subscribe: goo.gl/ypXyDs
The views discussed in this video are the opinions of our guests and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Oh Boy Productions or this show. Any images in this video are for fair use only, as we are a journalism outlet that seeks to illustrate the topic or guest involved.
ctm606 #bcpoli #dripa #firstnations
The news in British Columbia is all about DRIPA – the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. The premier of the province David Eby, in response to the December 2025 BC Court of Appeal ruling of a case known as Gitxaala, raced to amend the act. His attempts to do so have become a headspinning spectacle.
The original case began in 2023 with a challenge to the Mineral Tenure Act, which allowed mineral explorers to strike a mineral claim without acquiring agreement and consent by the historical First Nation to the area.
The case upheld the miners’ position that consent was not required during exploration. It was the first challenge to DRIPA. It was immediately appealed and in December of 2025, the BC Court of Appeal overturned the lower court ruling by stating, “The Declaration Act gives a statutory mandate and duty to take all measures necessary to bring British Columbia’s law into alignment with UNDRIP.”
“In other words,” says Indigenous legal authority, Robin Junger, “the BC government must, as stated in its own words, follow the law it wrote and the court has no option.”
We invited Robin Junger of McMillan LLP to join us for a Conversation That Matters to outline exactly what DRIPA is and the legal ramifications of amending the legislation.
---
Your support matters! Become a patron and subscribe: goo.gl/ypXyDs
The views discussed in this video are the opinions of our guests and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Oh Boy Productions or this show. Any images in this video are for fair use only, as we are a journalism outlet that seeks to illustrate the topic or guest involved.
ctm606 #bcpoli #dripa #firstnations









![Breast Cancer Screening: Underfunded? (w/ Dr. Paula Gordon, University of British Columbia)
“The shortage of breast radiology services in [British Columbia] is having an impact on breast imaging services,” says Dr. Paula Gordon, a radiologist and medical researcher specializing in breast cancer. She is a Clinical Professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of British Columbia. “Add in inadequate fee structures that discourage radiologists from performing breast cancer screening and the situation is only going to get worse,” continues Gordon.
Gordon points out, “Were finding loads of cancers at our clinic, doing ultrasound for women with dense breasts. But the fee they told us to use is not a screening fee, and it doesnt cover the true overhead, so our colleagues in the community – who are more business-minded – are refusing to offer it.”
“As a result, women are going to private clinics and they are being gouged,” says Gordon. “They’re paying upwards of $750 for an ultrasound screening that the public system pays $115 to perform.” The end result is women are underserved in breast cancer services in BC.
We invited Dr. Paula Gordon to join us for a Conversation That Matters about the current quality of medical care women are being provided in breast health in BC.
Your support matters! Become a patron and subscribe: https://goo.gl/ypXyDs
The views discussed in this video are the opinions of our guests and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Oh Boy Productions or this show. Any images in this video are for fair use only, as we are a journalism outlet that seeks to illustrate the topic or guest involved.
ctm615 #cancer #healthcare #oncology Breast Cancer Screening: Underfunded? (w/ Dr. Paula Gordon, University of British Columbia)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MOao8cXFXvM/mqdefault.jpg)
