Godless Engineer | Does THIS Prove Jesus' Tomb Was Empty??? ft. @ExploringReality @godlessengineer | Uploaded April 2024 | Updated October 2024, 5 hours ago.
In today's video, we're diving deep into the empty tomb narrative described in Mark's Gospel and examining its historical reliability. Than from @ExploringReality makes the case that the women finding the empty tomb first derails the standard explanation that this event fits Mark's narrative themes. Many argue that the story of the empty tomb is a cornerstone for the Christian faith, claiming it as a historical event. However, I will challenge these claims by dissecting the narrative elements and their implications.
We start by discussing Mark's unique portrayal of the empty tomb, where women, often marginalized figures in biblical texts, are the first to discover the resurrection. This choice by Mark is not incidental but a thematic choice to elevate the most minor expected witnesses, aligning with his broader narrative strategy that 'the first will be last, and the last shall be first.'
Moreover, the discussion will cover how the narrative of Mark doesn't end with a confirmation of the resurrection by Jesus himself, unlike other gospels. This has led to various interpretations and modifications by later Christians who added extended endings to Mark, reflecting their discomfort with the original abrupt conclusion.
Through this analysis, we'll explore how the narrative-driven nature of the gospels can often conflict with historical accuracy. The discrepancies among the gospel accounts about who discovered the empty tomb and what they did afterward provide a clear example of narrative convenience over historical fact. This suggests a stronger literary and theological motive rather than a factual recounting of historical events.
So, if you're interested in critically examining one of the most debated miracles in the Christian faith and want to understand the difference between historical fact and theological narrative, this video is for you!
Original Video: youtube.com/watch?v=YcWmQ-IzL9s
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
#atheism #christianity #atheist
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 15% off Ridge Wallets: godlessengineering.com/ridgedeal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
In today's video, we're diving deep into the empty tomb narrative described in Mark's Gospel and examining its historical reliability. Than from @ExploringReality makes the case that the women finding the empty tomb first derails the standard explanation that this event fits Mark's narrative themes. Many argue that the story of the empty tomb is a cornerstone for the Christian faith, claiming it as a historical event. However, I will challenge these claims by dissecting the narrative elements and their implications.
We start by discussing Mark's unique portrayal of the empty tomb, where women, often marginalized figures in biblical texts, are the first to discover the resurrection. This choice by Mark is not incidental but a thematic choice to elevate the most minor expected witnesses, aligning with his broader narrative strategy that 'the first will be last, and the last shall be first.'
Moreover, the discussion will cover how the narrative of Mark doesn't end with a confirmation of the resurrection by Jesus himself, unlike other gospels. This has led to various interpretations and modifications by later Christians who added extended endings to Mark, reflecting their discomfort with the original abrupt conclusion.
Through this analysis, we'll explore how the narrative-driven nature of the gospels can often conflict with historical accuracy. The discrepancies among the gospel accounts about who discovered the empty tomb and what they did afterward provide a clear example of narrative convenience over historical fact. This suggests a stronger literary and theological motive rather than a factual recounting of historical events.
So, if you're interested in critically examining one of the most debated miracles in the Christian faith and want to understand the difference between historical fact and theological narrative, this video is for you!
Original Video: youtube.com/watch?v=YcWmQ-IzL9s
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
#atheism #christianity #atheist
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 15% off Ridge Wallets: godlessengineering.com/ridgedeal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
