Godless Engineer | Does THIS Argument Prove Objective Morality Exists ft. @Paulogia on @qnaline @godlessengineer | Uploaded June 2024 | Updated October 2024, 9 hours ago.
In today's video, @Paulogia and I dive into an intense and thought-provoking call from "The Line," where Dan presents his arguments on moral naturalism. This isn't just a casual chat; it's a deep exploration into whether morality can be objective or inherently subjective.
Dan challenges us by discussing moral naturalism, a concept that suggests we can establish an objective moral system by making predictions and seeing if they come true. He proposes that any involuntary imposition of will is immoral and tries to convince us that we can derive objective morality from subjective foundations. The conversation gets heated as we dissect his claims, question his definitions, and test the robustness of his arguments.
Throughout the call, we tackle:
The definitions and distinctions between objective and subjective morality.
The role of predictions in establishing moral truths.
The practical implications of moral naturalism.
How resources and circumstances influence moral judgments.
Dan's attempt to provide a scientific approach to morality sparks a dynamic discussion. We push back on his assertions, clarifying that even scientifically grounded predictions about morality remain subjective as they are rooted in mind-dependent systems. We scrutinize the feasibility of achieving a genuinely objective moral framework.
Join me as I critically analyze Dan's arguments, providing you with the tools and insights to understand and question the nature of morality. Don't miss out on this deep dive into one of the most challenging philosophical debates!
If you enjoy content that challenges religious and philosophical claims, subscribe to my channel and hit the notification bell so you never miss an upload. Also, check out "The Line" for more live call-in shows where we tackle tough questions and debate exciting topics.
Original Video:
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
#atheism #christianity #atheist
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 15% off Ridge Wallets: godlessengineering.com/ridgedeal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
In today's video, @Paulogia and I dive into an intense and thought-provoking call from "The Line," where Dan presents his arguments on moral naturalism. This isn't just a casual chat; it's a deep exploration into whether morality can be objective or inherently subjective.
Dan challenges us by discussing moral naturalism, a concept that suggests we can establish an objective moral system by making predictions and seeing if they come true. He proposes that any involuntary imposition of will is immoral and tries to convince us that we can derive objective morality from subjective foundations. The conversation gets heated as we dissect his claims, question his definitions, and test the robustness of his arguments.
Throughout the call, we tackle:
The definitions and distinctions between objective and subjective morality.
The role of predictions in establishing moral truths.
The practical implications of moral naturalism.
How resources and circumstances influence moral judgments.
Dan's attempt to provide a scientific approach to morality sparks a dynamic discussion. We push back on his assertions, clarifying that even scientifically grounded predictions about morality remain subjective as they are rooted in mind-dependent systems. We scrutinize the feasibility of achieving a genuinely objective moral framework.
Join me as I critically analyze Dan's arguments, providing you with the tools and insights to understand and question the nature of morality. Don't miss out on this deep dive into one of the most challenging philosophical debates!
If you enjoy content that challenges religious and philosophical claims, subscribe to my channel and hit the notification bell so you never miss an upload. Also, check out "The Line" for more live call-in shows where we tackle tough questions and debate exciting topics.
Original Video:
Daily Bible Podcast: ge.hopp.to/DailyBiblePodcast
#atheism #christianity #atheist
Subscribe to this channel: ge.hopp.to/SubToGe
Join the Skeptic Mafia: ge.hopp.to/JoinSkepticMafia
Available Deals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 15% off Ridge Wallets: godlessengineering.com/ridgedeal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download CHRESTUS: ge.hopp.to/CHRESTUS
Get your "Citation Fucking Needed" Shirt: ge.hopp.to/citationfuckingneeded
"got evidence?" shirt: ge.hopp.to/GotEvidenceShirt
"btw, evolution is a fact" shirt: ge.hopp.to/BTWEvolutionIsAFact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discord Server: ge.hopp.to/JoinGEDiscord
