Uploaded December 2025 | Updated September 2026, 10 hours ago
Does the generation gap really exist?
During my next livestream, I’ll be tackling one of the most persistent myths about AI adoption: that younger workers naturally "get it" while older generations struggle.
Research on disruption proves it's completely bogus.
Here's what actually matters:
👉 You don't become more resistant to change the older you get, and you're not more disruptive when you're younger. Age doesn't predict AI fluency…but disposition does.
Some people are wired as early adopters. They're constantly asking, "What's new?"
Others prefer to find tools they love and master them deeply.
Both approaches are valuable. The problem starts when we confuse age with disposition, and disposition with open or closed-mindedness.
What this means for leaders:
If you're building AI strategy around generational assumptions, you're solving the wrong problem. The real question isn't "How do we get Boomers on board?" or "How do we leverage Gen Z's tech savviness?"
It's "How do we create an environment where people of all dispositions can develop AI fluency?"
Join me on Tuesday, December 9 at 9AM PT/12PM ET for a conversation on how to identify the real barriers to AI adoption in your organization, and what successful companies understand about building diverse, AI-ready teams.
Who's ready to stop blaming generations and start building better strategies?
🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/4924604317958144
Does the generation gap really exist?
During my next livestream, I’ll be tackling one of the most persistent myths about AI adoption: that younger workers naturally "get it" while older generations struggle.
Research on disruption proves it's completely bogus.
Here's what actually matters:
👉 You don't become more resistant to change the older you get, and you're not more disruptive when you're younger. Age doesn't predict AI fluency…but disposition does.
Some people are wired as early adopters. They're constantly asking, "What's new?"
Others prefer to find tools they love and master them deeply.
Both approaches are valuable. The problem starts when we confuse age with disposition, and disposition with open or closed-mindedness.
What this means for leaders:
If you're building AI strategy around generational assumptions, you're solving the wrong problem. The real question isn't "How do we get Boomers on board?" or "How do we leverage Gen Z's tech savviness?"
It's "How do we create an environment where people of all dispositions can develop AI fluency?"
Join me on Tuesday, December 9 at 9AM PT/12PM ET for a conversation on how to identify the real barriers to AI adoption in your organization, and what successful companies understand about building diverse, AI-ready teams.
Who's ready to stop blaming generations and start building better strategies?
🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/4924604317958144
![ESG Metrics — Do They Actually Work? [Stakeholder Capitalism]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/E-UMrnPDtPA/mqdefault.jpg "ESG Metrics — Do They Actually Work? [Stakeholder Capitalism]
ESG — environmental, social and governance — metrics are used to measure how “well” a company is doing on its responsibility to ALL stakeholders (not just shareholders!).
But what if these measurements are doing more HARM than good? In Tuesday’s livestream, I’ll reveal the problems with these metrics, and why we must address the problems *underneath* what they measure to make transformational progress.
Join me on January 24th live and I’ll see you there!
#Disruption #Innovation #LeadingChange #LeadershipAndManagement #LeadershipEffectiveness #LeadersCreateLeaders #Leadership #LeadershipDevelopment #Strategy #Breakthrough")
