Uploaded June 2012 | Updated September 2026, 11 hours ago
Some skeptics and atheists have tried to refute the Kalam Cosmological Argument with the following rebuttal: "The argument is logically self-contradictory. For it says that everything has a cause, yet concludes that there is a first uncaused cause."
William Lane Craig responds to this so-called refutation.
Some skeptics and atheists have tried to refute the Kalam Cosmological Argument with the following rebuttal: "The argument is logically self-contradictory. For it says that everything has a cause, yet concludes that there is a first uncaused cause."
William Lane Craig responds to this so-called refutation.
